![]() | Member's News | No.49 January 2007 |
||
print / save view |
Abstract
The perfect execution of exercises expands the maneuverability of the
intended musculature of a sportsman. Indian trainers, coaches, physical
educators and athletes often tend to copy the world-class champions, athletes
and performers as research in this field in India has thus far been limited.
Copying has become a cyclic trend, which has not revolutionised the result
of the designed exercises. This study was designed to electromyographically
analyse muscles activation during different abdominal exercises to be
performed for maximum advantage. The electromyography amplitudes of contraction
of the rectus abdominis, internal oblique and external oblique during
three different sit-up exercises were recorded. Ten male subjects selected
for the experiment were of All India Intervarsity Level from Aligarh Muslim
University, Aligarh. Their mean age, height and weight were 21.4 yrs,
167.4 cm and 62.6 kg respectively. The Student Physiograph was used for
EMG recording and all procedures were standardised. Three sets of observations
were made on each subject. The electrodes were located over the belly
of the muscles and oriented along its longitudinal axis. The sit-up exercises
were executed to 720 angles. The undertaken sit-up exercises were analysed
by ANOVA. The concentric and the eccentric phase of exercises were examined
by paired t-test and compared with statistical significance at 0.05 levels.
The time pulse was synchronised to angles of movement. The Optimisation
technique was used to obtain the angle of maximum contraction intensity.
Results of the research indicates that different quadrants contract optimally
at different angles. Our findings support the concept that abdominal strengthening
exercises can differentially activate various abdominal muscle groups,
but contradict some traditionally held assumptions regarding the effects
of specific exercises. Introduction
An essential ingredient to the type of complete physique for any sports
performance is a trim and well developed anterior midsection (abdominal).
The anatomical and kinesiological review of literature of the anterior
midsection reveals that the rectus abdominis is the rigid muscle wall
across the entire front of the abdominal. It has a crenellated, washboard
like appearances, in fact when optimally developed, it can be one of
the most highly detailed areas and sharply defined in entire physique.
Primarily, the actual muscle that must be developed
through strong, scientific and consistent training are those that that
control the abdominals. Efficacy of exercises requires practice steming
from an acknowledged theoretical model of the functioning organism and
must be supported by research designs. However, in India, research is
scarce in the field of sports and exercise training. Acute mechanical
and methodological issues, along with the complexity of muscular contraction
patterns, have imposed limitations on operative research. In addition
difficulties in accurately locating the complex muscular actions and force
reproduction have been limiting.
The abdominal muscle acts virtually in every thing
that one does. The abdominals help to stabilise your upper body and acts
as a bridge between upper and lower body in sequential transfer of load
in motor activities of every day life and rigorous sports activity. The
right approach to abdominal training will be of incredible value in achieving
the physical goals of sportsman and woman.
It is difficult to isolate action to any particular
section of the rectus abdominis but there are general rules for which
area of the frontal abdominis wall is worked by various types of movement:
the upper section works hardest in sit-up work, while various type of
leg raises work the lower part of the muscle more intensely. However,
recent research has indicated that there are differences in electrical
activity in various parts of rectus abdominis.
The largest and most frequent force generated within
body is by contraction of muscles. Normally, muscles do not contract alone
because this would produce a stereotype nonfunctional motion. The role
of individual muscle, or a group of muscles in producing movement or stabilising
body segments, may be examined by palpating the muscle to judge when it
is active and relaxed but there is no record for analysing the timing
or magnitude of muscle contractions.
Most abdominal exercises designed have been merely
empirically derived. Sometimes new procedures have presented as promising,
but they have lacked firm theoretical and methodological basis. Electromyography
(EMG) has been an important tool in helping to understand proper exercise
executions and effects produced on the designated muscle. The onset, duration
and peaks of the muscular activity are seen on the EMG.
The development of amplifying and recording equipment
during World War II made it possible to use improved methods for the study
of muscular activity in living human subjects. Eminent researchers and
scientists (Inman, 1952; Ralston, 1960; Basmajian, 1978 and Heckathorne,
1981) reported that the sequence of activation and relaxation as well
as the relative amount of activity performed by particular muscles produced
various isolated and coordinated functions.
The recorded amplitude of muscle action potential
bears no quantitative relationship with muscular tension (Pocock, 1963).
There is a direct linear relationship between integrated EMG and isotonic
tensions if the velocity of the movement is held constant (Bigland and
Lippold, 1954).
Comparatively few Electromyographical (EMG) studies
have been done on the abdominal muscles in the applied field of sports
and exercises. EMG has been an important contrivance in helping to understand
electrical characteristics of muscle and muscular contraction and explore
its uses in motion analysis. EMG provides a measure of the level of muscle
activation and has been used to evaluate synergistic patterns associated
with exercises.
Using surface electrodes for this type of study
seems well established. Most of the previously mentioned comparative studies
have used surface electrodes (Francis and Scott, 1974; Gough and Ladley,
1971; Jackson, 1973). Alington, et al (1966) used both surface and needle
electrodes side by side and found that they produced similar results.
Bouisset and Maton (1972), found a linear relationship between integrated
EMG activity collected by surface and intra-muscular electrodes.
However, the main emphasis in this study is not
only the integrated EMG changes but also on the differences in functional
output of amplitudes of the muscles of the abdominal at different phases
and angles of movement (sit-up exercises). Methodology
Participants
Ten (10) male All India Intervarsity level players (Football, Hockey and Athletics) from Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, volunteered as subjects in the experiment. They range in age from 19 to 24 years (mean of 21.4 years). Prior to testing, all the subjects were informed of the nature of the tests and the appropriate consent was obtained. Surface EMG was recorded from the abdominal muscle using bipolar electrodes. Electromyographic recordings were made of the right abdominal muscles. Descriptive anthropometrics data are provided in the Table 1. Apparatus
The Student Physiograph (Biodevices, Ambala) was used for the experiment. Because of the equipment limitation, only one muscle (quadrant) could be recorded at a time. Prior to the subject’s arrival in the laboratory, the instruments were calibrated. The sensitivity for EMG recording was set at 100µv and the paper speed was set at 25 mm/sec. The frequency cut-off marked at 3 Hz. The diameters of the bipolar electrodes were 1.3cm. Procedure
The study defined the quantitative characteristics of the abdominal muscles during different abdominal exercises. The measurement record included the amplitude, frequency and time in response to standard procedure. There was no way of measuring the velocity of the
movement during exercise but an attempt was made to control the velocity
by establishing a set rhythm for performance. The players were given practice
of the different variations of abdominal exercises and all were performed
with three counts. Subjects were trained to perform the exercises on the
count one, two and three. The players practiced for a period of two weeks
to do the abdominal exercises in a sequence of beats of watches (along
with the counts). The watch beats has been amplified and the exercises
were continued at that beat sound. Table 1. Anthropometric Description
The experimental instructions to subjects were as follows:
The concentric and eccentric phases of the exercise were considered
and the eccentric phase was recorded for the second set study.
The players performed the following abdominal exercises:
(i) Straight Leg Sit-up, (ii) Bent Leg Sit-up, and (iii) Crunches. The
reading was recorded for three repetitions to avoid the effect of fatigue
and all exercises were performed with an interval of 3 to 5 minutes.
Firstly, the abdominal reflexes were elicited while
subjects performed the exercises. To determine appropriate electrode placement,
the palpation techniques described by Smith, Weiss, and Lehmkuhl (1996)
were used. The skin over the target muscles was abraded and cleaned to
assure low skin resistance. After the setting up of frequency, paper speed,
etc. the electrodes were prepared using conducting gel and the proximal
electrodes placed directly over the belly of the designated muscle. The
electrodes’ position was maintained consistent from subject to subject.
Electrodes were placed distally in line with the muscle fibers. Both sets
of electrodes were centered from medial to lateral. The ground electrode
was secured slightly superior to the lateral malleolus of the right leg.
Electrodes were placed in the Upper Umbilicus and Hypogastria of the rectus
abdominis and the external oblique and internal oblique muscles. Electrodes
for the external oblique were placed between the lower edge of the rib
cage and the anterior superior iliac spine, in a line directly superior
to the latter. The electrode on the internal oblique was placed in a small
triangular area bounded by the lateral edge of the rectus, the inguinal
ligament and a line connecting the Umbilicus and the Anterior Illiac spine.
The exact site of placement was immediately inferior to a transverse line
through the anterior superior Illiac spine.
It is known that during sit-up exercises, the body
does not move with the same velocity through out the range of motion.
As the change of velocity is very small, the researchers tried to control
by reducing and keeping the velocity constant throughout the range of
motion. To coordinate the time pulse and motion angles, utmost care was
taken that rhythm of the one, two and three count coordinated at mentioned
angles. The sit-up exercises were executed to an angle of 72° (degrees).
An angle marked scale was constructed using a goniometer and were placed
at 24°, 48° and 72°. The base line scale was placed in the
line of the segmental line joining the shoulder axis and hip axis for
torso motion and for leg motion the scale was placed in line with the
hip axis and lateral Malleolus point axis.
In this study, the averaged of frequency, duration and amplitudes were
used, using the technique of quantification described by Kelley (1971).
Then EMG signal was analysed on the basis of amplitude and time. The
amplitude was simply defined as the height of the wave and the time
pulses were coordinated with the angles of movement. The optimum EMG
amplitudes have been taken as feedback to the corresponding time pulse
to generalise the contraction intensity of the muscle. The EMG time
and amplitude recordings were synchronised to that of the angles. The
measures of average amplitude at every angle were measured to compute
the mean value of the sample. These means were subjected to Optimisation
Technique to identify the angles at the optimum contraction intensity
(amplitude). A program for Optimisation Technique has been developed
to operate in FORTRAN-77. Results
The performance scores of the first set were subjected to analysis of
variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. A separate analysis of variance
(ANOVA) with repeated measures was calculated for each of the four individual
muscles.
The EMG amplitudes measures for each position for
the Rectus abdominis (Upper Rectus and Lower Rectus), Internal Oblique
and External Oblique as a whole are presented in Table 2.
Statistical study of the ANOVA table confirmed that
significant differences were obtained between EMG amplitudes of different
groups of muscles [F=8.28; p<0.05; Tab. F=6.94]. The analysis indicated
that the different types of abdominal exercises were not significant [F=1.92,
p>0.05]. The recordings for all the different abdominal exercises i.e.
Straight Leg Sit-up, Bent Leg Sit-up and Crunches were found to be homogenous.
While there were differences between different sets of exercises, there
were not significant enough to recommend one being the best abdominal
exercise for the anterior abdominal muscles. Further statistical analysis
shows the differences between the different abdominal muscles with significant
differences found between the Rectus abdominis (Upper and Lower Rectus)
and Oblique (External and Internal Oblique). There were noted significant
difference between the Upper Rectus and Internal Oblique; Upper Rectus
and External Oblique; Lower Rectus and Internal Oblique; and Lower Rectus
and External Oblique. There were no significant difference between Upper
Rectus and Lower Rectus and no significant difference between Internal
Oblique and External Oblique. The different sets of exercises showed a
very marked activity difference in different groups of muscles. Table 2. The mean values of the average EMG output
in Amplitudes
Upper Rectus (UR), Lower Rectus
(LR), Internal Oblique (IO) and External
Oblique (EO)
Straight Leg sit-up (SLS), Bent Leg Sit-up (BLS) and Crunches (CR) The data of all the rectus quadrants (Epigastria
(Epi), Upper Umbilicus (Up.umbi), Lower Umbilicus (Lo.umbi) and Hypogastria
(Hypo)) of rectus abdominus were put onto the Optimisation Program developed
to identify the angle of highest intensity of contraction during the
sit-up exercises. The result revealed that the intensity of the muscular
contraction during sit up exercises varied at different angles of motion.
The amplitudes means of the different quadrants varies.
The result indicate that in Straight Leg Sit-Up
exercise. The maximum angle is 44.05° for Lower Umbilicus and 34.83°
for Upper Umbilicus. The Epigastria and Hypogastria act at maximum between
these ranges.
In the case of Bent Leg Sit-Ups, the maximum contraction intensity is at 36.25° for Lower Umbilicus and 32.27° for Hypogastria. The Epigastria and Upper Umbilicus act between these two angles of motion. The Crunch has 38.09° for Lower Umbilicus and
31.78° for Epigastria while doing Crunch 38.09° is maximum angle.
Concentric and eccentric phases of muscular contraction
during the sit-up exercises were subjected to statistical analysis.
The mean EMG amplitude values were analysed using a paired t-test for
each of the 3 exercises. Reported differences were accepted as statistically
non-significant at p > 0.05. The statistical analysis paired t-test
showed no significant differences between the concentric and eccentric
phase of contraction during the sit-up exercises. The mean EMG data
showed variations that for each exercise tested in the Upper Umbilicus
(Up.Um.) and Hypogastria (Hypo) region of the rectus abdominis. Table 3. Angle identification
Epigastria (Epi), Upper Umbilicus
(Up.Umbi), Lower Umbilicus (Lo.Umbi)
and Hypogastria (Hypo) Straight Leg sit-up (SLS), Bent Leg Sit-up (BLS) and Crunches (CR) Table 4. The mean values of the EMG Amplitudes of Concentric and Eccentric
phase of Abdominal Exercises in Rectus Abdominis muscles
Concentric (Con), Eccentric
(Ecci)
Straight Leg sit-up (SLS), Bent Leg Sit-up (BLS) and Crunches (CR) During the straight leg sit-up, the Upper Umbilicus showed a mean differences
of 1.35 (con.-10.00 & ecc.-8.70). The same muscle, during a bent
leg sit-up, showed a mean difference of 1.13 (con.-11.10 & ecc.-9.97)
and of 0.69 (con.- 10.00 & ecc.-9.31) for the crunch exercise. All
mean values were not significantly different from each other.
The Hypogastria region during straight leg sit-up exercise showed a
mean differences of 0.84 (con.-10.51 & ecc.-9.67), bent leg sit-up
of 0.66 (con.-9.52 & ecc.-8.86) and the crunches is of 0.51 (con.-
12.00 & ecc.-11.49). All mean values were not significantly different
from each other.
Table 5. Statistical analyses of concentric and eccentric phases of
Sit-up Exercises
Tabulated t-value: Tab.t = 2.26 Significant = Cal.t > tab.t Non Significant = Cal.t < tab.t Discussion
Of the wide range of exercises claiming to tone and strengthen the abdominal
muscles, many of these are inadequate and ineffective. Some exercises
may actually lead to lower back pain and do little to strengthen the
abdominals. The purpose of this investigation was to provide accurate,
useful information and exercise guidelines for abdominal training. In
addition, several myths and misconceptions about abdominal training
have been dispelled.
The result of this investigation reveals that abdominal
exercises do affect the degree of activity of the rectus abdominals and
oblique muscles. It is clear that the rectus abdominis, by its amplitudes
of the activity, is a stronger mover in abdominal exercise, while the
obliques are not as strong. The most significant findings of this investigation
were the greater amount of activity in the lower rectus compared to that
of upper rectus. The reason for this may be the difference in stability
of the insertion of the two portion of rectus. The insertion of the upper
fibers, to the rib cage, is relatively mobile compared to that of the
insertion of the lower rectus (Symphysis Pubis). This difference in mobility
may have affected the action of the upper rectus.
Full sit-ups involve the hip flexors, which may
cause the lower back to arch and unwanted back pain, particularly in individuals
with relatively weak abdominals (Mutoh, Mori, Nakamura & Miyashita,
1981). Leg-raising exercises in a supine position challenge the hip flexors
with limited involvement of the abdominals (Libetz & Gutin, 1970).
Frequently, there is a muscle imbalance between the weaker abdominals
and the stronger hip flexors in trunk flexing movements (Kendall, McCreary
& Provance, 1993). The goal of abdominal training is to maximise the
involvement of the abdominals, while minimising the involvement of the
hip flexors (Walters & Partridge, 1957).
Partial sit-up or crunch exercises, with the knees
flexed and ankles unsupported, are the best for strengthening the abdominal
muscles, without risk to the lower back (Mutoh et al., 1981).
When performing some abdominal exercises, it often
feels like the muscle is divided into an upper and lower section. Although
the abdominal muscles have inter-segmental nerve stimulation, you are
not able to contract one section independent of the other. However, when
the hips are stabilised and only the trunk is lifted, there is relatively
more muscle shortening in the upper abdominal region, which leads to greater
muscle activation in that region (Walters & Partridge, 1957).
Perhaps one of the most common and important questions
asked about abdominal training is “How high up should you going
in a crunch (or curl-up)?” Research suggests that the abdominals
flex the spinal column for about the first 30 to 45 degrees of movement,
which is approximately equivalent to lifting your shoulder blades off
the ground (Laban, Raptou & Johnson, 1965; Plowman, 1992; Rasch &
Burke, 1978; Ricci, Marchetti & Figura, 1981). Due to the potential
pressure placed on the lower spine by the hip flexors, full sit-ups cannot
be recommended. Plowman (1992) adds that bent knee, feet supported sit-ups
may cause lumbar stress, which could lead to harmful effects on the lumbar
discs. Several studies indicate that supine crunches, with bent knees
and unsupported legs, maximise abdominal activity and minimise hip flexor
(specifically the rectus femoris) activity (Godgrey, Kindig & Windell,
1977; Guimaraes et al., 1991; Libetz & Gutin, 1970; Walters &
Partridge, 1957). Since the effectiveness of the abdominal exercises is
within this small range of motion (30 - 45 degrees), more repetitions
may have to be performed to appropriately challenge these muscles.
This study supports previous findings that there
is no significant difference in abdominal muscle intensity between the
concentric and eccentric contraction for any traditional abdominal exercises
i.e. where any external resistance during the course of exercises is not
added. In addition, there is an increase in abdominal muscle activity
during the course of exercise execution.
The principal reason for lower (non-significant)
abdominal activity in the eccentric phase than the concentric phase is
that the vertical lift against the gravitational force provides enough
resistance to require substantial muscle recruitment in concentric contraction.
The findings are similar to those reported by Clark et al (2003).
Minimal abdominal muscle recruitment is required while performing downward
motion (eccentric) in a supine lying position as enough load to require
comparable abdominal muscle activity is produced due to the controlled
motion as recorded during the abdominal exercise. The generation of
muscles activation increases with lowering of velocity of the movement.
In order to provide greater overload to the abdominal
musculature on a traditional abdominal exercise, additional resistance
must be provided.
In summary, all abdominal exercise elicited abdominal
muscle activity during concentric and eccentric phase of contraction when
used with proper technique. The perfect way to perform an abdominal exercise
is to elicit significantly greater abdominal muscle recruitment. Practical Applications
The results of this study verify that abdominal exercises used in a
supine position elicit abdominal muscle activity when performing a traditional
abdominal exercise.
As the different traditional techniques of abdominal
exercises do not differ significantly in the activation of the designated
muscles, any one of these exercise techniques may be performed to enhance
strength and/or endurance.
The research results have revealed that the sit
up exercise must be executed to a maximum angle of 45.00° and minimum
of 31.78°. Hence the abdominal exercise should be performed to 45.00°
angle for better effectiveness and productive value.
As there is no significant difference between the
concentric and eccentric phase of contraction during the selected abdominal
exercises, the eccentric phase of contraction should be performed religiously,
because the eccentric phase of contraction can maximise the force exerted
and the work performed by the muscle; associated with a greater mechanical
efficiency. The mechanical effects of impact forces can attenuate and
reduce the tissue damage, pain and injuries associated with exercise. References
Alfredson, H. Pietilae, T. Jonsson, P. & Lorentzon,
R. (1998). Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment
of chronic Achilles tendinosis. American Journal of Sports Medicine,
Baltimore (Md.), 26, 3, pp.360-366.
Allington, R.O., Baxter, M.L., Koepke, G.H., &
Christopher, R.P. (1966). Strengthening techniques of the quadriceps muscles:
an electromyographic evaluation. Phys. Therapy. 46:1173-1176.
Basmajian, J.V. (1978). Muscles Alive, 4th edition,
Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Co.
Bigland, B. & Lippold, OCJ. (1954). The relation
between force, velocity and integrated electrical activity in human muscles.
J Physiol (Lond) 123: 214-224.
Bigland-Ritchie, B., Furbush, F. & Woods, JJ.
(1986). Fatigue of intermittent submaximal voluntary contractions: central
and peripheral factors. J. Appl Physiol 61: 421-429.
Bobbert, M. & Harlaar, J. (1992). Evaluation of
moment-angle curves in isokinetic knee extension. Med Sci Sports Exerc.,
25: 251-259.
Bouisset, S. & Maton, (1972). EMG and muscular
force in normal motor activity. In New developments in EMG and Clinical
Neurophysiology, Vol.1. Edited by J. Desmedt, pp.547-583. Basel,
Krager Publishing Co.
Clark, KM. Holt, LE. & Sinyard, J. (1992). Electromyographic
comparison of the upper and lower rectus abdominis during abdominal exercises.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 17(3): 475 –
483.
Demont, R.G., Lephart, S.M., Giraldo, J.L., Giannantonio,
F.P., Yuktanandana, P. & Fu, FH. (1999). Comparison of two abdominal
training devices with an abdominal crunch using strength and EMG measurements.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. Sep. 39(3):253-8.
Sternlicht, E. & Rugg, S. (2000). Electromyographic
Analysis of Abdominal Muscle Activity Using Portable Abdominal Exercise
Devices and a Traditional Crunch. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research: Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 463–468.
Fang, Y., Siemionow, V., Sahgal, V., Xiong, F. &
Yue, G.H. (2001). Greater Movement-Related Cortical Potential During Human
Eccentric Versus Concentric Muscle Contractions. The Journal of Neurophysiology
October, Vol.-86 No.4, pp.1764-1772.
Francis, R.S. & Scott, D.E. (1974). Hypertrophy
of the vastus medialis in knee extension. Physical Therapy, 54:1066-1070.
Godgrey, K.E., Kindig, L.E. & Windell, J.E.(1977).
Electromyographic study of duration of muscle activity in sit-up variations.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 58, 132-135.
Gough, J.V. & Ladley, G. (1971). An investigation
into the effectiveness of various forms of quadriceps exercises. Physiotherapy,
57: 356-361.
Guimaraes, A.C., Auerlio, M., Campos, M.I.A.E. &
Marantes, R. (1991). The contribution of the rectus abdominis and rectus
femoris in twelve selected abdominal exercises. The Journal of Sports
Medicine and Physical Fitness, 31, 222-230.
Heckathorne, C. & Childress, D. (1981). Relationship
of the surface electromyogram to the force, length, velocity and contraction
rate of the cineplastic human biceps and triceps. Am. J. Phys. Med.,
60: 1-19.
Hortobagyi, T., Barrier, J., Beard, D., Braspennincx,
J., Koens, P., Devita, P., Dempsey, L. & Lambert, J. (1996). Greater
initial adaptations to submaximal muscle lengthening than maximal shortening.
J Appl Physiol 81: 1677-1682.
Inmam, V., Ralston, H., Saunders, J., Fenstein, B.
& Wright, E. (1952). Relation of human electromyogram to muscular
tension. Electroenceph. and Clin. Neurophysiol, 4:187-194.
Jackson, R.T. (1973). EMG study of quadriceps during
resting stage exercise. Phys. Therapy, 53: 253-256.
Kelley, D.L. (1971). Kinesiology: fundamentals
of motion description. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey.
Kendall, F. P. McCreary, E. K. Provance, P.G. (1993). Muscles and testing
function (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Laban, M.M., Raptou, A.D. & Johnson, E.W. (1965).
Electromyographic study of function of iliopsoas muscle. Archives
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 46, 676-679.
Libetz, S. & Gutin, B. (1970). An electromyographic
study of four abdominal exercises. Medicine and Science in Sports
and Exercise, 2, 35-38.
Moritani, T. (1992). Time course of adaptations during
strength and power training. In: Strength and Power in Sports,
edited by P.V. Komi, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, p. 266-278.
Mutoh, Y., Mori, T., Nakamura, Y. & Miyashita,
M. (1981). The relation between sit-up exercises and the occurrence of
low back pain. In H. Matsui &. K. Kobayashi. (Eds.), International
series on biomechanics, Biomechanics VIII A (pp. 180-185). Baltimore:
University Park Press.
Plowman, S.A. (1992). Physical activity, physical
fitness, and low back pain. In J.O. Holloszy (Ed.). Exercise and Sport
Sciences Reviews (pp. 221-242). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Pocock, G.S. (1963). Electromyographic study of the
quadriceps during resistive exercise. Physical therapy, 43:427-434.
Ralston, H.J., III, Miller, M.R. & Kasahara, M. (1960). Nerve endings
in human fasciae, tendons, ligaments, periosteum and joint synovial membrane.
Anat. Rec., 136: 137-147.
Rasch, P.J. & Burke, R.K. (1978). Kinesiology
and applied anatomy (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Fibiger.
Ricci, B., Marchetti, M. & Figura, F. (1981).
Biomechanics of sit-up exercises. Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise, 13, 54-59.
Smith, L.K., Weiss, E.L. & Lehmkuhl, L.D. (1996).
Brunnstrom’s Clinical Kinesiology, 5th.edition, Jaypee
Brothers Medical publishers (p) Ltd.C-5/19, Delhi.
Tesch, P.A., Dudley, G.A., Duvoisin, M.R., Hather,
B.M. & Harris, R.T. (1990). Force and EMG signal patterns during repeated
bouts of concentric and eccentric muscle actions. Acta Physiol Scand
138: 263-271.
Walters, C.E. & Partridge, B.S. (1957). Electromyographic
study of the differential abdominal muscles during exercise. American
Journal of Physical Medicine, 36, 259-268.
Wilkins, H.A., Petersen, S.R., Bagnall, K.M. Wessel,
J. Quinne H.A. & Wenger, H.A. (1988). The influence of isokinetic
concentric resistance training on concentric and eccentric torque outputs
and cross-sectional area of the quadriceps femoris. Can. J. Sport
Sci. 13: 76-77. Acknowledgments
We greatly appreciate the cooperation and interest of the staff of the
Department of Physiology, NMC, AMU, Aligarh. Our special thanks are
extended to Prof. Rajendra Singh, Director, Jiwaji University, Gwalior;
Prof. Tariq Aziz, Department of Applied Mathematics, AMU, Aligarh; Dr.
Rajiv Gulati, Dr. Sangita Sahgal, D/O Physiology, JNMC, AMU, Aligarh;
Dr. Athar Ali Moinuddin, Department of Electronic, Z.H.Engg.College,
AMU, Aligarh; Dr. Haseeb Athar, Dept. of Statistics, AMU, Aligarh; Mr.Somvir
Sharmr (STA), JNMC, AMU, Aligarh; for their contributions in the data
collection, interpretation, processing and altruistic support in completion
of the experiment. Contact
Dr. Ikram Hussain
Department of Physical Health & Sports Education Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh, India. ikram1691@yahoo.com Dr. Kalpana Sharma
Noida College of Physical Education Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Road DhoomManikpur, GBN Uttar Pradesh, India. drkalpanas@gmail.com Ahsan, M. and Ansari, N.W
Research scholar, Department of Physical Health & Sports Education Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh, India. ![]() http://www.icsspe.org/portal/index.php?w=1&z=5 |