Sport and Human Rights
No. 48
September 2006
left up: © Afghan Youth Sports Exchange
left: © Right To Play
   
Bulletin No.48
 
 
Publisher's Statement
 
Publisher's Statement
 
 
Foreword
 
Editorial - English
 
Editorial - French
 
President's Message - English
 
Message de la Présidente - French
 
New Members
 
 
Feature
 
Introduction
Eli A. Wolff & Mary A. Hums
 
Quote - Muhammad Ali /Ali Center
 
Achieving Human Rights in and through Sport
Peter Donnelly & Bruce Kidd
 
Sport and Children's Rights
Peter Donnelly
 
Profile - Unite for Children Unite for Peace
 
Quote - Johann Olav Koss
 
Profile - Sport for Development and Peace International Working Group
 
Multiculturalism and Universal Proclaimed Values in the Olympic Movement: An Approach to Human Rights and Sport Development?
Lamartine DaCosta, Neise Abreu & Ana Miragaya
 
Olympism and Human Rights:
Ideals in Action
Mary A. Hums & Eli A. Wolff
 
Quote - Dr. Richard Lapchick
 
Paths for Women and Men Towards Human Rights in Sport: The Same, Delayed or Divergent?
Carole Oglesby
 
The Politics of Race and Sport in the Promotion of Human Rights
Doris R.Corbett
 
Profile - "Out in Sport" at the GLISA Human Rights Conference
July 26-29, 2006
Rob Jagnow
 
Quote - Cheri Blauwet
 
Profile - Sport and Adapted Physical Activity: Advocates of Rights and Dignity for All
Claudine Sherrill & Yeshayahu Hutzler
 
The Development of the Human Rights of Individuals with Disabilities in Sport at the United Nations and Beyond
Elise C. Roy
 
Profile - Promoting Human Rights Through Paralympic Sport
 
BEIJING 2008 - The Olympic Games Come To China:
Will Human Rights?
Mickey Spiegel
 
The Wrong Way Around
Keith Gilbert
 
Profile - International Year of Sport and Physical Education 2005
 
How You Play the Game:
Creating Sport Programming to Promote and Protect Human Rights
Anita Keller
 
Human Rights of Women and Girls in Sport:
A Case Study of the Afghan Youth Sports Exchange
Kabul, Afghanistan
Awista Ayub
 
Human Rights and Animal Welfare: The Implications of Anti-hunting Legislation in the United Kingdom
David McArdle
 
Quote - Thierry Henry
 
Profile - Stand Up Speak Up
 
Profile - Athletes for Human Rights
 
Activist Athletes and Human Rights: Some Preliminary Research Notes
Peter Kaufman
 
Profile - Recognition for Tommie Smith, John Carlos and the Olympic Project for Human Rights
Ken Noel
 
Quote - Anita DeFrantz
 
 
Current Issues
 
Environmental Aspects of the Olympic Games - an Interdisciplinary Approach World-wide
Thomas Reilly
 
The IAAF School / Youth Programme
Abdelmalek El-Hebil
 
Addition to Bulletin No 46
 
 
Partners and Events
 
MYSA from Kenya Crowned as the First Street Football World Champion
Panos Manologlou & Vladimir Borkovic
 
2007 World Conference on Doping in Sport
 
Upcoming Events
 
Sport, Leisure and Ergonomics, The Ergonomics Society
 
Second International Forum on Women, Sport and Culture
 
Adjusting the Sails Towards Healthy Active Living (CAHPERD)
 
 
ICSSPE News
 
ICSSPE Meetings in Berlin
August 30 – September 1, 2006
Christophe Mailliet
 
TAFISA Honorary President Prof. Dr. Jürgen Palm has passed away
Obituary written by Wolfgang Baumann
 
In Remembrance, Alain Poncet
Gretchen Ghent
 
Posthumous Honour for Jürgen Palm and Alain Poncet
 
 
Member's News
 
Sport of Ancient People of Siberia
Valeriy Krasilnikov
 
 
Resources
 
Watching the Web:
Sport and Human Rights
Sálmar Burger
 
Bibliographic Information:
Human Rights in Youth Sport
Paulo David
 
Book Review:
Wooden on Leadership Mike Spino
Mike Spino
 
Publication Announcement:
Dictionary
Sport, Physical Education and Sport ScienceHerbert Haag
Herbert Haag
 
 
Contacts
 
Publisher's Statement

Publisher's Statement
 

ISSN 1728-5909
No. 48, September 2006

The Bulletin of the International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education (ICSSPE) is published three times a year. Its goal is to provide a forum for ICSSPE members and other contributors to share news and experiences, raise issues for discussion, develop international and external links and promote events. The featured articles and other contents are monitored by the ICSSPE Executive Office and the Editorial Board, with the aim of allowing for free and balanced dissemination of information consistent with ICSSPE’s aims and objectives. The views expressed within this publication are not necessarily those held by ICSSPE unless otherwise stated.

The Bulletin is published by
International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education (ICSSPE)
Hanns-Braun-Straße
Friesenhaus II
14053 Berlin
Germany
Tel.: +49 30 3641 8850
Fax: +49 30 805 6386
icsspe@icsspe.org
http://www.icsspe.org

Publications Manager: Katrin Koenen
Editor: Tamie Devine
Design: Astrid Lange

ICSSPE Editorial Board:
Prof. Darlene A. Kluka
Ms. Gretchen Ghent
Prof. Herbert Haag
Prof. Colin Higgs
Prof. Andrew Hills (Beginning Jan 2007)
Prof. Anneliese Goslin (Beginning Jan 2007)
Prof. Alexander Woll (Beginning Jan 2007)
Prof. Richard Bailey (Beginning Jan 2007)
Prof. Kari Keskinen (Beginning Jan 2007)
Mr. Christophe Mailliet


© Copyright 2006, ICSSPE. For information about this work, please contact ICSSPE. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce and distribute copies of this work for nonprofit educational purposes, provided that copies are distributed at or below cost, and that the author, source, and copyright notice are included on each copy.


Foreword

Editorial - English
 
 

First of all, I would like to introduce myself. My name is Katrin Koenen and I am pleased to have taken over as Publications and Scientific Affairs Manager from the beginning of June. Some of you may know me already as I have worked for ICSSPE a couple of times before on a project basis. My last projects were the conferences on ‘Rehabilitation through Adapted Physical Activity and Sport for Children and Youth Affected by the Tsunami in Southeast Asia’ held in Bangkok, 2005, and it’s follow up conference in January in Berlin and I also published the last Bulletin. I am very happy to now be a real ‘member’ of the ICSSPE team and hope to be able to offer you some informative and interesting publications.
Bulletin 48 features ‘Sport and Human Rights’, with contributions from a range of countries, showing many different ways to look at this theme. It also contains - I think for the first time - profiles and quotes on Sport and Human Rights. This issue certainly would not contain the breadth and depth of papers and contributors without the much appreciated collaboration of Eli A. Wolff, Northeastern University Center for the Study of Sport in Society and Dr. Mary A. Hums, University of Louisville, to whom I wish to say a very special thank-you!
The Current Issues section contains a report from T.P. Reilly entitled ‘Environmental Aspects of the Olympic Games – an Interdisciplinary Approach’. It is extremely interesting and reflects on how environmental aspects influence the outcomes of major sports tournaments. The second article by Malek El Habil gives us an interesting view of the IAAF Athletics’ World Plan, with a focus on the IAAF World Athletics Day, and its outreach to schools.
Again, many events will be held in all fields of sport, sport science and physical activity, and many of them can be found in our Upcoming Events listing in the Partners and Events section of the Bulletin.
Please also keep up to date with news from Members, where you will find an article on ‘Sport for ancient People of Siberia’ by Valerii Krasilnikov.
Christophe Mailliet will give a summary of the ICSSPE meetings in Berlin in the ICSSPE news section, where we are saddened to announce the deaths of Jürgen Palm and Alain Poncet, who both dedicated their life to sport science and Physical Education.
In the Resources section, please find bibliographic information on Sport and Human Rights, along with a book review called “Wooden on Leadership” and our regular webliography.
Don’t forget that as an ICSSPE member, you are also able to complete a Conference Announcement Form online (in the Member’s section of our website) that will automatically be added to our Member’s Events list on the website (www.icsspe.org). Your announcement will also be included in the Bulletin Upcoming Events list. Please let us know about any meetings, conferences or events that you wish to share with everyone.

With best wishes for happy reading
Katrin



Editorial

 

Avant toute chose, permettez-moi de me présenter. Mon nom est Katrin Koenen et j'ai le plaisir d'être la nouvelle Manager des Publications et des Affaires Scientifiques depuis début juin. Certains parmi vous me connaissent pour avoir déjà travaillé avec le CIEPPS sur des projets ponctuels. Mes derniers projets ont été les conférences sur la "Réhabilitation par l’activité physique adaptée et le sport pour les enfants et adolescents touchés par le Tsunami dans le Sud-est asiatique » qui s'est tenue à Bangkok en 2005, et la conférence consécutive à Berlin en janvier. J'ai également publié le dernier Bulletin. Je suis très heureuse d'être désormais un "vrai" membre de l'équipe du CIEPSS et j'espère pouvoir vous offrir des publications informatives et intéressantes.
Ce Bulletin 48 est consacré au "Sport et Droit de l'homme", avec des contributions provenant de nombreux pays qui montrent les différentes manières de considérer ces thèmes. Il comprend également - pour la première fois, je pense - des profiles d'organisations et des citations relatifs au thème du Sport et des Droits de l'homme. Ce numéro n’aurait pas autant d’ampleur et de profondeur dans le choix de ces articles et de ces contributeurs sans la cooperation avec de Eli A. Wolff, du Centre d'Etude du Sport en Société de la Northeastern University et Dr. Mary A. Hums, de l'Université de Louisville, à laquelle j'adresse un grand merci!
La section Current Issues contient un reportage de T.P. Reilly intitulé : "Environmental Aspects of the Olympic Games – an Interdisciplinary Approach", qui reflète de manière très intéressante l'influence des aspects environnementaux sur les résultats de grands tournois sportifs. Le second article de Malek El Habil nous offre une vue intéressante sur le IAAF Athletic's World Plan, en particulier sur le IAAF World Athletics Day et sa portée dans les écoles.
Une fois de plus, de nombreux évènements vont avoir lieu dans les domaines du sport, de la science du sport et de l'activité physique et vous retrouverez nombre entre eux dans notre liste des Upcoming Events dans la section Partners and Events du Bulletin.
Vous pouvez vous informer de l’actualité dans Members, où vous trouverez un article sur le «Sport pour les peuples autochtones», rédigé par Valerii Krasilnikov.
Christophe Mailliet signe un résumé des meetings du CIEPSS à Berlin dans la section ICSSPE News, où nous avons également la triste responsabilité d’annoncer les décès de Jürgen Palm et d’Alain Poncet, qui tous deux avaient dédié leur vie à la science du sport et`a l'Education Physique.
Dans la section Resources vous trouverez des indications bibliographiques sur le Sport et les Droits de l'Homme, ainsi qu'une revue de livres intitulée "Wooden on Leadership" et notre revue du Web habituelle.
N'oubliez pas qu'en tant que membre du CIEPSS, vous avez la possibilité de remplir en ligne un formulaire pour annoncer vos rendez-vous (dans la section Member de notre site Internet) qui sera automatiquement ajoutée à la liste des évènements à venir (www.icsspe.org). Tenez-nous au courant des rencontres, conférences et évènements que vous souhaitez faire connaître.

Avec mes meilleurs vœux et en vous souhaitant une bonne lecture.
Katrin



President's Message

An important collaborative step was taken this summer between the different fields of sports, education and science when the International Paralympic Committee, the International Olympic Committee, the International Federation of Sports Medicine and ICSSPE agreed to merge their congresses into the new International Convention of Science, Education and Medicine in Sport (ICSEMIS). This new multidisciplinary event will replace previous conferences that were organised by the four stakeholders and be a new umbrella for the many facets of sport, science and education. The inaugural event, organised in cooperation with our Chinese partners, will be held 1-5 August 2008 in Guangzhou, China. The 2008 ICSSPE General Assembly will be held prior to this date, also in Guangzhou. If you are planning to hold your statutory meetings or scientific symposiums in conjunction with ICSEMIS, please inform the ICSSPE Executive Office as soon as possible and be sure to mark these dates in your calendar.
Berlin, which for the past 10 years has played host to the ICSSPE Executive Office, is an exciting place for sport. This has been even more evident this summer with the FIFA World Cup Final rounding off a four week celebration of football for hundreds of thousands of guests from all over the world. At the same time, ICSSPE member streetfootballworld hosted the world championships in streetfootball. Jürgen Griesbeck, Manager of streetfootballworld impressed many of us with his energy and patience in making this idea become a reality. Watching the young athletes play with self-defined rules and without referees was an excellent example of respect and friendship for many of us. The Special Olympics National Games, which were held in the third week of September, offered a chance for more than 2000 athletes to compete in 15 disciplines and qualify for the World Games in Shanghai. Soon afterwards, the Berlin marathon, with almost 40000 participants and ranked as one of five World Marathon Majors, took place in the city. In between all of this excitement, the ICSSPE family met in Berlin for its annual board meetings and the General Assembly. Despite the many technical advances in communication over long distances, it is always very special to meet representatives of ICSSPE member organisations and institutes, of which there are currently around 300. This year, it was a great pleasure for both the team in the ICSSPE Executive Office and I to welcome so many of you to Berlin. Important decisions were made which offer more legal security for ICSSPE and its members as well as new opportunities to apply for funding. During the meetings it was also agreed to set up a working group whose task will be to develop an anti-doping position statement of ICSSPE. Though ICSSPE has participated in the development of the WADA Anti-Doping Code and the UNESCO Convention against doping, a statement that covers the whole spectrum of interests that the member organisations represent, needs to be developed. Its coverage shall go beyond legislative and moral matters and will, among other items, include educational and economical perspectives as well. You will be informed about the next practical steps in due time.
I would also like to infom you that, as of 1 January 2006, we will have new members on the Executive Board. The General Assembly elected John Saunders, Walter Mengisen and Lateef Amusa to the Board; reelected were Alicia Rutkowska-Kucharska and Michael McNamee.
Following our statutory meetings, we held a symposium on talent identification and development, in co-operation with our partner, DKB-ISTAF, organisers of one of the IAAF Golden League events. Models of talent identification and development and scepticism on success were discussed from many different perspectives, and those of you who participated know that much effort is still needed to bridge the gap between practitioners and scientists.
Again, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the many ICSSPE initiatives through which we try to further develop sport and physical education and actively contribute to social development.
Prof. Dr. Gudrun Doll-Tepper
President, ICSSPE



Message de la Présidente

Une étape importante pour la coopération entre les différents secteurs du sport, de l'éducation et de la science, a été franchie cet été, lorsque le Comité International Paralympique, le Comité International Olympique, la Fédération Internationale de Médecine du Sport et le CIEPSS, se sont mis d'accord pour réunir leurs congrès en une Convention Internationale pour la Science, l'Education et la Médecine du Sport (CISEMS). Ce nouvel évènement pluridisciplinaire remplacera les conférences organisées précédemment par les quatre membres fondateurs et se veut une platte-forme pour les multiples facettes du sport, de la science et de l'éducation. La convention inauguratrice, organisée avec nos partenaires chinois, aura lieu du 1er au 5 août 2008 à Guangzhou, en Chine. L'Assemblée générale du CIEPSS en 2008 se tiendra antérieurement, également à Guangzhou. Si vous prévoyez des rencontres statutaires ou des symposiums scientifiques dans le cadre de la CISEMS, informez-en le Comité exécutif du CIEPSS le plus tôt possible et notez bien les dates dans votre calendrier.
Berlin, qui accueille depuis presque dix ans le bureau exécutif du CIEPSS, est une ville passionnante pour le sport. Pour preuve, la finale de la Coupe du Monde de la FIFA cet été, qui a clôturé quatre semaines de célébration du football, à laquelle ont participé des centaines de milliers de visiteurs en provenance du monde entier. Au même moment, l'un des membres du CIEPSS, streetfootballworld, présentait le championnat du monde de football de rue. L'énergie et la patience dont a fait preuve Jürgen Griesbeck, le directeur de streetfootballworld, en montant ce projet, nous ont tous beaucoup impressionné.
Voir ces jeunes athlètes jouer selon des règles établies par eux-mêmes et sans arbitre, était un bel exemple de respect et d'amitié pour nous tous. Les Special Olympics, qui se sont tenus pendant la troisième semaine de septembre, ont offert à plus de 2000 athlètes la chance de s'affronter dans 15 disciplines différentes et de se qualifier pour les Jeux Mondiaux à Shangai. Peu de temps après, le marathon de Berlin, considéré avec ses 40.000 participants comme l'un des cinq World Marathon Majors, a eu lieu. Au milieu de toute cette activité, la famille du CIEPSS s'est rencontrée à Berlin pour son meeting annuel et son Assemblée Générale.
Malgré les avancées technologiques qui nous permettent de communiquer à longue distance, c'est toujours un plaisir de rencontrer les représentants des organisations et instituts membres du CIEPSS qui sont actuellement approximativement 300. Cette année, ce fut un grand plaisir pour l'équipe du bureau exécutif du CIEPSS et pour moi-même de vous accueillir à Berlin. Les décisions importantes qui ont été prises vont garantir une plus grande sécurité légale au CIEPSS et à ses membres, ainsi que de nouvelles possibilités de postuler pour des financements.
Pendant les meetings, nous nous sommes également mis d'accord sur la création d'un groupe de travail dont l'objectif sera d'élaborer une déclaration contre le dopage du CIEPSS. Bien que le CIEPSS ait participé au développement du code de L'Agence Mondiale Antidopage - WADA et de la Convention de l'UNESCO contre le dopage, une déclaration qui couvre tout l'éventail des intérêts représentés par les organisations membres doit être élaborée. Sa portée ira au-delà des questions législatives et morales, et inclura entre autres, des perspectives éducatives et économiques. Nous vous informerons de l'évolution concrète du projet le moment venu.
Je souhaite également vous informer de l'arrivée, le 1er janvier 2007, de nouveaux membres au sein du Comité Exécutif. l'Assemblée Générale a en effet élu John Saunders, Walter Mengisen et Lateef Amusa et réélu Alicia Rutkowska-Kucharska et Michael McNamee.
Suite aux rencontres statutaires, nous avons organisé un symposium sur le repérage et le développement de talents, en coopération avec nos partenaires, DKB-ISTAF, les organisateurs de l'un des meetings de l'IAAF Golden League. Les nombreux points de vue sur les modèles de repérage et d'identification de talent, ainsi que le scepticisme sur le succès de certains modèles ont été partagés, et ceux parmi vous qui y ont participé, savent que de gros efforts doivent être faits pour réduire l'écart entre les praticiens et les scientifiques.
Encore une fois, je vous invite à participer aux nombreuses initiatives du CIEPSS à travers lesquelles nous essayons de développer le sport et l'éducation physique et de contribuer activement au développement social.

Prof. Dr. Gudrun Doll-Tepper
Présidente, ICSSPE



New Members

Since June 2006, ICSSPE has received the following membership applications that have been ratified at the 67th Executive Board Meeting in 2006.
A045-2
National Dept. of Sport & Recreation
SOUTH AFRICA
8 June 2006
D037-1
Dept. of Physical Education Sport and Culture University of Dar-es-Salaam
TANZANIA
12 June 2006
B057-13
Deaflympics
USA
22 June 2006
D128-7
Doshisha University
Institut of Health and Sport Sciences
JAPAN
26 June 2006
C020-1
Nigeria Baseball and Softball Association
NIGERIA
30 June 2006
D182-6
University of the Sunshine Coast
AUSTRALIA
30 June 2006
D104-1
Office of Woman Sport Development
IRAN
30 June 2006
D164-3
University of Bacau
ROMANIA
14 August 2006

Since September 2006, ICSSPE has received the following membership applications that will be ratified at the 68th Executive Board Meeting in 2007.
D020-4
University of Ado-Ekiti
NIGERIA
6 September 2006
B174-3
Panathlon International
ITALY
6 September 2006
D044-1
University of Namibia
NAMIBIA
13 September 2006
D178-5
Physical Education Area,
University of the Balearic Islands
SPAIN
15 September 2006


Feature

Introduction
Eli A. Wolff & Mary A. Hums

 

It has been a great pleasure to organize and develop this special issue on “Sport and Human Rights.” Thank you to ICSSPE for this unique opportunity. We hope the assembled collection of articles, profiles and quotes will further contribute to this important arena of research and activism, at a time in the world when this is increasingly important. Understanding the connection between sport and human rights is essential in our evolving and changing sporting community and society as a whole. As a vehicle to transform and unite, sport is a place for all people to learn, grow, share and communicate. In essence, sport is a place to become more fully human.
We organized the research contributions within several categories. Donnelly and Kidd provide us with an introduction to human rights in and through sport. DaCosta, Abreu and Miragaya, and Hums and Wolff focus on the connections among Olympism, the Olympic Movement and human rights. The articles by Oglesby, Corbett and Roy address specific groups of individuals. Spiegel and Gilbert present challenges to the linkages between sport and human rights. Keller, Ayub and McArdle provide practical case-study examples expressing human rights in and through sport. In conclusion, Kaufman presents a discussion on athlete activists. We would like to thank all of the authors for their excellent work and contributions to the field of sport and human rights.
This special issue highlights profiles of examples of organizational activities and initiatives in the arena of sport and human rights. These profiles are presented in connection with the thematic areas of the research contributions. We would like to thank Paulo David and Routledge Publishers; Lorna Read and Right to Play; Alison Qualter-Berna and UNICEF; Rob Jagnow and the Gay and Lesbian Athletics Federation; Claudine Sherrill, Shayke Hutzler and IFAPA; Amy Farkas and the International Paralympic Committee; Richard Leonard and UN-Sport; Maria Bobenrieth and Nike; Peter Roby and the Center for the Study of Sport in Society; and Ken Noel and the Olympic Project for Human Rights for their contributions. These profiles provide examples of how organizations can choose to incorporate human rights into their operations.
Finally, we included special and unique voices to provide statements and quotes regarding sport and human rights. These quotes personalize the arena of sport and human rights. We are so grateful for the contributions provided by Muhammed Ali and the Ali Center, Johann Olav Koss, Dr. Richard Lapchick, Cheri Blauwet and Anita DeFrantz. We would also like to thank Thierry Henry for the opportunity to re-print his quote.
We do hope you enjoy and engage with this special issue on Sport and Human Rights. We would like to also thank you, the reader, for your interest and commitment to promoting human rights in and through sport.



Quote - Muhammad Ali / Ali Center


“Fortunately for all of us, the pursuit of sports has resulted in the advancement of understanding of different people throughout the world. Sport unites people to a common cause, regardless of cultural, racial, political, sociological or religious differences. Ball fields, ice rinks, boxing rings and sports courts provide a common ground for all who engage. Sport gives us another pair of eyes in which to view our opponents. It teaches us to respect skill and hail accomplishments. It encourages us to be better at our own chosen pursuits. It demands that we continually re-evaluate our abilities and ourselves and shift the bar higher for our teammates and ourselves. Sport has a way of enriching the lives of all who participate, whether it is player, coach, or spectator. It forces us to find the greatness within.”
Muhammad Ali
August 2006
Founder of Muhammad Ali Center
Louisville, Kentucky

The mission of the Muhammad Ali Center is to preserve and share the legacy and ideals of Muhammad Ali, to promote respect, hope and understanding and to inspire adults and children everywhere to be as great as they can be.
The Muhammad Ali Center is both a destination site and an international education and cultural center guided by the ideals of its visionary founder, Muhammad Ali. Much more than a place that tells the story of one man’s journey, the Ali Center reaches beyond its physical walls to fulfill its mission, carry on Muhammad’s work and to inspire the greatness within ourselves. Located in Ali’s hometown of Louisville, Kentucky, the 93,000 sq. ft. Center includes 2-1/2 levels of exhibits, public programming, two changing exhibit galleries, meeting and event space and a retail store. www.alicenter.org



Achieving Human Rights in and through Sport
Peter Donnelly & Bruce Kidd

 

Abstract
This article notes the renewed international interest in human rights and addresses the ways in which human rights may be achieved in and through sport. Three overlapping sections deal with: (a) the use of sports to achieve human rights, focusing specifically on the anti-apartheid movement; (b) the right to participate in sports; and (c) the rights of specific classes of persons, which often combine ideas about the right to participate with ideas about the use of sport in the more general achievement of human rights. The latter section addresses women’s rights, aboriginal rights, disability rights, rights associated with those living in poverty, racial minorities, sexual orientation and, in the case of sport, athletes’ and workers’ rights. The article concludes by noting the need to determine how to make the right to participate in sport more widely available and the need to determine the circumstances under which participation in sport might assist in the struggle to achieve human rights.

Introduction
Following a period of stagnation, when United Nations (UN) actions on human rights were limited and spending for human rights was only 1% of the total UN budget, there has been a recent revival of interest in the issue of human rights. For example, the new United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council has finally been established to replace the problematic and ineffective UN Human Rights Commission; the second World Forum on Human Rights was recently (2006) held in France to mark the 40th and 30th anniversaries respectively of the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights, and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; and, perhaps most significantly, the UN established the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The MDGs represent a renewed commitment to achieving many of the human rights first outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration on Human Rights, establishing a timetable (2015) for the realization of these eight Goals:
  • Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
  • Achieve universal primary education
  • Promote gender equality and empower women
  • Reduce child mortality
  • Improve maternal health
  • Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
  • Ensure environmental sustainability
  • Develop a global partnership for development
As noted subsequently, sport has become involved in the achievement of the MDGs.
“Human rights are literally the rights one has because one is a human being,” (Donnelly, 1989, p. 9), and represent the difference between “a life” and “a life of dignity” (p. 17). Barnes’ more legal definition suggests that, “A ‘right’ is a just claim or recognized interest; it is a moral or legal entitlement that others are duty-bound to respect” (1996, p. 47). Thus, the realization of rights produces responsibilities for others, a situation that often involves politics and tensions. In addition to the general notion of human rights, rights have also come to be associated with classes of persons – people who, because of their subordinate status in the social structures and material conditions of their societies, have not achieved equal rights. Thus, there has been increased focus on, for example, children’s rights, women’s rights, aboriginal rights, disability rights and rights associated with those living in poverty, with racial minorities (sometimes a misnomer in countries such as South Africa), with sexual orientation and, in the case of sport, athletes’ rights.

Human Rights and Sports
Although the relationship between sport and human rights has only in recent years been considered a topic of research interest, it is important to note that human rights are continually and routinely violated in ways directly or indirectly related to sports. In order to address the various ways in which human rights may be achieved in and through sports, the following is organized into three overlapping sections: (a) the use of sports to achieve human rights; (b) the right to participate in sports; and (c) the rights of specific classes of persons, which often combine ideas about the right to participate with ideas about the use of sport in the more general achievement of human rights.

The achievement of human rights through sport
Although the response of the sport and physical education communities to the MDGs indicates a widespread belief in the possibility of sport being used to achieve human rights (see below), there is only one major example of a human rights campaign where sport is widely acknowledged to have been involved in its success, namely, the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa.
White supremacist governments in South Africa began to implement apartheid policies in 1948, relegating non-whites to second class including a ban from participation on national sports teams (and an attempt to ensure no non-whites competed on teams from other countries that came to South Africa). International concern in the sporting communities was slow to develop, sport organizations generally accepting the principle that ‘sport and politics should be separate’. The first anti-apartheid step taken by a sport organization was in 1956 when the International Table Tennis Federation replaced the all-white South African Table Tennis Union with the non-racial South African Table Tennis Board (SATTB). However, SATTB players were not permitted to travel to represent South Africa, having had their passports confiscated by the South African government (ANC, 1971).
In 1965, the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) gave moral and legal force to campaigns against apartheid and apartheid sport. The anti-apartheid campaigns increasingly gained the world’s attention, creating growing isolation of South Africa. Governments, civil society organizations and countries who continued to compete against white South African teams all combined to increasingly isolate South Africa from sporting contacts with other nations. Anti-apartheid leaders relied heavily on the moral and legal authority of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and CERD, which was binding upon all signatory governments. The United Nations was a continuing source of strength in the struggle against apartheid (cf., Guelke, 1993; Kidd, 1991).
It finally became impossible for Commonwealth leaders, who were responsible for reporting their progress on CERD, and who were developing their own post-colonial racial equity initiatives, to ignore the apartheid policies of one of its members, or to ignore the growing campaign to isolate South Africa from international sport. In 1977, they signed the Gleneagles Agreement on Sporting Contacts with South Africa, and by 1985, with the signing of the International Convention against Apartheid in Sport (UN Human Rights Commission), no country played South Africa in any major sport (cf., Hain, 1971; Thompson, 1988). It is possible to imagine the symbolic message delivered if no one played against your national team in any major sport, especially when some of your athletes and teams are among the best in the world. While many other political and economic measures were taken in the 40 year campaign against apartheid, it is widely acknowledged that the sporting isolation and condemnation of South Africa played an important role in ending apartheid during the years 1989-1994.

The right to participate in sport
Modern sports were developed in the 19th century as socialization and pleasure for imperial upper-class males (Kidd &Donnelly, 2000). Race, class and gender exclusions were routinely maintained in sports, and still are to some extent. Although various attempts were made to democratize participation, the barriers did not really begin to give way until after the Second World War, in the same period that led to the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and led to various liberations, civil rights and equal rights movements around the world. The right to participate in sports is an aspect of social and cultural rights and is directly related to the rights to health and education.
The Universal Declaration on Human Rights indirectly advocates the right to participate in sport through Article 24 (“everyone has the right to rest and leisure”) and Article 27 (“the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community”). However, the first specific international declarations of the right to participate in sport and physical activity emerged in the 1970s. European nations developed the 1976 European Sport for All Charter, the first Article of which stated that:
  • Every individual shall have the right to participate in sport.
    This was followed in 1978 by the International Charter of Physical Education and Sport, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO (www.unesco.org/youth/charter). The first Article states that:
  • The practice of physical education and sport is a fundamental right for all.
    In 1992, the Council of Europe refined the European Sports Charter to take into account high performance and professional sport issues such as violence and doping, and ideas about competitiveness and personal achievement. Article One states:
  • Governments, with a view to the promotion of sport as an important factor in human development, shall take the steps necessary to apply the provisions of this Charter in accordance with the principles set out in the Code of Sport Ethics in order:
  • i. to enable every individual to participate in sport…
    Even the IOC, an organization dedicated to high performance sport, declares as one of its Fundamental Principles (International Olympic Committee, 1997) that:
  • The practice of sport is a human right. Every individual must have the possibility of practising sport in accordance with his or her needs.
    The right to participate in sport and physical activity is now a matter of policy in many developed countries where it is recognized as ‘Sport for All’, and where it has achieved even greater urgency with growing concerns about health care costs and increasing obesity. However, attempts to implement Sport for All appear to have reached a plateau in recent years and, especially in developing nations, the right to participate in sport has either not been addressed, or has often been addressed in ways that are neo-colonialist, leading, for example, to the loss of existing physical cultures (by continuing to replace “non-Western body cultures with imperial games” (Giulianotti, 2006, p. 66)), or to the establishment of systems of sport that emphasize the development of high performance athletes rather than broad-based participation (e.g. Olympic Solidarity; see Donnelly & Kidd, 2006). Although the right to participate in sports is now widely recognized, it is not widely implemented.
Sport and the human rights of specific classes
Increasingly, marginalized groups and populations are announcing their presence and claiming their right to human rights with the use of sport. Using just one sport, football (soccer), recent examples include:
  • The Railroad All Stars (a soccer team of female sex workers in Guatemala)
  • The Millennium Stars (a soccer team of former child soldiers in Liberia)
  • Teams of amputees, who are victims of land mines and reprisal amputations in West Africa
  • The Homeless World Cup (teams comprised of homeless individuals from various cities)
These examples are replicated by larger classes of persons who, throughout the world, have struggled for greater involvement in sport (the right to participate), often as part of a larger struggle for human rights and/or in the belief that participation in sport will enable the achievement of human rights. The following provides a brief outline of some of these struggles.
Gender. The first major victory for women’s rights in sport was in the United States, where Title IX (the 1972 Educational Amendments to the Civil Rights Act) forced many public educational institutions to increase the resources for women’s sports. This legislation had a powerful impact on increasing the participation of girls and women in sport (although a negative effect on the number of coaching and administrative positions for women) and many have argued that such increases in participation are related to increasing gender equity in the United States. In 1979, the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) included article 10g, which specifically advocates the right to participate in sports. Gender equity campaigns and legislation in many countries have helped to increase women’s participation (e.g. in Canada, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) brought sports under the ambit of federal and provincial human rights codes). However, it was the emergence in the mid-1990s of lobby groups to advocate specifically for women’s rights in sport, most importantly the International Working Group on Women in Sport and Atlanta Plus, that have driven adherence to CEDAW and obliged patriarchal organizations such as the IOC to begin to deal with gender equity issues in sport.
Disability. The struggle for disability rights is contemporary with, but initially received less attention than other human rights movements. However, the organization of sports by and for athletes with a mental or a physical disability, culminating in the Special Olympics and the Paralympic Games, has resulted in a significant growth in participation. Many argue that the demonstration of skill and effort by athletes with a disability signals to able-bodied individuals the capacity and equality of those with a disability.
Sexuality. Sport has been considered as one of the most hostile environments for gay and lesbian athletes. However, in line with sexuality rights movements in various countries and the inclusion of sexuality in equity legislation, gay and lesbian sport teams and leagues have been established in many cities in the West and the organization of the Gay Games (and the recent alternative Out Games (Montreal, 2006)) to celebrate gay and lesbian sport have led to reports of slowly growing inclusion and less ‘compulsory heterosexuality’. National and international sport organizations have recently reached agreements on the inclusion of transgendered athletes in sports.
Aboriginal and racial minority. The growing aboriginal rights movements around the world have frequently attempted to revive traditional cultures, including physical cultures. This has sometimes led to the re-establishment of traditional games and games festivals (e.g. the Arctic Winter Games). However, aboriginal athletes also participate in modern sports and their accomplishments add immeasurably to community pride and possibly to the perceived status and equity struggles of aboriginal peoples.
The anti-apartheid movement was contemporary with, and preceded, other campaigns for racial human rights in sports. Leading up to the Mexico City Olympic Games, the Olympic Movement for Human Rights advocated a boycott, but ended with the sacrificial gesture of two United States black athletes on the podium. The campaign in the United States continues with Richard Lapchick’s annual racial report cards. In the United Kingdom, the Sporting Equals campaign continues the advocacy of racial rights, together with specific campaigns in cricket and football. Similar monitoring and campaign exist or are planned in a number of countries.
Children. Please see ‘Sport and Children’s Rights' in this issue.
Poverty. Social class is the ‘elephant in the room’ in terms of human rights, equity and sport participation. Even in developed nations there is a well-established linear relationship between income and participation in sport and physical activity. Poverty is the single greatest barrier to participation. Human rights and equity legislation deal quite well with categories of humans based on identity, as noted above; such legislation is much less effective in dealing with the material conditions of life. As Gary Armstrong notes with regard to the neighbourhood football programmes established in Liberia following the civil war, in a statement that resonates with both poverty and the MDGs (below), “rehabilitation and reintegration projects are doomed to fail if there is no better life offered to the disaffected demilitarized” (2006, p. 206).
Combination / the MDGs. The classes of persons listed above characterize people in terms of a single category. Since everyone has a gender, sexuality, race/ethnicity, age, social class and varying levels of ability/disability, classification in terms of a single category limits the opportunities for analysis of sport and human rights. The Millennium Development Goals, by taking into account poverty and social class, age, gender and health status, provide a limited combination of social structural categories. Leading up to 2005, the International Year of Sport and Physical Education, two major documents were produced relating sport and physical education to achievement of the MDGs (Swiss Agency for Development, 2005; United Nations, 2003). These documents argue, with limited evidence, that increased participation in sport will assist in the achievement of the MDGs. While increased participation is a worthy goal, it will be important to determine the specific circumstances under which such participation leads to the achievement of human rights.
Workers / athletes. More research attention has been directed to a somewhat different class of persons, those who work in the sports and sporting goods industries. The recognition that athletes must be afforded the same protections enjoyed by all citizens derives much of its moral and legal force from human rights legislation (cf. Kidd and Eberts, 1982; Barnes, 1996). However, the well-documented violations of athletes rights to health, freedom of speech (MacNeill, et al., 2001) and other well established human rights indicates that a different set of ‘working’ conditions appears to apply to those in professional and high performance sport (cf. Rhoden’s (2006) recent book referring to wealthy Black professional athletes in the U.S. as “$40 million slaves”).
Workers in the sporting goods industry have also received a great deal of attention in recent years, spearheaded by the anti-Nike campaign (Knight & Greenberg, 2002; Sage, 1999). Concerns about the export of jobs to low wage countries, sweatshop working conditions and child labour have resulted in a sustained campaign to monitor and improve the conditions for workers in the sporting goods and sport apparel industries. Some successes have been achieved in improving the workers’ right of those employed in the sports industries.

Conclusion
The achievement of human rights in terms of participation in sport has been mixed. Significant gains have been reported in the participation rates of women and persons with a disability. However, the Sport for All campaigns in Western nations appear to have stalled, often with significantly less than 50% of the population participating regularly, and renewed research efforts need to be made to determine the appropriate circumstances and policies that might lead to optimum realization of the right to participate in sport.
With regard to the achievement of human rights through sport, only in the anti-apartheid campaign did sport unequivocally assist in the achievement of racial equity in South Africa. In other cases, there is abundant anecdotal evidence of assumed relationships between participation in sport and the achievement of a broader range of human rights.
What is needed is much more systematic evidence of the circumstances under which the opportunity to participate in sport might result in learning the skills and motivation to win the struggle for human rights for various classes of persons.

References
ANC (1971). International boycott of apartheid sport. Paper prepared for the UN unit on apartheid. Retrieved from the African National Congress Archives: www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/aam/abdul-2.html
Armstrong, G. (2006). The lords of misrule: Football and the rights of the child in Liberia, West Africa. In D. McArdle & R. Giulianotti (eds.), Sport, civil liberties and human rights (pp. 181-210). London: Routledge.
Barnes, J. (1996). Sports and the law in Canada (3rd ed.). Toronto: Butterworths.
Donnelly, J. (1989). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Donnelly, P. & Kidd. B. (2006). Moral authority and the IOC: Steps for the future. Japan Journal of Sport Sociology, 12, pp. 15-24.
Giulianotti, R. (2006). Introduction. In, D. McArdle & R. Giulianotti (eds.), Sport, civil liberties and human rights (pp. 1-8). London: Routledge.
Guelke, A. (1993). Sport and the end of apartheid. In L. Allison (ed.), The changing politics of sport. (pp. 151-170) Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Hain, P. (1971). Don’t play with apartheid. London: Allen & Unwin.
International Olympic Committee (1997). Olympic charter. Lausanne: IOC.
Kidd, B. (1991). From quarantine to cure: The new phase in the struggle against
apartheid port. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8(1), 33-46.
Kidd, B. & Donnelly, P. (2000). Human rights in sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35(2), 131-148.
Kidd, B., & Eberts, M. (1982). Athletes’ rights in Canada. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Tourism and Recreation.
Knight, G., & Greenberg, J. (2002). Promotionalism and subpolitics: Nike and its labor critics. Management Communication Quarterly, 15 (4), 41-70.
MacNeill, M., Donnelly, P., & Knight, G. (2001). Corporate training: Identity construction, preparation for the Sydney Olympic Games, and relationships between Canadian media, swimmers and sponsors. Olympika, 10, 1-24.
Rhoden, W.C. (2006). $40 million slaves: The rise, fall and redemption of the Black athlete. New York: Crown Publishers.
Sage, G. (1999). JUSTICE! DO IT.... NIKE -- The Nike transnational advocacy network: Organization, collective actions, and outcomes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16 (3), 206-235.
Swiss Development Agency (2005). Sport for development and peace. Berne: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.
Thompson, S. (1988). Challenging the hegemony: New Zealand women’s opposition to rugby and the reproduction of a capitalist patriarchy. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 23(3), 205-212.
United Nations (2003). Sport for development and peace: Towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Report from the United Nations Inter-Agency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace. New York: Author.

Contact
Dr. Peter Donnelly
University of Toronto
Toronto, CANADA
Peter.donnelly@utoronto.ca

Dr. Bruce Kidd
University of Toronto
Toronto, CANADA
Bruce.kidd@utoronto.ca



Sport and Children's Rights
Peter Donnelly

 

Gender and racial discrimination are addressed by major UN Conventions, and those subject to such discrimination have enjoyed, to varying degrees, gains in human rights in general, and in sport in particular in part as a result of those Conventions. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which passed in 1989, has more signatory nations than any other Convention. However, to date, children remain the major class of persons who have enjoyed almost no increase in human rights in general, or in sport. National and international sport organizations have singularly failed to deal with issues regarding the human rights of children. As a consequence, some 14 Articles of the CRC are occasionally or routinely violated in sports. For example, Articles 28, 29 and 31 affirm children’s rights to education, leisure, recreation and cultural activities, while Articles 32, 34 and 36 prohibit various forms of exploitation. Article 12 specifically ensures the rights of children to their own opinions, an important consideration when we consider how rarely children are asked for an opinion, or even expected to have one, in organized sport programmes.
In addition to the need to realize children’s right to participate in sports, there are three major areas of concern with regard to children in sports:
  • Child labour in the sporting goods industries (Donnelly & Petherick, 2004);
  • The trafficking of children for the purposes of sport (Donnelly & Petherick, 2004); and
  • The treatment of children in high performance sport (Brackenridge, 2006; David, 1993, 2004; Donnelly, 1993, 1997).
The regulation of child labour in the sporting goods industry is the responsibility of both governments and corporations. The choice of sporting goods and uniforms, and the selection of sporting goods corporations as sponsors, are the responsibilities of national and international sport federations. The need to conform to the CRC by recognizing childhood as a period of growth and development, the regulation of conditions under which children practice and compete, and under which they are bought and sold (drafted, contracted, traded, etc.), are also responsibilities of governments, national and international sport federations and umbrella organizations such as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) (Donnelly & Petherick, 2004). The IOC has taken steps in recent years to achieve racial and gender equity in sports and to assist (through Olympic Solidarity) in the travel and training of athletes living in poverty. The status of children should be the next major international policy initiative in sport.

References
Brackenridge, C. (2006). Women and children first?: Child abuse and child protection in sport. In D. McArdle & R. Giulianotti (eds.), Sport, civil liberties and human rights (pp. 30-45). London: Routledge.
David, P. (1993). Children in sport: Exploitation or accomplishment? International Children’s Rights Monitor, 10(4), 8-12.
David, P. (2004). Human rights in youth sport. London: Routledge.
Donnelly, P. (1993). Problems associated with youth involvement in high performance sport. In B. Cahill & A. Pearl (eds.), Intensive participation in children’s sports (pp. 95-126) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Donnelly, P. (1997). Child labour, sport labour: Applying child labour laws to sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 32(4), 389-406.
Donnelly, P. & Petherick, L. (2004). Workers’ playtime?: Child labour at the extremes of the sporting spectrum. Sport in Society, 7(3), 301-321.


Contact
Dr. Peter Donnelly
University of Toronto
Toronto, CANADA
Peter.donnelly@utoronto.ca


Profile - Unite for Children Unite for Peace
In just the last decade, over 2 million children have been killed as a direct result of armed conflict and more than three times that number have been permanently disabled or seriously injured. An estimated 20 million children have been forced to flee their homes and hundreds of thousands of young boys and girls have been forced to serve as child soldiers.
Unite forChildren Unite for Peace has been launched to directly address these issues. The objective of this campaign, which UNICEF and FIFA brought
to the hundreds of millions of the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany, is to ensure that every child has the right to a peaceful world, free from conflict and abuse.
Football reaches more youth than any other recreational activity in the world. Football's magic touch is a worldwide phenomenon, making the sport more than just a game. It plays a major part in shaping culture in countries the world over. Harnessing the power of football, a universal language all children understand, can translate into an effective tool to combat violence and conflict, enabling children to grow up in more peaceful societies.
This campaign was born out of the strong bond FIFA and UNICEF developed over the last seven years and FIFA's continual generosity to help UNICEF achieve its mission of health, education, equality and protection for every child.
In 2004, for example, FIFA donated 1,200 'Sports-in-a-Box' recreation kits to UNICEF for countries affected by conflict. The donation helped each of these countries develop sport-related programming for peace education and peace-building.
To build on the success of that initiative, UNICEF and FIFA have come together once again to promote the Unite forChildren Unite for Peace theme, which encompasses a number of country programs and specifically focuses on global communications both during and following the 2006 FIFA World Cup. It will strive not only to promote peace internationally and nationally but to also reach deep into local communities and communicate with people on an individual level.
The campaign seeks to promote the values of peace and to address the widespread problem of violence and discrimination against children.

Contact:
Alison Qualter Berna
Sports for Development
Office of Public Partnerships
UNICEF
Three United Nations Plaza, rm 1134
New York, NY 10017
tel: +1 212 326 7553
fax: +1 646 797 0248
aqualter@unicef.org



Quote - Johann Olav Koss
 

"In North America we tend to take sport and play for granted. However when we look at areas of the world where children do not have guaranteed access to sport and play, we begin to realize the irreplaceable role that these activities have in the healthy development of children, not only physically but socially and emotionally. The United Nations recognition of the right of the child to engage in play and recreational activities places the proper level of importance on sport and play. It should not be a luxury or a privilege. Every child should have the right to play."

Johann Olav Koss
President and CEO, Right to Play



Profile - Sport for Development and Peace
International Working Group

Capitalizing on worldwide momentum being gained by the Sport for Development movement, the Sport for Development and Peace International Working Group (SDP IWG), first envisioned during the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens, was officially launched in 2005 as part of the activities under the International Year for Sport and Physical Education (IYSPE 2005). The SDP IWG is working towards the articulation and adoption of policy recommendations to incorporate sport and physical activity into development and foreign assistance strategies and programs. These policy recommendations will be presented at the 2008 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Beijing. Right To Play is the SDP IWG Secretariat.
"Many countries do not have national sports initiatives, and those that do often miss the opportunities created when sport and development programs collaborate," said UNDP Assistant Administrator, Mr. Bruce Jenks, Chair of the International Working Group. "With the policy tools it creates, the Sport for Development and Peace International Working Group will make it easier for these countries to set up their own sport programs and reap the development benefits."
The vision for the International Working Group evolved over the course of several years in conjunction with the growing recognition of sport as an important tool for development, health and peace. There is mounting evidence that providing more opportunities for children to play enhances their healthy physical, social and emotional development and builds stronger, more peaceful communities.

Contact:
Anna Alexandrova
SDP IWG
Manager Policy
Right to Play
65 Queen Street West, Thomson Building
Suite 1900, Box 64, Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2M5 CANADA
Phone: +1 416-498-1922
Email: IWGSecretariat@righttoplay.com



Multiculturalism and Universal Proclaimed Values in the Olympic Movement: An Approach to Human Rights and Sport Development?
Lamartine DaCosta, Neise Abreu & Ana Miragaya

 

The remark of multiculturalism embedded in Olympic sport may initially be examined harking back to Pierre de Coubertin's basic principles of international understanding and mutual respect as issued in the early 20th century. As yet, considering the present-day worldwide trend towards promoting cultural integration and diversification, the Olympic Movement and the Olympic Games are here understood to have an explicit engagement on cultural relativism. This paper aims at providing a theoretical basis for this typical relativism from multicultural assemblages in contrast to proclaimed Olympic universal values, in view of current debates on the needed universality of Human Rights for sport concerns.
In retrospect, Baron Pierre de Coubertin, with his principles of Enlightenment, began this Movement with the modern version of the Olympic Games. He successfully led an international congress in Paris 1894 to call upon participant nations in order to accomplish this restoration. After controversy and negotiations, a group of 10 nations decided to re-establish the Games, beginning in 1896. Henceforth, the so-called neo-Olympism appeared and Coubertin conceived it to meet a “philosophy of life” based on proclaimed universal values.
This intention of universality is one of the primordial characteristics of both the Olympic Movement as well as the Olympic Games, as far as they were grounded in the presupposed philosophical principles of Olympism. As initiator of the Olympic Movement, Coubertin developed, after 1894, a renewed doctrine based on the Ancient Olympic Games and oriented towards a social pedagogy, which supposedly could be adapted to any ethnic group or culture. In this sense, one of the main historians of Coubertin’s life, Yves Pierre Boulongne (1994, p. 22), divulges in one of his writings that the Olympic Congresses from 1897 to 1914 “defined the doctrine and promoted Olympism as a universal value”.
Nevertheless, the cultural relations established within the Olympic Movement led to an internationally understood implied meaning without explicitly promoting a discussion of the universal acceptance of the values of Olympism as related to the particular values of each culture. In other words, sports activities are taught and experienced in different ways in each society, according to the interpretations of the specific local culture.

Olympic universality
Coubertin’s multicultural vision of Olympism had a specific construction based on the intention of the universality of the Games and the Olympic Movement. In one of his texts from 1920 it was recorded that in the Olympic Games of London 1908, there was a “resolution to include not only all the nations but also all the games. All games, all nations” (Coubertin, 1920).
The Olympic Games of Athens (1896) started the process of baptism of Olympism. The second Olympiad (1900) in Paris revealed the modern character of the Games and the third Olympiad (Saint Louis, 1904) showed that ‘the universal trend of the movement became clear’ (p.10). The process of baptism was finally completed in London, four years later (1908). Thus, the expression “All games, all nations” is representative of the Olympic ideology, presupposed in this investigation and displayed in several texts, including one from 1911, in which Coubertin precisely reinforced the doctrine of ‘all games, all nations’, depicting for the first time a multicultural trait: “The fundamental rule of Modern Olympic Games is linked with two expressions: all games, all nations. The power to change this rule does not come from the International Olympic Committee. I would add to this explanation that a nation is necessarily an independent State and that there is a sport geography that can sometimes differentiate from the political geography”.
In other words, a multiple cultural approach for Coubertin was an implicit universal construction, but clearly founded on the distinction between nation and culture, according to the beliefs of that period. Again, a reexamination of the texts shows that the period between 1908 and 1924 can be considered by and large as the period when Coubertin approximated the concept of multiculturalism. This latter term, by the way, is from recent extraction, and the ‘all games, all nations’ doctrine seems to have dissolved when Coubertin withdrew from the presidency of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 1925.
However, the universal claim has been kept up to present day under several rationales of the IOC, including the option that it should be incorporated into the Olympic Charter. For instance, the Principles of the Olympic Charter (International Olympic Committee, 1997) clearly proclaim several values such as the second principle, which refers to the definition of Olympism as a movement which “seeks to create a way of life based on the joy found in effort, the educational value of good example and respect for universal fundamental ethical principles” (p.8). The seventh principle also demonstrates an assumption of universal values: “The activity of the Olympic Movement symbolized by five interlaced rings is universal and permanent. It covers the five continents. It reaches its peak with the bringing together of athletes of the world at the great sports festival, the Olympic Games” (p. 9).
Still in retrospective terms, DaCosta (2002) identified in the 1930s phase of the Olympic Movement not only an apparent multicultural focus but also a dominant eurocentrism. In sum, the motto “all sports, all nations” in the decade of the 1930s was under a different interpretation than Coubertin’s Olympism, as it passed from an eclectic concept to an outlined understanding based on limited ideological and political confrontations. Moving out from Coubertin’s lifetime to contemporary Olympic Movement facts, it is symptomatic that in many sessions promoted by the International Olympic Academy (IOA), Greece, there have been declared and explicit preoccupations with multiculturalism related to Olympism.
For instance, in the 33rd IOA Main Session, 1993, some representatives from the African continent questioned the fact that modern Olympism only values the practice of sports that are characteristic of the European continent. In the same session, a discussion emerged about the viability to commend universal human values of sport practice upon societies still full of racial, social and political conflicts (Abreu, 2002). In keeping with these debates, some principles proposed by Olympism continue to be distant conditions, since these principles are far from representing a singular sports culture. In this concern, there is a need to review the notion of multiculturalism facing the possible adoption of cultural relativism by the Olympic Movement as one of its main operational definitions. Additionally, the understanding of the formation of a multicultural group is often considered groundwork for the Olympic Education concerns.

Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism as a term has appeared very recently. According to many sources, this word emerged in the United States of America during the 1990s. At the beginning of the 1980s, the same expression appeared as a code to hide the word “race”. It became linked to the appearance of the language considered “politically correct”, established in that country to fit the social-economic minorities discriminated against by the developed nations’ market. Within this context, the expression ‘multiculturalism’ often gives the impression of a cultural mixture or cultural diversity, but it carries a ‘politically correct’ statement.
The anthropologist Eller (1997), focusing on the initial concept of multiculturalism, found similarities with the concept of anthropology; both terms contradict each other when they are treated under the concept of culture. Otherwise, paraphrasing another anthropologist (Cardoso, 1995), multiculturalism, under political and practical conceptualization in several domains, has formed, in some Western countries, debates and endless polemics. Multiculturalism has been confronted with different philosophies related to the way to promote equal opportunities. From these debates, concepts from several areas, like biology, sociology and anthropology, have emerged. Above all, multiculturalism found its roots and its theoretical stems in anthropology. Culture and cultural relativism concepts are indications of a multicultural approach in spite of different usage and ideological implications. Anthropology as a social science has been brought into relation with the development of multiculturalism and has also been influencing it. Yet, according to Eller, in a certain way multiculturalism is an applied anthropology. But, in spite of this proximity, the dialogue between both areas of knowledge has not been intense and sometimes their influences cannot be seen.
The increasing growth of heterogeneous societies (from the intensification of migrations, ethnic interactions, globalized intercultural relations and movements in favor of Human Rights) guides approaches that can not stem from traditional cultural concepts and traditional cultural relativism concepts. Facing these realities, the problematic culture concepts become indispensable and it is considered a collective elaboration, in continuous transformation.
Within this scenario, how are Olympic values going to be brought into discussion? How are proclaimed universal values going to be attached to cultural diversity? Epistemologically, to what future is it possible to guide these values? In this context, an attempt is needed to find solutions for economic and social inequality, including concepts such as multiculturalism, post modernity, ethnic and gender issues.
Eller’s concern (1997) towards this topic is related to the debate around the dangers of either adopting a multiculturalist’s point of view or an anti-multiculturalist’s point of view. First of all, the multiculturalists’ conception about multiculturalism is that several cultures living together can either destroy a country’s national identity or enhance the power of a nation with cultural diversities. Universal values are old attempts of Human Beings to create values accepted, absorbed and reproduced among all cultures - a kind of knowledge that is valid in any situation. While trying to relate multiculturalism to universalism, an adjoining line between the preservation of cultural characteristics and the good use of all the traditional and classic values stored by humankind is being drawn.
The impact on civilization of the rearrangement of the world order settles a collision between power and culture as well as the tendency to establish universal concepts. The political structure of some civilizations reacts against Western universalized concepts and transfers the presupposed established power to other representative issues such as the necessity of international understanding, preservation, inclusion and valorization of non-Western cultures. It does not mean that we have to get rid of philosophies proclaiming universal values, but we have to consider world conflicts and examine if certain paradigms do not have eternal validity.

Olympism developments
Historically speaking, Olympism has taken multiculturalism into consideration and this experience shows that a focus once adequate in a certain period of time may not be adequate in another period. A growing number of institutions, organizations, research centers and teachers are now debating multiculturalism and its influence in everyone’s life. Several channels are being used to make these groups meet, including schools, Internet and occasionally, Olympic Movement institutions.
Although many people consider Olympism a dogmatic theory and criticize it for its doctrinaire discourses, Olympism has changed its profile thanks to some scholars who advocate an applicable Olympism. Lining up with this model, Parry (1998) suggests the philosophical anthropology of Olympism promotes the ideal of individual, all round, harmonious human development; excellence and achievement; effort in competitive sporting activity; mutual respect, fairness, justice and equality; lasting personal human relationship of friendship; international relationships of peace, toleration and understanding; and cultural alliances with the arts.
With this proposal, Olympism embraces a variety of contemporary issues that cover some basic required conditions to be adjusted to our present world. Another proposal was developed by DaCosta (1998, p. 193) by understanding Olympism as a Progress Philosophy, a proposition generally defined today as a speculative construction of philosophical positions or directions yet without internal coherence, which asserts that reality is constantly in a process of change. Moreover, Parry and DaCosta link their interpretations of Olympism to the promotion of values.

Closing
In conclusion, it is worth mentioning another of DaCosta’s (1998, p. 198) arguments when one approaches dilemmas, paradoxes and overall constraints of the Olympic Movement worldwide nowadays:
“Then philosophically, the practical meaning of Olympism is more concerned with cultural claims than with scientific or pedagogical prescriptions. (…) In principle, while athleticism requires control in macro-relations, the symbolic identity of man in his pluralistic environment comprises values and contingent experiences in micro-relations, demanding a new approach to equilibrium after all.”
Regarding this interpretation, a concluding remark of the present review concerns the two-level differentiation of Olympism: while DaCosta had recommended a pluralistic and progressive adaptation to Olympic doctrine, MacAloon (1991) proposed in the same context of analysis “global interconnections” and “cultural differentiation”, both mutually adapted. An equivalent approach has Müller (1990), to whom Olympism progresses, keeping “immutable values” from its historical foundations and developing “updated values”. Coincidentally, Liponski (1987) envisaged present-day “Olympic Universalism” as opposed to “Olympic Pluralism”, prescribing a long-lasting process of introducing “to Olympism the cultural and philosophical experience of societies other than Western”.
Summarizing, this two-level approach suggests that each Olympic value must be submitted to an agreement involving a diversity of cultural understanding. In this case, a “universal” value should be an agreed value and not necessarily an outcome of Olympic and Coubertin’s traditions. This option for mutual understanding is more a philosophical problem than an anthropological contention related to cultural relativism. Finally, in terms of the current discussion emphasized on the initial proposition of this paper, should this suggestion be also applicable to Human Rights approaches in sport based on multiculturalism? Should we all be finally able to find a balance between the need of universal values and the respect to particular cultural identities?

References
ABREU, N. G. (2002). Multicultural responses to Olympism - an ethnographic research in Ancient Olympia, Greece. In DaCosta, L.P. (ed) Olympic Studies (pp. 201 – 254). Rio de Janeiro: University Gama Filho Press.
CARDOSO, C. M.N. (1995). Antropologia e Multiculturalismo. Setubal – Portugal: Escola Superior de Educacao de Setubal. Available online: esetbl@mail.telepac.pt
BOULONGNE, Y. P. (1994). Origins of the Olympic Idea in the Western World. In B. Jeu & Y.P. Boulongne (eds). For a Humanism of Sport (pp. 7 - 41). Paris: CNOSF-Editions Reune, EPS.
COUBERTIN, P. (1911). Geographie Sportive (Revue Olympique, pp. 51-52). In Müller, N. (1986) Pierre de Coubertin – Textes Choisis (Tome II, p. 452). Zurich: Weidmann.
COUBERTIN, P. (1920). L’Apport de la VIIeme Olympiade (La Revue Sportive Illustrée, no 3, p.10). In Müller, N. (1986) Pierre de Coubertin – Textes Choisis (Tome II, p. 265). Zurich: Weidmann.
DACOSTA, L. P. (1998). Olympism and the Equilibrium of Man. In N. Müller, N. (ed.) Coubertin and Olympism questions for the future (pp. 188 - 199). Germany: Schors Niederhansen.
DACOSTA, L. P. (2002). Olympic Studies (pp. 91 – 106). Rio de Janeiro: University Gama Filho Press.
ELLER, J. D. (1997). Anti-Anti-Multiculturalism. Denver: American Anthropologist Association, 99, no 2, 249-260.
LIPONSKI W. (1987). Olympic Universalism vs. Olympic Pluralism: Problems of Eurocentrism. In S. KANG, J. MACALOON, R.DAMATTA (eds). The Olympics and East/West and South/North Cultural Exchange (p. 517). Seoul: The Institute for Ethnological Studies, Hanyang University.
MACALOON J. (1991). The Turn of Two Centuries: Sport and the Politics of Intercultural Relations. In LANDRY, F., LANDRY, M. & YERLÈS, M. (eds). Sport...The Third Millennium (pp.31-44). Saint-Foy, Quebec: Les Presses de L’Université Laval.
MÜLLER, N. (1990). Olympism and Sport for All. IOA Book Report 29th session (pp.188-200). Ancient Olympia: IOA.
PARRY, J. (1998). The Values of Olympism and Sports Education for Tomorrow. Position Paper prepared for the 4th joint International Session for Directors of NOAs, members and staff of NOCs and IFs. Ancient Olympia: IOA.

Contact:
Dr. Lamartine DaCosta
Universidade Gama Filho, Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
lamartine@terra.com

Dr. Neise Abreu
Escola Americana, Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
neise.abreu@earj.com.br

Dr. Ana Miragaya
Universidade Gama Filho, Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
amiragaya@uol.com.br


Olympism and Human Rights:
Ideals in Action
Mary A. Hums & Eli A. Wolff
 

Introduction
This essay explores the potential for the philosophy and ideology of Olympism to serve as a real and practical vehicle to promote human rights within the arena of sport. Is it possible for a philosophy of life to exist as a functional catalyst for social change? This article defines and outlines the framework of Olympism, and the connection with the International Olympic Academy, the educational centre and home of the teachings of Olympism. The authors then explore the application of Olympism to promote human rights within sport, highlighting and analyzing specific initiatives and activities utilizing and embodying Olympism. This approach is in line with Bhuvanendra (1998/9), who stated, “As Olympism and human rights have the same philosophical profile, comparative teaching of these two concepts would be well received not only by the academic community but also by the practitioners of sport” (p. 19).

Sport and Human Rights
The United Nations began setting human rights standards in the mid-20th century. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood” (United Nations, 1948, p. 1).
Authors have linked sport and human rights throughout the years (Bhuvanendra, 1998/9; Kidd & Donnelly, 2000; Lapchick, 1975; McArdle & Giulianotti, 2003; Wolff & Hums, 2006). Documents of the International Olympic Committee are consistent with the United Nations philosophy on human rights. The Olympic Charter, the supreme governing document of the Olympic Movement, specifically states that “the practice of sport is a human right. Every individual must have the possibility of practising sport without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play” (International Olympic Committee, 2004, p. 9).

The Meaning of Olympism
When one hears the word “Olympism”, many things may come to mind. People may think of extraordinary athletes, inspiring performances, well-organized Games and medal stand anthems. What was the vision of Pierre de Coubertin, the founder of the modern Olympic movement? What is a definition of Olympism? According to the International Olympic Academy, “Olympism is a philosophy of life, where blending sport and culture with art and education aims to combine in balanced whole the human qualities of body, will and mind. Olympism is a way of life based on respect for human dignity and fundamental universal ethical principles, on the joy of effort and participation, on the educational role of good example, a way of life based on mutual understanding” (International Olympic Academy, 2006, p. 12). This definition goes hand in hand with the notion of respecting human rights.
The International Olympic Academy, located in Olympia, Greece, just five minutes walk from the archeological site of the ancient Olympic stadium, promotes the spirit of Olympism in modern times. “The International Olympic Academy functions as a multicultural and interdisciplinary centre that aims at studying, enriching and promoting Olympism” (International Olympic Academy, 2006, p. 6). Through sessions for young participants, post-graduate students, educators, National Olympic Academy directors/officials and sport journalists, the ideals of Olympism are presented, discussed and disseminated to people from around the world. The IOA itself reflects the spirit of Olympism where people from all over the world come together to live in peace and promote human rights.
In this modern age, perhaps one may think these notions seem a bit idealistic. How can we see the spirit of Olympism in action in today’s world? How does Olympism in sport remain alive today in a world where athletes and sport governing bodies must consider how to balance living in the temple or the agora? (Martinkova, 2006).

Examples of Olympism in Action
Examples of Olympism and human rights are present today just as they were in Pierre de Coubertin’s time. To quote de Coubertin, “Olympism is not a system, it is a state of mind. It can permeate a wide variety of modes of expression and no single race or era cam claim to have the monopoly of it” (International Olympic Academy, 2006, p. 6). Some current examples include the Olympic Truce, the IOC’s Women in Sport Commission, the International Paralympic Committee’s Position of the IPC on Human Rights and finally the actions of individual athletes.
The first example is the notion of the Olympic Truce. In ancient times, when the Games approached, the city states of ancient Greece declared a cessation of fighting so that the athletes, artists, pilgrims and their families could safely travel to and from the Games (International Olympic Committee, 2006a). This “Sacred Truce” formed the principle underlying today’s notion of the Olympic Truce. In 2001, the International Olympic Committee established the International Olympic Truce Foundation and the International Olympic Truce Centre. The Centre has locations in Lausanne, Athens and Olympia (International Olympic Truce Centre, n.d.). Through the Centre and the Foundation, the IOC aims to:
  • raise awareness and encourage political leaders to act in favour of peace;
  • mobilise youth for the promotion of the Olympic ideals;
  • establish contacts between communities in conflict;
  • offer humanitarian support in countries at war;
  • to create a window of opportunities for dialogue, reconciliation and the resolution of conflicts” (International Olympic Committee, 2006, Its Relevance for Today section).
In 2001, United Nations resolutions related to the modern notion of the Olympic Truce were endorsed by member nations. According to Secretary General Kofi Anan, “This calls for warring parties to lay down their arms while athletes from the entire community of nations meet under the noble flame of the Olympic torch” (United Nations, 2001, p. 1). Living without war would certainly be seen as a basic human right and in this way, the spirit of Olympism can be tied directly to preserving human rights. It is hoped that as the competing athletes can gather in peace, so too can the nations of the world.
As the Olympic Charter states, sport should be practiced without discrimination, and this would include discrimination based on sex. In 2004, the International Olympic Committee established the Women in Sport Commission. According to the International Olympic Committee (2006c, Mission section), “As a leader of the Olympic Movement, whose first objective is to promote Olympism and develop sport worldwide, the IOC has constantly played a complementary role to set up a positive trend to enhance women’s participation in sport at all levels, and especially in the last decades”. The programme and activities of this Commission include promotion of women and sport in the Olympic Games, promotion of women sport leaders, support activities and advocacy and information (International Olympic Committee, 2006b).
The ideals of Olympism can also link the Paralympic Movement and the Olympic Movement (Landry, 1995; Wolff, 2005). According to Wolff (2005, p. 4), “Given the emerging global understanding of the rights of persons with disabilities, Olympism and the Olympic Movement have a unique opportunity to lead the way towards the inclusion of persons with disabilities in all areas of life, particularly the Olympic arena.” The mission of the International Paralympic Committee contains the following phrase “To promote Paralympic sport without discrimination for political, religious, economic, disability, gender, sexual orientation or race reasons” (International Paralympic Committee, 2006, Vision and Mission section). In addition, in 2004 the International Paralympic Committee released its Position Statement of the IPC on Human Rights. This contains the following statement, “The IPC believes all individuals should enjoy access and opportunities for leisure, recreation, and sporting activities and such rights be granted and guarded by the legal and administrative systems by the responsible governments and communities” (International Paralympic Committee, 2004, p. 1). These statements are consistent with the notion of Olympism stated earlier in this article and illustrate how fundamental tenets of the Paralympic Movement reflect Olympism.

Athletes Promoting Olympism and Human Rights
In addition to examining the role of sport organizers and sport organizations in promoting human rights through Olympism, it is important to examine the contributions of athletes in promoting Olympism and human rights. Oftentimes, athletes can be the catalysts and voices bringing attention to human rights concerns and issues. Athletes are visible and the message of an athlete can have an important impact towards influencing social change (Wolff & Hums, 2006). Although athletes can be powerful change agents, athletes face pressures to conform and to not challenge the status quo. Athletes promoting Olympism and human rights uphold these values on and off the field, living Olympism as a philosophy of life.
Olympic sprinters John Carlos and Tommie Smith of the United States were early pioneers in the role of athletes to promote Olympism and human rights. Through the Olympic Project for Human Rights, these athletes symbolically protested discrimination and segregation of the black athlete. Norwegian Olympic speed skater Johann Olav Koss may be one of the most visible athlete ambassadors of human rights, founding Olympic Aid, now known as Right to Play, calling attention to the rights of children around the world to engage in sport and play activities and opportunities. Koss has emerged as one of the leading voices articulating the right to sport and play for all the youth of the world.
Olympians like United States rower Anita DeFrantz, whose efforts as Chair of the IOC Women in Sport Commission, promote equality of women in sport, and Canadian runner Bruce Kidd who worked to end apartheid in sport, connect Olympism to the promotion of human rights. These athletes have paved the way for current Olympians, like Paralympic Marathon and Athletics medalist Cheri Blauwet. to address the rights of persons with disabilities in sport, and Olympic speed skater Nathaniel Mills to articulate the importance of peace, humanity and universalism. The emergence of athlete human rights activists indicates the recognition by athletes of their positive role to promote human rights for all.

Conclusion
As these examples clearly illustrate, Olympism is an important framework for considering and promoting human rights. More than ideology, Olympism can become a practical and useful agent for social change in sport. Olympism can be useful within and beyond the Olympic Movement and has the potential to also be applicable in many aspects of life beyond sport. Examining Olympism and human rights will continue into the future, for as Cahill stated, “Therefore, whilst Olympism has achieved a degree of success for its human rights ideals, more attention will be required in the 21st century to the rights of humans – as athletes, as spectators, and as communities…” (Cahill, 1999, p. 3). Thus, the spirit of Olympism will continue to manifest itself in the form of actions to promote human rights.

References
Bhuvanendra, T.A. (December 1998- January 1999). Human rights in the realm of sport. Olympic Review, 26, 15-35.
Cahill, J. (1999). The ideals of Olympism. Proceedings of the Symposium on Sport and Human Rights, Sydney, Australia.
International Olympic Academy. (2006). International Olympic Academy. Athens, Greece: Author.
International Olympic Committee. (2004). Olympic charter. Lausanne, Switzerland: Author.
International Olympic Committee. (2006a). Olympic Truce – History. Retrieved 4 August 2006 from http://www.olympic.org/uk/organisation/missions/truce/truce_uk.asp.
International Olympic Committee. (2006b). Programme and activities. Retrieved on 4 August 2006 from http://www.olympic.org/uk/organisation/missions/ women/activities/index_uk.asp.
International Olympic Committee. (2006c). Promotion of women in sport. Retrieved on 5 August 2006 from http://www.olympic.org/uk/organisation/missions/ women/index_uk.asp.
International Olympic Truce Centre. (n.d.). The Foundation and the Centre. Retrieved 5 August 2006 from http://www.olympictruce.org/html/centrpt1.html
International Paralympic Committee. (2004). Position statement of the IPC on human rights. Retrieved 4 August 2006 from http://www.paralympic.org/release/ Main_Sections_Menu/News/Paralympic_News/Days/IPC_Position_Statement_HR.pdf.
International Paralympic Committee. (2006). Vision and mission. Retrieved 4 August 2006 from http://www.paralympic.org/release/Main_Sections_Menu/ IPC/About_the_IPC/Vision_and_Mission/.
Kidd, B., & Donnelly, P. (2000). Human rights in sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35(2), 131–148.
Landy, F. (1995). Paralympic Games and social integration. In M. de Morgas Sta & M. Botella (Eds.). The keys of success: The social, sporting, economic, and communications impact of Barcelona ’92. Bellaterra: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Automona de Barcelona.
Lapchick, R. (1975). The politics of race and international sport: The case of South Africa. Greenwood Press.
Martinkova, I. (2006, July). The ethics of human performance. Address given at the International Olympic Academy 7th International Session for Educators and Officials of Higher Institutes of Physical Education, Olympia, Greece.
McArdle, D., & Giulianotti, R. (2003). Sport and human rights in the global society. London: Routledge.
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. New York, NY: Author.
United Nations. (2001, July 5). Secretary General says Olympic Truce can offer window of time to open dialogue and pause to relieve suffering. Retrieved 5 August 2006 from http://www.un.org/news/Press/docs/2001/sgsm7797.doc.htm.
Wolff, E.A. (2005). Olympians with disabilities and the 2004 Athens Games: Triumphs,
challenges, and future opportunities.
Athens, Greece: International Olympic Academy.
Wolff, E.A., & Hums, M.A. (2006). Sport and human rights. The Chronicle of Kinesiology & Physical Education in Higher Education, 17(2), 3-4.

Contact:
Dr. Mary A. Hums
University of Louisville
USA
Mhums@louisville.edu

Eli A. Wolff
Northeastern University Center for the Study of Sport in Society
Boston
USA
e.wolff@neu.edu



Quote - Dr. Richard Lapchick
 

"The promotion of human rights throughout sport continues to be highly relevant in all corners of the world. Although we have made and continue to make progress towards a peaceful society, we must further our efforts to push the envelope and advocate for the rights of every citizen."

Dr. Richard Lapchick
Director, DeVos Sports Business Management Program, University of Central Florida



Paths for Women and Men Towards Human Rights in Sport: The Same, Delayed or Divergent?
Carole Oglesby
 

Introduction
In 1975, the picture in regard to sports rights and equity for women in the USA seemed to be altering for the better. This was the year our federal education program equity steps began to be enacted. Three years earlier, when the landmark Title IX law was actually passed, I had been named to the Executive Board of the group that oversaw the World University Games program in the United States. In the summer of 1975, I attended the World University Games event (a track meet) in Rome, Italy. In the hustle and bustle accompanying the pre-event preparation of a national team for an international event, by default I was assigned to be the “USA Representative to the General Assembly” (governing body of World University Games, FISU). I don’t remember any other women being there in a room of about 100 other country representatives.
Having been a national level participant in softball and leader in national college level sports in the USA, I was keenly aware of the frequent (virtually universal) phenomenon of women’s sport being overseen by men. It seemed to me, rooted as I was in a context of civil rights advocacy for women in sport, that FISU policy and practice was grossly unfair towards women, cutting itself off from the resources of highly qualified women in roles of coach, athletic trainer, team doctor, chef de mission, national representative, game official and others. Thus, although I was quite sure my male colleagues expected me to go to the General Assembly and sit quietly, I was unable to allow this opportunity pass. As the meeting drew to a close, President Primo Nebiolo scanned the Assembly with a final call for “any further business” and I raised my hand. I walked to the microphone and delivered a two-minute pitch for increasing the role of women in the FISU movement. The audience sat in stunned silence and President Nebiolo was livid. As I sat down, he made a comment in Italian to the group (I was told later it was simply “unflattering to women”) and sadly he took out his fury on my male compatriots whom he accused of high stupidity for allowing such a woman in a public role.
It was a classic vignette of the times 30 years ago, but it does illustrate a crucial observation in regard to “human rights.” I felt the FISU movement was “flawed” in that many barriers blocked women from leadership and the result was injustice. Dr. Nebiolo, the Founder of FISU (now deceased) felt I had violated his human rights in that I had introduced “politics” into the world he had created; a world he thought should be free of the “profane political issues” that divide people. How could the two of us view our human rights so differently? While the “ideal,” or the theory, of certain “inalienable human rights” is a universal (etic phenomenon in linguistics), the concrete enactment of our rights is highly time and culture bound (emic). Only in the context of international treaty bodies creating instruments, then ratified by hundreds of countries with built-in self and other monitoring and reporting systems, do we actually begin to see “universal” human rights emerge. The history of the past six decades in the United Nations’ (UN) system gives evidence of a continual expansion, differentiation and increasing specificity of attention to the role of physical recreation and leisure in human development as a human right. Consistently, the benefits to be derived from such lifespan physical activity were initially conceived to be neither necessary nor valuable for women, young girls, older women, or those with disabilities.
Within the United Nations system, Schuler (1995) notes a strong international consensus has evolved and expanded to cover a “growing field of vital concerns and threats to human dignity” (p.2). With the texts and activities advanced through the UN Year of Sport and Physical Education in 2005 and the Secretary General’s Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace, sport can be said to be a new focal human right. The question remains - in what sense is access to sport/physical recreation and its benefits universal and in what sense is it “privileged?”
The dynamic character of human rights concepts must be recognized based on a combination of factors such as evolving definitions of human rights, emerging forms of human relationships, new political forces and technological changes (Schuler, 1995). Feminist scholars and activists (men and women alike) have coined phrases such as “engendering human rights” in order to raise awareness and stimulate action towards three goals:
  1. expand definitions of human rights to include previously neglected groups, especially women;
  2. expand the scope of state responsibility for achieving these rights;
  3. expanding the effectiveness of state and international systems to enforce the enabling of their rights (Schuler, 1995).
While these words were intended to describe the general context of women’s rights as human rights, there are innumerable examples of their exemplification in the sport area.
The ensuing text explores three themes: (a) a brief description of the basis of “play/sport as a human right” within UN treaties and conventions; (b) the Olympic Movement as an NGO (non-governmental organization) actor within human rights systems; and (c) evidence suggesting “sport as a universal human right” is part illusion for women.

Play/Sport as a Basic Human Right
The trajectory of expansion and elaboration of human rights in sport/physical activity is continual as the various task forces and committees of the UN system have generally met annually in attempts to perfect attainment of the broad goals of the treaties and conventions. Focal points along the path can be identified from 1948 (when the process began) to the 1978/79 conventions, to the decade of special action on women’s issues 1995-2005 and the 2005/06 period in which the spotlight falls dramatically upon sport.
In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the UN General Assembly, setting out a framework of rights and duties in the broadest dimensions. Article 1 characterizes all individuals as born free and equal in dignity and rights. The second article describes the entitlements holding without discrimination of many types, including sex. Article 24 calls for the right to rest and leisure to all, while Article 27 enumerates the right to participate in the cultural life of the community (Koenig, 2000).
Three documents prepared in 1978/79 served to particularize the rights accruing from those identified previously as universal. UN bodies issued “The Convention of the Rights of the Child” and “The Convention on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women” (CEDAW) (Koenig, 2000). Children (ostensibly boys and girls alike), were to be granted an education “to prepare for an active adult life…” (p. 70). Children were also granted access to leisure, recreation and cultural activities (Koenig, 2000).
Within the CEDAW framework, two statutes directly mention physical activity and one of the more general statues can be seen as relevant to the discussion. Part III, Article 10 guarantees education equality between men and women including the same opportunities to participate actively in sports and physical education (United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women, 2006). Article 13 identifies the right to participate in recreational activities, sports and all aspects of cultural life. Article 10 contains language calling for the elimination of stereotypical roles of men and women at all levels and in all forms of education. Denial of women’s access to sport/physical activity has been related to stereotypical views of the needs and interests of men and women (International Working Group on Women in Sport, n.d.).
The 1978 Charter on Physical Education and Sport came from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The framers enshrined the notion that the exercise of human rights is predicated on the freedom to develop and preserve one’s physical, intellectual and moral powers and that access to physical education and sport should be guaranteed for all (UNESCO, 1978).
In the period 1995-2005, documents emanating from the 4th World Conference on Women held in Beijing (referred to as the Platform for Action or PFA) and the Beijing+5 Outcomes Document took center stage. As Koenig (2000) states, “The Beijing Platform for Action, prepared and approved by delegates of all governments present at the Conference, is the most complete document produced by the UN relating to women’s rights” (p. 9). Although direct and indirect references to sport/physical activity benefits are scattered throughout the 12 areas of concern addressed in the Platform for Action and Beijing+5 Outcomes, in the interest of brevity, I only mention the three direct application statements in the PFA:
  1. B4, 83 m Education and training of women – Provide accessible recreation and sports facilities…for girls and women of all ages, support the advancement of women in all areas of athletics and physical activity including coaching, training and administration;
  2. C2, 107 f Health – create and support programs in education, workplace and community to make opportunities to participate in sport, physical activity and recreation on the same basis as available for men and boys;
  3. Girlchild L4, 280 d – Promote the full and equal participation of girls in extra curricular activities such as sports, drama and cultural activities.
By 2004, the UN Inter-agency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace had been created and illustrated the mainstreaming of girls and women’s concerns in a general initiative. A key concern of the Task Force has been the facilitation of the Millennium Development Goals 11 (MDG) of the UN. All of the MDGs impact girls and women and two (maternal health and the empowerment of women) address concerns directly. Sport and physical activity will increasingly be utilized as vehicles for the attainment of MDGs in diverse ways including the following: incorporation of sport in comprehensive development planning; establishment of partnerships within the UN, IOC, sport sector, NGOs and the corporate world; encouragement of the media to actively promote sport for development (UNICEF, n.d.).

The Olympic Movement as an NGO Actor
The identification of sport as an important tool in the civil society search for development and peace must not be seen as a cosmic accident. Sport scholars have, for decades, been producing an important body of evidence for the benefits of life-long participation in sport/physical activity. Many have, individually and collectively, taken “evidence-based advocacy” to the keepers of the Olympic flame as well as policy makers in governments around the world (Oglesby, 2002). The IOC describes itself now as an international NGO in a time when the non-governmental and corporate sectors have become crucial in the effort for an equitable and peaceful world (Bonbright, 2004; Karajkov, 2006).
The IOC posits itself as a “family”, encompassing in its two arms virtually the family of (hu)man. The more familiar arm, the Olympic Games organizational structures, includes the IOC, the International Federations, the National Olympic Committees, the Organizing Committees of each game manifestation, athlete coaches, judges, associations and clubs out of which athletes develop (International Olympic Committee, n.d.). The other arm of the Olympic Movement is Olympism; a less formal use of the various structures to promulgate an overarching philosophy of sport for all. The texts regarding Olympism are perhaps familiar to us: “Olympism is a philosophy of life exalting and combining in a balance whole the qualities of body, mind and will; Olympism places sport at the service of harmonious development including knowledge, competitive spirit, excellence, fair play” (International Olympic Committee, 2004). As we have seen, the admonition of Olympism that the practice of sport is a human right to which all must have the possibility of access, is not new. What is relatively new, however, is the intentional collaboration of the Olympic Movement with the UN, UNESCO and WHO to bring sport to the service of real, concrete development through sport as a tool for local, community, economic development projects, HIV/AIDS education, humanitarian assistance and more (International Olympic Committee, 2006).
The 2004, 10th World Sport for All Congress, an activity of the Sport for All Commission of the IOC, concluded with a declaration enumerating the most important considerations when viewing the benefits of sport for all. These were categorized in areas of health, social and economic benefits and touched on matters such as increased sense of well-being and identity; social skill development; social cohesion; and preventive protection for a variety of diseases of chronic inactivity with a resultant benefit of better quality of life and reduced societal health care costs.
Perhaps Secretary General Kofi Annan expressed the recognition of the power of sport as a development tool best:
“Beyond physical well-being, sport can play an important role for a safer, more prosperous and peaceful society, through its educational values and worldwide network…sport can help bridge cultural and ethnic divides, create jobs and businesses, promote tolerance and non-discrimination, reinforce social integration and advocate healthy lifestyles” (International Olympic Committee, 2006).

In a world where sport is tasked to accomplish all of that, access to its benefits must absolutely be a full and complete right.

Sport for Women: A Universal Right or Illusion?
Before any human rights violation can be challenged and eradicated, it must be recognized. It is well beyond the scope of this paper to document the illusory aspects of a concept such as the universal right of girls and women to sport. This conscious-raising and documenting task has been carried out through the four world conferences on women and sport of The International Working Group (web site = www.iwg-gti.org/e/index.htm), actions of international organizations such as Women Sport International (web site = www.womensportinternational.org) and national organizations such as the Women’s Sports Foundation of the USA (web site = www.womenssportfoundation.org). The Brighten Declaration, serving as a veritable declaration of human rights for women in sport, has now been ratified by 280 organizations in over 100 countries. However, two prime examples of past, and continuing, human rights violations structurally affecting the universal right of girls and women to sport are (a) the low levels of women in sport leadership and (b) sexual harassment in sport.

Women in Leadership in the Olympic Movement
The IOC has accepted/recognized the rhetoric and data coming from its own Working Group on Women (now a Commission) and the aforementioned groups insisting that women’s sport experience is neither full nor complete if it ends at participant levels. Prior to the mid-1990s, it was the rare woman who was an IOC member (Princess Ann of Great Britain). To its credit, the IOC set goals for its constituent bodies in regard to women’s leadership participation. An extensive study by the Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy at Loughborough University, UK has produced an extensive data set of which the following table is the barest beginning.

Women in Sport Leadership – Olympic Movement
Dec. 2004

National Olympic Committees # %
More than 20% women on their Board 54 29.3%
Met the previous 10% target 125 67.9%
Have at least one woman on their Board 181 98.4%


International Federations # %
Have more than 20% women on their Board 10 29%
Have met the previous 10% target 19 54%
Have at least one woman on their Board 32 91%


NOC Continental Associations’ Board Membership
  Women Men % of Women
ANOC-General 1 25 3.8
ANOCA (Africa) 1 13 7.1
EOC (Europe) 2 14 12.5
OCA (Asia) 2 20 9.1
PASO (Pan Amer) 2 15 11.8
ONOC (Oceania) 1 9 10.0


A study of the barriers that account for such data (and reams of other data that have been compiled internationally and country by country) as well as of the suggested means of overcoming difficulties, form the way ahead. It is heartening to see small, but positive, steps and commitments being made to move more rapidly.

Violations through Sexual Harassment in Sport
Within the realm of sport, sexual harassment was seldom spoken of, and certainly never researched, until the past 15 years. Pioneers such as Brackenridge, Leahy, Kirby and Greaves, Fasting and Sundgot-Borgen have lead the way in shining a light on this topic of concern. Their research, only touched on in this paper, carefully documents that (a) sexual harassment in sport exists; (b) both women and men are harassed; (c) women are harassed significantly more often; and (d) harassers are most often (though not always) men. Data from studies in Canada, Australia, United States and Norway indicate between 22% and 45% of women sport participants experience sexual harassment.
The researchers are careful to point out potential flaws in their own research due to factors such as variation in definitional understanding of concepts, sampling problems, ethics and consent difficulties, underreporting/non responses and other factors. (Brackenridge, 2001; Fasting, Brackenridge, & Sundgot-Borgen, 2003). The purpose of noting these excerpts from major works (even with some flaws) is to indicate the importance of our commitment, within a human rights framework, to take note of the need to safeguard women and children through clearer definitions of harassment, abuse, appropriate and inappropriate behaviors within the sport context.
The paths for women and men towards human rights in sport have been presented here as the same when seen in broad, theoretical strokes, and delayed for women as we look at the timelines for the appearance of national/international level policy related to the rights of women. The divergences appear when we take the lens of the microscope to the level of on-the-ground programs. The creativity and persistence of sport scholars, activists, teachers, coaches and interested volunteers is challenged when they attempt to create action programs that overcome economic, tradition and culture barriers and attract girls and women to a sphere only recently opened to them.
But we are on the path.

References
Abaka, C. (1999). Framework for a human rights approach to women’s health: the work of the CEDAW Committee. Retrieved 10 September 2006 from www.un.org/womenwatch/DAW/CSW/rights.htm
Brachenridge, (2001). Spoilsports: Understanding and preventing sexual exploitation in sport. London: Rutledge.
Bonbright, D. (2004). A justice oriented global civic society intrastructure: Vision or Illusion. Civicus. Retrieved 19 September 2006 from www.civicus.org.
Fasting, I., Brackenridge, C., & Sundgot-Borgen, J. (2003). Experiences of sexual harassment and abuse among Norwegian elite female athletes and non-athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 74, (1), 74-97.
International Olympic Committee. (n.d.). Olympic Movement. Retrieved 10 September 2006 from http://www.olympic.org/uk/organisation/movement/index_uk.asp.
International Olympic Committee. (2004). The Olympic Charter. Lausaunne, Switzerland: Author.
International Olympic Committee. (2006, January 24). News about development through sport. Retrieved from http://www.olympic.org/uk/organisation/missions/ humanitarian/full_story_uk.asp?id=1610.
International Working Group on Women and Sport. (n.d.). Brighton Declaration. Retrieved 10 September 2006 from www.iwg-gti.org Brighton Declaration.
Karajkov, R. (2006). NGO’s: Who else will do the work. Retrieved 10 September 2006 from www.worldpress.org/europe/2415.cfm.
Koenig, S. (2000). A human rights resource packet, New York, NY: Peoples Decade for Human Rights Education.
Oglesby, C. (2002). Evidence-based advocacy and women in sport/physical activity. Paper delivered at Div. 47 award lecture, Annual Convention of America Psychological Association.
UNESCO. (1978). International charter of physical education and sport. Paris, France: Author.
UNICEF. (n.d.). UNICEF. Girls' education campaigns. Retrieved 9 September 2006 from http://www.unicef.org/girlseducation/campaign_sport_education_girls.html.
United Nations (2004). Sport for development and peace: towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Inter-agency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace.
United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women. (2006). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Retrieved 8 September 2006 from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/.

Contact:
Dr. Carole Oglesby
WomenSport International (WSI)
California State University
USA
carole.oglesby@csun.edu



The Politics of Race and Sport in the Promotion of Human Rights
Doris R.Corbett
 

Abstract
The article will examine the role sport has played in the struggle to secure equality of opportunity and human rights for the underclass in the context of political significance, social order and cultural protest. The author will discuss the social lineage and the limitations of ethnic and racial confrontation through sport to promote human rights. The writer makes the case that an examination of identity, culture and popular culture must be taken into account when looking at sport and the promotion of human rights.

Introduction
A discourse on the politics of race and sport in the promotion of human rights is essential. A conceptual framework to explore the significance of the politics of race and competitive sport in the promotion of human rights is evident in the remarks made by filmmaker Spike Lee. Spike Lee states…
You’re black, you’re a young male, and all you’re supposed to do is deal drugs and mug women. The only reason why you’re here is because you can make their team win. If their teams win, these schools get a lot of money. This whole thing is revolving around money. (Film-maker Spike Lee, in Joravsky 1995, p. 219)

The race issues in society are the framework for this article. The realities of racism and discrimination in the United States are well documented. Thus, the race problems in the United States at large cannot be ignored in an analysis of sport in connection to human rights issues.
The forecast for resolving the race dilemma of the United States, particularly discrimination against African-Americans, is bleak. Examples of racism are present across the country. Consider the video-taped police beatings in 1992 of Rodney King in Los Angeles or Robert Davis, a retired teacher injured during a videotaped beating by New Orleans police in the aftermath of Katrina. Video-taped examples of police officers using excessive force beating African-Americans reveal the realities of existing discrimination. Such incidents create awareness of police misconduct and the prevalence of racism in United States society. These events, although not sport related, reflect the social conditions and political climate in the United States.
The people of the United States could not overlook the racial undertones unmistakable in the recent weather catastrophes, which occurred in the country’s South. Because of racism and the devaluation of African-American lives, hundreds of people drowned and starved in New Orleans in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina (Daley, 2006, p.1; Giroux, 2006, p. 1; Ignatieff, 2005, p.1-4). Sensitive viewers of the Katrina catastrophes did not miss the language used to describe the victims of the storm as refugees, thus liking their displacement as comparable to that of foreigners immigrating to the United States. And, for the overwhelmingly African-American Katrina “refugees” or displaced victims who were huddled in the Houston Astrodome on September 5th, former first lady, Barbara Bush said of them in a radio interview that “…so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this (she chuckles) is working very well for them” (Clark, 2005, p.1; The New York Times, 2005, p.A22). One can only wonder how anyone, regardless of their social-economic status, could feel such conditions were working very well for them when they are without homes, jobs, family and friends, and were without the basic necessities for days.
Just weeks following Mrs. Bush’s unsympathetic remarks, former Drug Czar and former education secretary William Bennett told a caller to his syndicated radio talk show: "If you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every black baby in this country and your crime rate would go down…That would be an impossibly ridiculous and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down" (Gentry, 2005, p.1). These examples reflect the hypocrisy and cruelty permeating the daily lives of African-Americans. The Bush and Bennett examples represent perspectives grounded in an historical and philosophical point of view, suggesting that African-Americans are lazy and deserve the conditions they find themselves in, just as rich people are virtuous and are rewarded by God for their hard work.
In the language of Lyndon Johnson, Bush ascribed the violence and desperation seen in New Orleans in the days after Hurricane Katrina to “deep, persistent poverty in this region. . . . That poverty has roots in a history of racial discrimination, which cut off generations from the opportunity of America.” The president then issued a call to the nation: “We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action. . . . Let us rise above the legacy of inequality” (Avlon, 2005, p2).
Indeed, society in the United States has a rich and long history of racial injustices. At an earlier time, a system of legalized segregation subjected African-Americans to educational, social, political and economic injustices. Racism is responsible for the evolution of an organized system of practices and policies intended to create racial inequality. In this context, two historical periods were constructed, the Old and New American dilemma (Jones, 1998).
The Old American dilemma (i.e. before the 1960s Civil Rights era) was characterized by moral agitation and apprehension over the struggle of right versus wrong. This was a time of blatant racial segregation and denial of basic civil and human rights as human-kind willfully cultivated and institutionalized human rights violations as a legitimate construct of society. The New American dilemma (i.e. late 1960s to present day) is symbolized by a moral conflict between right versus wrong and race-neutral and race-conscious social policies (Jones, 1998). This era has witnessed a context in which human rights were secured as a result of legislation and judicial decision. There exists today a sense of moral uncertainty as to whether there is a genuine societal commitment to racial and human rights equality.
The Role Sport Plays to Secure Equality of Opportunity and Human Rights
Social science of sport scholars has traditionally avoided using critical race theory to analyze social justice and racial equality issues in sport. Sport social scientists have, for the most part, avoided asking tough fundamental questions involving elite sports and their role in the promotion of human rights. Does participation in certain competitive sports (i.e. basketball, football and track and field) put some racial group members (particularly, the Black athlete) at risk academically? Are Black athletes intentionally socialized to focus more on sport rather than the pursuit of other life opportunities in order to keep them in their place? Are Black athletes systematically subjected to institutional, economic and commercial exploitation? Do athletes of color have basic economic, social and cultural opportunities to access sports such as tennis, golf, skating, gymnastics, lacrosse, soccer, ice hockey and swimming? Does participation in elite National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I intercollegiate basketball and American style football warrant athletic compensation to athletes beyond the current traditional scholarship awards and payments for tuition and housing? Does intensive sport training qualify as physical abuse and is the training conducted at the expense of the overall health and well-being of the athlete? In comparison to athletes in other environments, are African-American basketball and American style football athletes more frequently subjected to extreme levels of physical and mental abuse? Should promising high school African-American basketball or American style football players be hustled by companies who want to put them under contract or traded between teams for thousands of dollars without being properly informed and consulted? Although Black athletes dominate the sports of basketball and American style football, why are they less visible in board rooms and front offices of sporting institutions at all levels of sport?
These questions about human rights have become increasingly controversial. Like most topics requiring candor, respect and tolerance, the subject of human rights as it relates to sport has not been openly debated and researched. Many questions are off-limits and swept under the rug, while others are being gently addressed and given polite attention. Sports authorities both private and public have avoided the debate concerning the rights-based dimensions of race and sports in the promotion of human rights.
Charles Farrell, Director, Rainbow Coalition for Fairness in Athletics, says:
Athletics is to the Black community what technology is to the Japanese and what oil is to the Arabs. We’re allowing that commodity to be exploited… We really need to turn it around… if those schools cannot do for us what we need done i.e. provide an education for the next generation, and then we should be looking to steer clear of those institutions (Harris & Curry, 1997, p.311-319).
Respecting human rights is not an option for sport authorities, it should be an obligation. But what exactly is meant by the expression “human rights?” In the context of this article, the definition of human rights is taken from the Human Rights Resource Center (Doise, 2003, p. 1-2):
Human Rights are those basic standards without which people cannot live in dignity. To violate someone’s human rights is to treat that person as though she or he were not a human being. Human Rights allows for certain standards of life or treatment which are believed to belong to every person and individual? It is the right to life, freedom and human dignity?
Because sport mirrors society, sport is not free from discrimination. Sport has universal human rights value and is a social movement striving to contribute to the development of a peaceful and better world. Society expects many important and worthwhile things from sport and uses sport to support various fundamental human rights, social values and ethical principles such as equality for all people, fair play, respect for the loser, friendship, solidarity, justice and democracy, international peace and understanding. In contrast, sport also values elitism, nationalism, gender equality and the scientific manufacture of winners.
George Sage makes the point that:
Sport in modern societies is one of the means by which nation-states socialize their citizens, transmitting the symbolic codes of the dominant culture and inducing citizens toward conformity to beliefs and values that prevail in the wider society. At the same time, sport is one of the most salient moulders of national collective ------identity (Sage, 1998, p.116).
Michael Jordan, for example, appeals to many corporate sponsors because of his family oriented, wholesome, all-American image and he is the antithesis of the stereotypical threatening Black masculinity so often represented by the media. For many African-Americans there is a need to disown any obvious manifestation of, or reference to, one’s Blackness as a strategy for obtaining acceptance as opposed to alienating “mainstream America”. In the United States, culture and industries have promoted certain images of Blackness, African-Americans and people of color in general. Hoberman (1997) writes that for the Black athlete, it is commonly understood that if you’re going to be a genuine sports hero in this country, a Babe Ruth, DiMaggio or Palmer, you have to keep your political views to yourself. Arthur Ashe shrewdly noted, “Advertisers want somebody who’s politically neutered” (Hoberman, 1997, p. 31-32).

Race and Human Rights: The Political and Symbolic Power of Sports
The need for sports to promote human rights is exemplified by the racial, ethnic and international overtones prevalent in the Olympic Games and many other national and international sporting events. For example, in 1938 the Louis-Schmeling boxing fight was connected to racial and political human rights issues. Hitler preached about the racial superiority of Aryans and conveniently portrayed Schmeling as a symbol of that superiority. Just weeks before the Louis and Schmeling rematch, Joe Louis visited President Franklin Delano Roosevelt at the White House and The New York Times quoted Roosevelt as telling the fighter, “Joe, we need muscles like yours to beat Germany” (Cassidy, 2005, p.5). In his 1976 biography, Louis wrote, “I knew I had to get Schmeling good. I had my own personal reasons and the whole damned country was depending on me” (Cassidy, 2005, p.5). Similarly, Jack Johnson who was musical, well-read and literate in five languages and a protagonist of Black civil rights also challenged the status quo. Muhammad Ali became a Muslim and refused induction into the army. As a result, his fights and licenses were cancelled and in 1967 he was sentenced to imprisonment and stripped of his titles. Ali did not politicize boxing but drew attention to Black oppression and was outspoken about his views on Vietnam. Fortunately, in 1970 the Supreme Court was unanimous in setting aside Ali’s conviction.
Sport does mirror and reflect our moral conscious. The 30 nation boycott of the Montreal Olympic Games in 1976, the 61 nation stay-away from Moscow in 1980 and the victory stand demonstrations at the 1968 (Mexico City) and 1972 (Munich) Olympic Games reflect on the social and human rights abuses often felt by African-Americans and the Jewish people. The politics of race and sport in the promotion of human rights is epitomized by the terrorism and killing that took place in Munich in 1972, by the 50 Hungarians who sought refuge during the 1956 Olympic Games, the anti-soviet riots in Czechoslovakia in 1969, South Africa’s apartheid policy and the 1970 “Soccer War” between Honduras and El Salvador. Sport and human rights have always been interconnected, particularly where society’s reputation or national pride were at stake (Corbett, 1999). The Nazis, for example, were quite outspokenly anti-internationalist and racist in the 1930s, particularly toward Jewish people and Negroes. On the occasion of the 1932 Olympics, the official Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter (1932) editorialized:
Negroes have no business at the Olympics. Today we witness that free white men have to compete with the unfree Negro. This is a debasement of the Olympic idea beyond comparison... The next Olympics will be held in Berlin in 1936. We hope that the responsible men know what will be their duty. The blacks have to be expelled. We demand it (August 19, 1932)!
The Olympic Committee on Human Rights (OCHR) played an active role in the 1968 Mexico City Olympic Games and the now famous Black athlete protest and attempted boycott. At the 1968 Olympic Games, Black athletes wore black arm bands, black gloves, a black scarf around the neck and knee-length black socks to protest the injustice to Blacks in the United States. Tommy Smith, in explaining the symbolism of his and John Carlos’s action, stated that:
I wore a black right-hand glove and Carlos wore the left-hand glove of the same pair. My raised right hand stood for the power in Black America. Carlos’ left hand stood for the unity of Black America. Together, they formed an arc of unity and power. The black scarf around my neck stood for Black pride. The black socks with no shoes stood for black poverty in racist America. The totality of our effort was the beginning of Black dignity (Anderberg, 2004, 13:17; Olympic Project for Human Rights, p. 1).
It was one of the 20th century’s most powerful and controversial moments in sport and a watershed event in the civil rights movement. Determined to use the grand stage of the Olympic Games as a platform for protest, Smith and Carlos accepted their 200 meters track & field gold and bronze medals in bare feet (to bring attention to the poverty of the African-American community) wearing beads (in honor of the countless blacks murdered as victims of slavery or racism) and holding black-gloved fists in the air (the “Black Power” salute).
A storm of outrage hit Smith and Carlos immediately. The International Olympic Committee forced the U.S. Olympic Committee to withdraw them from the relays, banish them from the Olympic Village and expel them from the U.S. Olympic team. Both men experienced heavy backlash upon their return home.
Amid worldwide publicity about the events of the 1968 Olympic Games, several items went unreported. First, the origins of and background to the Smith-Carlos behavior were not publicized. Second, the man who finished second to Tommy Smith, Australian Peter Norman, wore the badge of the Olympic Committee for Human Rights throughout the ceremony.
The Intersection of Race, Ethnicity and Sport in the Promotion of Human Rights - A Cultural Protest
Many ethnic, racial, political and human rights examples represent the symbolic power of sport and serve as good indicators of the interconnection and intersection between race, sport and human rights from both an international and national stance (Eitzen & Sage, 1997). The examples that follow exemplify the failure of the politics of race and sport to promote human rights from an international perspective (Corbett, 1999, pp.169-170; Eitzen & Sage, 1997, pp. 181,187):
  • The boot camp that the Springbok (South African National Rugby Union) squad was put through preparing for the 2003 World Cup by Coach Rudolf Straeuli was a national scandal and made the rest of the rugby world roll its collective eyes. Pictures of naked players carrying railway tracks and tractor tires and huddling in a freezing dam were all part of Straeuli's campaign to toughen his players up. Other highlights included fitness instructors smashing eggs on players' heads. Springbok manager Gideon Sam reckoned the exercise was "mild" compared to what many African people put up with every day. "The players looked like prisoners of war. I have no problem with it," he added. Needless to say, Straeuli was gone straight after the Cup, in which the Springboks lost in the quarter-finals to the All Blacks (New Zealand National Rugby Union team).
  • With the Olympic Games being held in Germany in 1936, the United States dropped two Jewish sprinters from the 400-meter relay.
  • In 1948, Israel was excluded from Olympic Games participation because the Arab nations threatened a boycott.
  • In 1956, Egypt, Lebanon and Iraq boycotted the Olympic Games because of the Anglo-French seizure of the Suez Canal.
  • Switzerland and the Netherlands withdrew from the Olympic Games in protest after the Soviet Union invaded Hungary.
  • In 1964, South Africa was prevented from participating in the Olympic Games because of its apartheid policies.
  • The Black African nations’ 1976 boycott of the summer Olympic Games occurred because the International Olympic Committee (IOC) failed to ban New Zealand from permitting its rugby team to play in segregated South Africa and The IOC allowed New Zealand to participate in the Games. Twenty-eight African nations boycotted the ‘76 Games.
  • The international protest against South Africa grew and kept South Africa out of the 1968 Olympic Games, setting the stage for South Africa to face complete isolation in international sport.
  • In 1980, President Carter called for the United States to ban the Moscow Olympic Games because the U.S.S.R. invaded Afghanistan. In total, some fifty-four nations, participated in the boycott including West Germany, Canada and Japan.
  • In 1991, The International Olympic Committee agreed to allow South Africa to participate in the 1992 Olympic Games, if South Africa met certain conditions regarding the disassembling of apartheid (Eitzen & Sage, 1997, p. 187).
  • 1992 saw the return of South Africa to the Olympic Games after an absence of 32 years caused by its system of apartheid in sport. With the fall of apartheid and the election of Nelson Mandela as the country’s President, the sports world accepted South Africa. In 1995, South Africa was allowed to host the World Cup in Rugby.
Not unlike the international scene, there are numerous examples from United States sport of how the politics of race and sport have not functioned to promote the human rights of African-Americans. A few cases in point are the following (Corbett, 1999, p. 170):
  • In the 1990's, country clubs throughout the United States that maintained exclusive memberships where challenged to accept minorities. The Birmingham’s Shoal Creek Country Club agreed to admit minorities under the threat of having golf’s Professional Golf Association (PGA) championship withdrawn from the site.
  • In 1993, the Annandale Golf Club in Pasadena, California was scheduled to host the U.S. Women’s Amateur golf tournament, but withdrew it’s name in order to avoid bringing attention to the fact the Club had no minority members.
  • The National Football League (NFL) decided to rescind the decision to hold the 1993 Super Bowl in Phoenix, Arizona after the voters of Arizona rejected a paid legal holiday to honor Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. for his good human rights works.
No one can examine past social, political, economic history and the present plight of African-Americans in sport and in society and intelligently deny that the record is far from perfect. The fundamental importance of human rights and human dignity cannot be overrated. Sport can legitimately play a powerful role in positively advancing the human rights of people in ways that reach far beyond the sporting arena.

References
Anderberg, K. (2004, August 28). More raised black fists at Olympics ceremonies. Retrieved August 28, 2004, from http://www.portland.indymedia.org/ en/2004/08/295721.shtml
Avlon, J.P. (2005, September 23). Lyndon Baines Bush. Retrieved September 27, 2005, from http://www.nysun.com/article/20499
Corbett, D.R. (1999). Ethics and moral behavior in sport: A human rights issue. How You Play the Game Conference Proceedings: The First International Conference on sports and Human Rights. Sydney, Australia.
Cassidy, R. (2005, February 6). Ten-count for Max Schmeling and Coley Wallace. The Sweet Science.com. Retrieved August 28, 2006 from http://www.theseweetscience.com/boxing-article/662/ ten-count-max-schmeling-coley-wall
Clark, K. (2005, September 09). Republicans: In their own words. WhitePrivilege.com. Retrieved August 11, 2006, from http://www.whiteprivilege.com.
Daley, WR (2006, February 9). Public health response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR. 55(2), 29-30
Doise, W. (2003, December 1). Human rights as social representations. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Eitzen, D.S., & Sage, G.H. (1997). Sociology of North American sport. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
Gentry, P. (2005, September 30). Remarks on Blacks, crime. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.bet.com
Giroux, H.A. (2006). Reading Hurricane Katrina: Race, class, and the biopolitics of disposal college literature .Retrieved August 19, 2006, from http://muse. jhu.edu/cgi-bin/access.cgi?uri=/journals/college_literature/ v033/33.3giroux.pdf
Harris, O., & Curry, T. (1997). The role of sport in the Black community. The cultural significance of Jackie Robinson. 30, (4), 311-319.
Hoberman, J. (1997). Darwin’s athletes: How sport has damaged Black America and preserved the myth of race.
Ignatieff, M. (2005, September 25). The broken contract. The New York Times.com
Jones, J.M. (Winter, 1998). Psychological knowledge and the new American dilemma of race. Journal of Social Issues, 54( 4), 641-662.
Olympic Project for Human Rights (2000, May 2). Olympic Project for Human Rights. Retrieved August 15, 2006 from http://everything2.com/index.pl? node_id=527620.
Sage, G. H. (1998). Power and ideology in American sport: A critical perspective. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
The New York Times. (2005, September 7). Barbara Bush calls evacuees better off, A22.


Contact
Dr. Doris R.Corbett,
Department of Health, Human Performance and Leisure Studies
Howard University, Washington
USA
dcorbett@howard.edu



Profile - "Out in Sport" at the
GLISA Human Rights Conference
July 26-29, 2006
Rob Jagnow

At the beginning of August, more than 12,000 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) athletes from 109 countries descended on Montreal for the First World Outgames. The week-long event, organized by the Gay & Lesbian International Sport Association (GLISA) emphasized participation, inclusion and personal best at its 36 sporting events.
From July 26-29, 2006, just prior to the opening of the Outgames, GLISA also hosted the world's largest human rights conference on LGBT issues with more than 2000 participants of its own. As part of the event, the Gay & Lesbian Athletics Foundation (GLAF) put together an "Out in Sport" conference track with ten panel presentations on topics ranging from transgender athletes to unique concerns for the LGBT sports movement in developing countries.
The inclusion of the "Out in Sport" conference track is motivated by the understanding that sport can be a powerful agent of social change. Just as Jackie Robinson paved the road for social change by being the first African American player in major league baseball, LGBT persons today have the opportunity to change attitudes and breakdown stereotypes through participation in sport.
Remarkably, despite these barriers, the First World Outgames included representatives from 20 countries where homosexuality is still a crime. Enormous progress has been seen in countries like Mexico and Brazil, where LGBT sports leagues are rapidly growing and receiving positive attention from mainstream media.
The "Out in Sport" conference is not just about surveying the status quo but also about identifying means to move forward in the fight against homophobia. One panel focused explicitly on effective agents of social change, identifying the following as key success factors:
  • Pick a targeted mission and do it exceptionally well.
  • Make sure there is a means for financial stability.
  • Demonstrate a need for change.
  • Draw attention to tolerance that already exists.
  • Exercise individual honesty and integrity.
  • Seek a common ground for debate around safety, respect and rights.
  • Aim to understand the struggles of other minority groups.
As an appropriate segue from the human rights conference into the Outgames, tennis champion Martina Navratilova gave a keynote address at the closing plenary session. In her own take on effective agents of social change, she emphasized honesty and integrity, saying that the most powerful statement one can make is to come out of the closet to friends, family and coworkers. It is much harder to have intolerance toward a group if one has a personal, rather than abstract, connection to that group. Furthermore, she emphasized that as consumers, we speak with our dollars and we should be deliberate about supporting businesses that support the LGBT community.
Also introduced at the closing plenary session was the Declaration of Montreal, a document that lays out the political agenda of the LGBT community. Mirroring the major conference themes, the declaration is organized into the categories of essential rights, global issues, the diverse LGBT community, participation in society and creating social change. The document is intended to serve as a foundation for the LGBT equality movement and will likely be used as a benchmark for decades to come.


Contact
Dr. Rob Jagnow
Gay and Lesbian Athletics Federation
USA
Rjagnow@alum.mit.edu



Quote - Cheri Blauwet
 

"To overcome conflict and misunderstanding, we need communication. To communicate, we need a common language. Sport, more than any other medium, provides a language through which any group from any culture can find a common ground. It lights that spark within us all – the thrill of competition, the camaraderie of a team, the nostalgia of the game in years past. It reminds of what it is to be human, and to simply – love life.
In addition, sport also empowers the individual. Billy Jean King once said that "pressure is a privilege." Indeed, to rise up to the identity of athlete, and to feel pressure, drive, and competitive edge, empowers us to see ourselves as people who can achieve and who have the opportunity to define our own path through this life. This is especially true for people with a disability, who are still often defined by their physical impairment. Sports turns this notion on it's head and makes the individual, and those around him or her, understand that ability lies in how you view yourself and how you choose to move forward in the world. "

Cheri Blauwet
Medical Student, Stanford University
Paralympic Gold Medalist, Two-time winner of the Boston Marathon



Profile - Sport and Adapted Physical Activity: Advocates of Rights and Dignity for All
Claudine Sherrill & Yeshayahu Hutzler

 

Since its founding by French-speaking leaders from Canada and Belgium in 1972, the International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (IFAPA) has perceived itself as a strong advocate for sport for persons of all ages with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity (APA), which includes sport, physical education, rehabilitation and recreation, has developed into a profession, a service delivery system and a rapidly growing body of cross-disciplinary knowledge. Today, regional organizations function in Asia, Europe, and the USA and are developing in Oceania, South America and Africa, all of which have elected representatives on the IFAPA Board. Many countries also have national organizations modeled after IFAPA (e.g. Brazil, Austria, Thailand). IFAPA is a little known resource to many professionals. It is hoped that this article will encourage interest in joint research projects with other ICSSPE organizations and with various sport organizations.

IFAPA Definition of Adaptive Physical Activity (APA)
Definitions are socially constructed, meaning they change over time as beliefs and attitudes change. Different definitions of APA have thus co-existed since the 1950s. Following is the definition currently most often used in international circles.
According to the By-Laws of the International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (IFAPA), a member of ICSSPE,
“Adapted physical activity is a cross disciplinary body of knowledge directed toward the identification and solution of individual differences in physical activity. It is a service-delivery profession and academic field of study that supports an attitude of acceptance of individual differences, advocates access to active lifestyles and sport, and promotes innovation and cooperative service delivery programs and empowerment systems. Adapted physical activity includes, but is not limited to, physical education, sport, recreation, dance and creative arts, nutrition, medicine, and rehabilitation” (IFAPA, 2004).

The IFAPA definition includes several key words, including some that are not well understood by many (Hutzler & Sherrill, in press). Cross disciplinary refers to the body of scientific and practical APA knowledge that applies scholarship in such areas as lifespan physical activity, human rights and dignity and sport sciences to disability, person-environment differences and contextual variables (i.e. the WHO/ICF components) without regard for traditional disciplinary boundaries. Service delivery (or provision of supports) is the broad term for the job functions generalist and specialist professionals perform in inclusive, partially inclusive and separate physical activity settings in schools, communities and rehabilitation centers. Job functions requiring adaptation or change competencies to meet the needs and interests of all include planning (program or individual); assessment; participation, preparation and paper work related to meetings; teaching, coaching, counseling and training; evaluation (both formulative and cumulative); consulting; and advocacy. Advocacy, once associated only with law, broadly means action directed toward changing beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviors in relation to such causes as accessibility, inclusion and empowerment. APA’s unique contributions to quality of life are guiding by its goal of combining everything there is to know about disability, physical activity and variables that interact with each.
Empowerment, reflecting the relatively new trend toward self-determination, choice and self-regulation as APA goals (Reid, 2003) is emphasized in the IFAPA definition along with service delivery. Empowerment is generally defined as a process through which individuals gain control over their lives, a sense of power equitable with others and a feeling of responsibility for self, others and the environment (Sherrill, 2004). In particular, empowerment refers to participating in the governance of any organization pertaining to disability, as captured in the motto “Nothing about us without us” (Charlton, 1998). Rehabilitative sports in medical settings and their outreach programs have long been recognized as influential in empowerment (Daniels, 1954; Guttmann, 1976; Hutzler, 1990; Stafford, 1939). According to Hutzler (1990, p. 49), “The ideology of empowerment can be implemented in different settings of disabled sports, either therapeutic, education, recreational, or competitive.” Inclusion of the word empowerment in the IFAPA definition is thus extremely important.

Omissions in the IFAPA Definition of APA
The IFAPA definition also has omissions. Because it is one of the major pillars on which the profession is founded, concern has been expressed that the concept of lifetime or lifespan does not appear. This concern is especially important in countries that embrace APA personnel preparation for and employment with all age groups in the diverse areas of rehabilitation, recreation, sports and physical education (DePotter et al., 2003).
Second, the IFAPA definition should perhaps also indicate that APA is an umbrella term for job functions of professionals in different settings (e.g. mainstream or inclusive, partially inclusive and separate). Third, some persons believe that failure to define and include relevant examples of adaptation in sport and movement environments is a grave omission (Hutzler & Sherrill, in press). Today adaptation is generally considered to be change strategies directed toward specific variables or interacting variables in the sport or movement environment to enable goal achievement as well as a good feeling about total-self-in-activity. Contrary to old-time thinking, adaptation is not meant to change the entire nature of an established sport but rather to change one or two variables, as needed.

APA Beliefs Concerning Disability
Adapted Physical Activity (APA) or Adapted Physical Education (APE), as a profession, believes all persons with disability, regardless of severity of condition, should be provided sport, dance and aquatics experiences throughout their lifespan. These experiences, when appropriate, should be the same as those of others in the mainstream. When, however, a person (with or without a labeled disability) needs help in achieving performance or participation goals, then adaptation (change strategy) is applied to one or more of the variables that may act as barriers to success (e.g. rules, method of instruction, equipment, facilities, size of participating group).
Traditionally, APA has been associated with disability (or individual differences in the psychomotor domain), but this set of beliefs may unconsciously support the
outdated assumption that disability comes from or is in the individual. Today, APA service providers are changing their old mindsets to believe that disability is a dynamic combination (or flow) of person-environment interactions that interfere with performance and participation. In this contemporary definition, environment encompasses all variables interacting with persons of different sizes, shapes and capacities (e.g. social, psychological, ecological, physical, architectural) in various contexts (e.g. home, school, community and subcomponents of each). APA, and its school-based component adapted physical education (APE), thus strive to change the ways physical educators and ordinary people think about disability. Fundamental to this goal is acceptance that at least two approaches to defining disability comprise contemporary philosophy.
  1. Disability, the term preferred in most sport organizations, should reflect the language of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF, 2001) of the World Health Organization (WHO).
  2. Disability, real or perceived, is experienced by everyone at one time or another, in regard to personal appearance, goal achievement, and/or expectations of others. Disability is multidimensional and dynamic, a combination of human and environmental forces changing on a day-by-day basis.
The first approach comes from the international medical community and is primarily for use in diagnosis, classification, treatment and insurance. The second approach is prominent among persons who dislike labels and subscribe to humanism (i.e. we are all human, we all fail, we all strive for personal bests and we all need one another). Now that the WHO conceptualizes disability as a conglomerate of person-environment interactions affecting function, the two approaches can be held concurrently. Practice, however, often lags behind theory, position statements of experts and research evidence.

References
Daniels, A. (1954). Adapted physical education. New York: Harper & Row.
DePotter, J.C., Van Coppenolle, H., Djobova, S., Dobreva, I., Wijns, K., & Van Peteghem, A. (Eds.). (2003). Vocational training in adapted physical activity. Leuven, Belgium: Thematic European Network on Adapted Physical Activity (THENAPA).
Guttmann, L. (1976). Textbook of sport for the handicapped. Aylesbury, England: HM & M.
Hutzler, Y. (1990). The concept of empowerment in rehabilitative sports. In G. Doll- Tepper, C. Dahms, B. Doll, & H.v.Selzam (Eds.). Adapted physical activity: An interdisciplinary approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Hutzler, Y., & Sherrill, C. (in press). Defining adapted physical activity: International perspectives. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly.

Contact
Dr. Claudine Sherrill
International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (IFAPA)
USA
Csherrill1@earthlink.net

Dr. Yeshayahu Hutzler
International Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (IFAPA)
Israel
Shayke@wincol.ac.il


The Development of the Human Rights of Individuals with Disabilities in Sport at the United Nations and Beyond
Elise C. Roy

 

Abstract
Although the human right for people with disabilities to participate in sport or physical activity is not a newly recognized right at the United Nations, it has been just recently that the momentum to guaranteeing this right across the world has begun. The following paper will examine both the drafting of the Disability Convention and the International Year of Sport and Physical Education’s contribution to the human rights movement in sport. It will also discuss the founding of the International Disability in Sport Working Group and provide a list of challenges that the working group foresees for the future.

Introduction
The movement towards recognizing and capitalizing on the human rights involved in sport 1, especially for people with disabilities, has only recently begun to gain momentum 2. This newfound impetus, however, is not because the human right to participate in sport and physical activity is a new right recognized by the United Nations or other regional bodies; in reality the human right to participate in sport and physical activity has been accepted at the international level for almost 30 years. As early as 1978, UNESCO drafted the International Charter on Physical Education and Sport, which explicitly states that “The practice of physical education and sport is a fundamental human right for all.” 3 The Charter emphasizes that every person is entitled to participate in sport, including women, children and youth, the elderly and those with disabilities. 4
Besides UNESCO’s Charter, two other international instruments contain provisions that protect the human right to participate in sport and physical activity. However, unlike UNESCO, the documents focus specifically on disability and not on sport. In 1982 the United Nations created the World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons 5 and in 1993 they created The Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. 6 Both instruments contained Articles that recognized people with disabilities’ right to sport. 7
However, the true catalyst for this recent acknowledgement by societies across the world of the role of sport in development, especially in the context of people with disabilities, has come from two key actions taken by the United Nations: (1) establishing an ad hoc committee in 2001 to create a legally binding Convention to protect the rights and dignity of people with disabilities and (2) declaring 2005 as the International Year of Sport and Physical Education.
The following paper will examine the importance of sport in human development for people with disabilities framed by the Convention process and UN Year of Sport and Physical Education. It will also discuss the formation of an International Disability in Sport Working Group and the future challenges in developing people with disabilities in sport.

The Implications of Sport for the Human Development in the Context of People with Disabilities
The ability to participate in sport is not only a human right, but it also serves as an enabler of other human rights. If we take the example of individuals with disabilities in refugee camps, why should the United Nations care about providing newly disabled refugees with sports programs when they are having trouble merely providing them with basic food, water and medical supplies?
Newly displaced refugees are often individuals who have just lost their job, their homes, have seen family members shot in front of their own eyes, are newly disabled or are suffering from the trauma of war. Many times those that are newly disabled feel as if their lives are simply over because of the negative stereotypes toward people with disabilities found in their cultures. However, when these individuals are placed in a sports realm, their mindset changes from one of disability to that of ability. 8 The focus is on their ability to score a goal or block a shot; not on the fact that their bodies differ from “normal” standards set by society. 9 They start seeing that their body, although it functions in a different way, is still capable of doing things they never thought it would be capable of doing.
Sport also changes the perceptions of those observing. The onlookers begin to see these individuals with disabilities doing things they would never have imagined them able to do. Each time their initial belief about those with disabilities is proven wrong, they become more inclined to believe that these people with disabilities are capable of accomplishing more. It also effectively tackles social exclusion. In Cambodia, Handicap International conducted a three-day camp placing people with disabilities with people without disabilities. 10 After the three days, they found that exposure to people with disabilities that the camp fostered, had positively influenced and improved the perceptions of disability in the children participating. 11
Sport also teaches social skills to individuals with disabilities. It teaches cooperation, respect, self-esteem and leadership. 12 The value of learning these skills is especially important for people with disabilities because they are frequently excluded from the educational system and other arenas where their non-disabled peers receive these skills.
The United Nations has also recognized that sport is low cost. A soccer ball can be made from scraps and a goal made from throwing two shirts down on the ground. Sport is also universal – it is found in even the most desolate places on earth. As a result, it is a universal language, understood by all, despite native language barriers. 13
The health benefits of sport are similarly immense. Not only does it lead to a healthy lifestyle but it also serves as an inexpensive means of physical and psychological rehabilitation. Additionally, it is an excellent platform to educate about health issues such as HIV/AIDS. 14 This is because it is a safe environment, where athletes trust and respect their coaches. 15 It is also an environment where the individuals are taught respect for the body. 16 Further, it brings large groups of people from a community together in a fun way, increasing the number of people these important messages will reach. 17
Sport also contributes to sustainable economic development. 18 It creates jobs for coaches, for those involved in making sport equipment and for industry service providers. It serves as a platform to teach entrepreneurial business skills, such as strategy, teamwork and planning. It also is a realm for potential employees to gain the skills necessary to become successful workers.
Finally, since the sport arena has incredible social networks through volunteerism and support via community leaders and teachers – more than any other human activity, including religion – the possibilities for influence on decision makers is endless and can be a strong catalyst for social mobilization.

The Disability Convention
The true change in perceptions that started to legitimize human rights for people with disabilities in sport began with the resolution of the UN General Assembly on the 19th of December in 2001, to establish an Ad Hoc Committee "to consider proposals for a comprehensive and integral international Convention [i.e. treaty] to promote and protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities.” 19 After advocates convened several times a year, for five years, on August 25th 2006, a U. General Assembly panel approved the draft text. The text is expected to be approved during the 61st session of the 192 nation General Assembly, which began in September 2006.
The sport and physical activity text is as follows:
With a view to enabling persons with disabilities to participate on an equal basis with others in recreational, leisure and sporting activities, States Parties shall take appropriate measures:
  1. To encourage and promote the participation, to the fullest extent possible, of persons with disabilities in mainstream sporting activities at all levels;
  2. To ensure that persons with disabilities have an opportunity to organize, develop and participate in disability-specific sporting and recreational activities, and to this end, encourage the provision, on an equal basis with others, of appropriate instruction, training and resources;
  3. To ensure that persons with disabilities have access to sporting and recreational and tourism venues;
  4. To ensure that children with disabilities have equal access to participation in play, recreation, and leisure and sporting activities, including those activities in the school system;
  5. To ensure that persons with disabilities have access to services from those involved in the organization of recreational, tourism, leisure and sporting activities.
The proposed Convention differed from all other documents previously created by the United Nations focusing on disability because those were not considered “legally binding.” This means “that the parties [to the past documents did] not intend to create binding obligations but merely want to declare certain aspirations.” 20 This movement towards the creation of a legally binding instrument specifically protecting the human rights of people with disabilities would produce not only an instrument that could be enforced, but also serve as a catalyst for a renewed rights movement across the world.
The need for this Convention was aptly pointed out by Mary Lou Breslin and Sylvia Yee, two scholars in the field of international disability rights, who note that the existing state of international law addressing disability rights is that of a “toothless tiger.” 21 They state that a new treaty would,

“Legitimize claims for additional attention and resources from the human rights division of the United Nations, governments, and other organizations; …[it] would provide an opportunity to both add specific content to the human rights of persons with disabilities and address hitherto unexplored areas… [it] would give disability rights organizations a specific tool for promoting human rights for persons with disabilities in domestic contexts and to their own governments … [and it] would be a catalyst for empowering and mobilizing the global disability rights movement.” 22
Since the Convention’s inception, an article on the right to participate in sport was introduced in draft texts.23 However, despite these positive contributions, disability in sport advocates at the United Nations continued to battle a population that was largely ignorant about people with disabilities in sport. Many of those at the United Nations typically belonged to an older generation that did not have a high percentage of participants in sport. This made it difficult for the right to be recognized, respected and accepted. In the beginning, disability advocates stood up in caucus 24 meetings questioning whether sport was even a human right. As a result, disability in sport advocates started moving away from the use of the term “sport” and towards “physical activity” because this was a more widely accepted term and focused on the more concrete benefits of sport as opposed to merely elite sports. The advocates began ingraining in the minds of advocates that sport is not a luxury, but at the most basic level a human right and that it is essential for all individuals to lead healthy, fulfilling lives.
The advocates also embarked on an educational campaign in order to outfit state parties with the necessary knowledge and tools to create an effective Article. In June of 2004, they held a briefing at the United Nations, inviting speakers from all over the world to address an audience of over 80 State Delegates and non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) on the issues involved in people with disabilities in sport. One of the biggest misunderstandings between state delegates was the different settings in which individuals with disabilities participate in sport.
The first setting is one in which an athlete with a disability competes with athletes without disabilities, known as participating in “mainstream activities.” An example of this is a deaf athlete competing in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) soccer with athletes who are not deaf. In this realm, the athlete faces discrimination comparable to women and ethnic/racial minorities. An athlete often experiences unfounded discrimination about his or her playing capabilities. Coaches may start with low expectations for the individual with a disability, making the athlete have to raise the bar that much higher than his peers without disabilities. Or the athlete with a disability might not even be given the chance to participate – a physical education teacher may fail to see ways to adapt the sports to include them or just assume that they are unable to participate. Individuals with disabilities may also not receive the necessary accommodations for their disability. For example, a deaf athlete participating with hearing peers, needs a sign language interpreter to ensure that he or she can benefit from coaching at a comparable level as other athletes.
The second realm is known as “disability-specific sport.” In this realm, individuals with disabilities participate with other individuals with comparable disabilities. Due to diverse mobility capabilities, full integration into mainstream sports and recreation activities is not possible for a large percentage of the disability population. For example, consider the safety risks involved if able-bodied athletes compete with persons in wheelchairs in contact sports. 25 Thus, disability-specific programming is important for realizing equal opportunity in sport. Many of these sports are adapted forms of mainstream sports such as sled hockey where individuals with lower limb impairments use sleds as skates. In this realm, individuals with disabilities often experience discrimination in the form of not having access to coaches that are trained in adapting sport to fit the needs of those competing with disabilities, or not being able to access the local gym or recreation fields because they are not outfitted with wheelchair ramps or other necessary accommodations. Thus, athletes in disability specific sport require different resources than their mainstream counterparts.
In one of the initial drafts of the policy, it included a provision that stated, “ensure that persons with disabilities have an opportunity to organise and participate in sporting activities and to receive the same [emphasis provided] instruction, training and resources in support that is available to other participants.” 26 Although the intent here was benevolent, the potential policy implications were to give a group of individuals who could not move without wheelchairs access to gyms with steps or to coaches who had no idea how to train athletes with disabilities in games such as wheelchair rugby. Further, it would not have required equipment, games and resources to be adapted to the needs of the athletes with disabilities in order to actively participate in sports. Instead, disability in sport advocates successfully urged the replacement of “same” with “appropriate”, reflecting the fact that individuals with disabilities often need different resources, etc. As a result of the different protections needed in these different settings, a subclause was drafted for each disability-specific sport and mainstream sport. 27
Another problem encountered in the initial language was that “participation” was not defined. As a result, it could be interpreted to mean merely serving as a scorekeeper. In the final draft text participation has been qualified by stating, “To encourage and promote the participation, to the fullest extent possible” [emphasis provided].
At the beginning of the Convention, the article on sport and physical activity did not contain specific mention of vulnerable populations in sport – i.e. women with disabilities, children and refugees. 28 Disability in sport advocates were successful in obtaining special protection for children’s right to play as well as their right to actively participate in physical education. The advocates were also successful in obtaining special protection for women in the sporting realm even though the Article on sport does not specifically address gender. The Convention includes this special protection for women in Article 6, which prevents discrimination on the basis of sex, throughout all articles of the Convention. Advocates lobbied for the use of the word “gender” instead of “sex” because it protected a broader group of people i.e. transgender or intersex athletes. However, during the final meeting, “gender” was replaced with “sex.” Although disability in sport advocates were able to convince some countries to take up the issue of refugees,29 they were unsuccessful in getting it included in the final draft text.
These meetings served as an important impetus to expand recognition of the human development potential that sport brings for people with disabilities because not only does it serve as a potential vehicle to bind governments legally to their obligations in the realm of people with disabilities in sport but it also brought leaders from all over the world together to work on the Convention. After the meetings, these leaders go back to their native countries to continue the momentum of the Convention in their homelands.

2005: The International Year of Sport and Physical Education
The second catalyst that has brought the human rights embodied in sport to the global consciousness was a decision in November of 2003 by the United Nations to declare 2005 as the International Year of Sport and Physical Education. 30 The United Nations acknowledged that despite past UN documents delineating the developmental benefits of sport, the world was far behind in using it to help achieve human development to the fullest potential. 31 They also noted “that sport and physical education in many countries face increasing marginalization within educational systems.” 32 They hoped that the year would increase sports role in promoting education, health, development and peace. 33
The reaction from the year of sport was immensely successful. “70 countries identified multi-stakeholder national committees or national focal points to plan, coordinate and implement national observance of the Year, thousands of local projects were initiated. Also during this time over 20 international conferences and 18 regional conferences were held within the context of the International Year of Sport and Physical Education and thousands of other initiatives strengthened the role of sport and physical education as an integral dimension of the development and cooperation strategies of all stakeholders including sports organizations, athletes, multilateral organizations and the United Nations system, bilateral development agencies, Governments across all sectors, the armed forces, non-governmental organizations, the private sector and sports industry, research institutions and the media.” 34 According to the Special Rappeteurs final report, the “International Year contributed to a better understanding of the value of sport and physical education for human development and a more systematic use of sport in development programmes.” 35
However, largely absent from the International Year of Sport and Physical Education’s agenda were conferences, educational initiatives and programs that specifically focused on disability, even though there were many focusing on sport and gender.36

Formation of a Working Group
As the meetings drew to a close, disability in sport advocates began formulating an International Disability in Sport Working Group. Not only was there an absence in the UN Sport office focusing on disability but the policy that the advocates had been working on for so long was only as effective as the programs, research and momentum that grew out of it.
The mission of the International Disability in Sport Working Group is to advance and protect people with disabilities’ human rights as they relate to sport. 37 The working groups goals are:
  1. To promote the advancement of human rights for people with disabilities as they relate to sport.
  2. To monitor the status of people with a disabilities’ right to sport in all regions of the world.
  3. To develop and support research that enhances people with disabilities' human rights to sport.
  4. To develop and support sport and physical activity programmes for people with disabilities. 38
The working group has successfully secured support from UN Year of Sport and Physical Education, UNICEF, the International Women in Sport Working Group (a parallel working group that focuses on women), Special Olympics International, the Deaflympics, the International Paralympic Committee and from top international organizations involved in disability in sport development such as Rehabilitation International, Disabled People International (DPI) and Landmine Survivors Network.
Following in the footsteps of the Convention, the working group must ensure that the momentum created by the UN Year of Sport and Physical Education as well as the Convention is not lost. Every possible media outlet should be utilized to spread information about the Convention and people with disabilities in sport. Campaigns to get countries to ratify the treaty must be undertaken, because if a country does not sign the Convention, the Convention cannot protect that country’s disabled population. Another challenge is educating a largely uneducated world about people with disabilities in sport, and in the process, using sport to adapt communities’ minds about people with disabilities. It will be important also to continually monitor access to sport and physical activity for people with disabilities across the globe to ensure that these rights are given. We must also fill the gap in research related to disability in sport and the human rights associated with it. Hard academic research must be done in the field in order to provide evidence of the benefits of people with disabilities participating in sport, along with their socio-economic development. Finally, it will be important to ensure that governments and other organizations involved in sport interpret the Convention to the greatest benefit of people with disabilities (i.e. the fact that discrimination on the basis of sex is prohibited in realm of people with disabilities in sport).



1 The term “sport” throughout this paper will refer to all levels of physical activity – sport, recreation, play and leisure.
2 Final Report: International Year of Sport and Physical Education 2005, Para 98, page 20.
3 Article I, UNESCO International Charter on Physical Education and Sport.
http://www.unesco.org/education/information/nfsunesco/pdf/
SPORT_E.PDF#search=%221978%20UNESCO%20charter%20
on%20sports%20and%20physical%20education%22

(last accessed August 17, 2006).
4 Id. at 1.3.
5 See http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dissre00.htm (last accessed August 17, 2006).
6 See http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dissre00.htm (last accessed August 17, 2006).
7 The World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons states, “The importance of sports for disabled persons is becoming increasingly recognized. Member States should therefore encourage all forms of sports activities of disabled persons, inter alia, through the provision of adequate facilities and the proper organization of these activities.” The Standard Rules state in Rule 11, “States will take measures to ensure that persons with disabilities have equal opportunities for recreation and sports.
  • States should initiate measures to make places for recreation and sports, hotels, beaches, sports arenas, gym halls, etc., accessible to persons with disabilities. Such measures should encompass support for staff in recreation and sports programmes, including projects to develop methods of accessibility, and participation, information and training programmes.
  • Tourist authorities, travel agencies, hotels, voluntary organizations and others involved in organizing recreational activities or travel opportunities should offer their services to all, taking into account the special needs of persons with disabilities. Suitable training should be provided to assist that process.
  • Sports organizations should be encouraged to develop opportunities for participation by persons with disabilities in sports activities. In some cases, accessibility measures could be enough to open up opportunities for participation. In other cases, special arrangements or special games would be needed. States should support the participation of persons with disabilities in national and international events.
  • Persons with disabilities participating in sports activities should have access to instruction and training of the same quality as other participants.
  • Organizers of sports and recreation should consult with organizations of persons with disabilities when developing their services for persons with disabilities.”
8 Karen DePauw and Susan Gavron, “Disability and Sport”, Human Kinetics, at 10 (1995).
9 Elise Roy, “Using Sport as a Muscle for Integration: The Legal Rights of Athletes with Disabilities to Participate in Recreational and Sporting Opportunities.” (not published, 2003).
10 Jenny Ikelberg, et al. Fun Inclusive!
http://www.handicap-international.org.uk/pdfs/Fun_Inclusive_Sport_and_Disability.pdf (Last accessed August 29, 2006).
11 Id.
12 Sport for Development and Peace: Towards Achieving the UN Millennium Goals, United Nations, at V(2003).
13 Id. at 17.
14 HIV/AIDS awareness campaigns for people with disabilities are even more vital as “literacy rates for disabled individuals are exceptionally low, thus making communication of messages about HIV/AIDS all the more difficult.” (HIV/AIDS and People With Disability, The Lancet, vol. 361, April 26, 2003, p. 1401-1402.) In addition, individuals with disabilities are frequently overlooked in HIV/AIDS awareness campaigns because they are often not viewed as sexual individuals or drug users. However in reality,
“those with [a] disability - and disabled women in particular- are likely to have more sexual partners than their non-disabled peers. Extreme poverty and social sanctions against marrying a disabled person mean that they are likely to become involved in a series of unstable relationships. Disabled individuals (both male and female) around the world are more likely to be victims of sexual abuse and rape than their non-disabled peers.”
Id.
15 Id. at 22.
16 Id.
17 Id.
18 Id. at 11.
19 See Resolution 56/168 http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/disA56168e1.htm (last accessed August 17, 2006).
20 See http://untreaty.un.org/English/guide.txt (last accessed August 17, 2006).
21 Mary Lou Breslin and Silvia Yee, “Disability Rights and Policy: International and National Perspectives,” Transnational Publishers, at 18 (2002).
22 Id.
23 See Working Paper Submitted by Mexico, Article 16: “States Parties shall ensure that persons with disabilities have access to and the enjoyment of:
  1. Recreational, cultural, and sports activities through adaptations which facilitate them the use of related facilities and services.
  2. Their integration into routine sports activities and national as well as international competitions.
  3. A system of scholarships or special incentives for cultural, artistic, and sports activities.”
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/adhocmeetaac265w1e.htm, A/AC.265/WP.1 (last accessed August 29, 2006).
24 For the first time ever in an international treaty drafting process non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) were able to actively participate in discussions regarding the draft text. The forum created for the NGO voice was an International Disability Caucus (IDC), which appointed representatives to voice the collective NGO stand.
25 Elise Roy, “January 2004 Draft Working Group Disability Convention Text Critique” (distributed only at the United Nations) (March 2004).
26 See http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahcwgreporta24.htm (Last accessed August 29, 2006).
27 Please refer to page, 6 for the full text of these subclauses.
28 See http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahcwgreportax1.htm (Last accessed August 29, 2006).
29 See Report of the Third Session of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of People with Disabilities, A/AC.265/2004/5, (June, 9 2004).
30 A/RES/58/5, “Sport as a means to promote education, health, development and peace.”
31 Id.
32 Id.
33 Id.
34 Final Report International Year of Sport and Physical Education.
http://www.un.org/sport2005/a_year/IYSPE_Report_FINAL.pdf at 2, (2005)
35 Id.
36 The Year of Sport did hold a conference on Rehabilitation Through Physical Activity and Sport that addressed adapted sport and also focused on the psychological effects of the Southeast Asia tsunami. The Year of Sport also formed partnerships with the International Paralympic Committee and Special Olympics as well as had a small section on their website devoted to sport and disability. However, there were no tangible results felt as in the gender realm.
37 International Disability in Sport Working Group Goals and Objectives, internal memorandum (January 2006).
38 Id.


Contact
Elise Roy, JD
Center for the Study of Sport in Society
USA
Eliser77@gmail.com


Profile - Promoting Human Rights
Through Paralympic Sport

The International Paralympic Committee (IPC) is committed to supporting and promoting human rights for all current and potential Paralympic athletes. In 2004, the IPC Governing Board approved a Position Statement stressing equal access and opportunities and hosted an International Symposium on Human Rights on the occasion of the Athens 2004 Paralympic Games. The Symposium, co-organized by Rehabilitation International, brought together representatives from government, sport, the disability rights movement and media to discuss the status, current issues and hot topics around human rights for persons with a disability. A webcast of the symposium is available at www.db1.org/IPCWMP/index.html.

Resources
The IPC and Rehabilitation International developed educational toolkits to explain the process of developing a Convention on the Rights and Dignities of Persons with a Disability and the role of Paralympic athletes as advocates.
In addition, the IPC has published a document written by Ms. Cheri Blauwet, US
Paralympic athlete and scholar titled "The Paralympics: Promoting Health and Human Rights through Sport". Ms Blauwet outlines how the Paralympic Movement can be a vehicle to promote the concepts of health and human rights for athletes with a disability.
Source:
Contact:
For more information about the IPC's approach to human rights or publications, please contact, IPC Development Manager at amy.farkas@paralympic.org or visit the IPC website http://www.paralympic.org.




The Position Statement of the IPC on Human Rights
IPC Handbook Section 2, Chapter 2
  1. The Paralympic Vision of IPC is “To Enable Paralympic Athletes to Achieve Sporting Excellence and Inspire and Excite the World”.
  2. IPC believes all individuals should enjoy equal access and opportunities for leisure, recreation and sporting activities, and such rights be granted and guarded by the legal and administrative systems of the responsible governments and communities.
  3. IPC firmly believes in the unlimited athletic potential of persons with a disability, and thereby embraces the sporting achievements of Paralympic athletes. Equal opportunities for sporting development, participation, training, and recognition of achievement should be provided for persons with disabilities in all schools, sports clubs and venues, sports organizations and communities.
  4. The IPC believes in sport as a vehicle to promote peace, which will result in the preservation of human dignity and equality for all.
  5. IPC shall promote the above philosophy and actualize its policy through the Paralympic Games and all other sporting activities, and through its Membership and work with countries, regions, sports, and groups representing persons with a disability.




BEIJING 2008 - The Olympic Games Come To China:
Will Human Rights?
Mickey Spiegel


“How will China’s pervasive censorship and control of domestic and international media and the Internet play out when thousands of international journalists descend on Beijing? How are the Olympic Games being used to justify the violent forced evictions of thousands of people from their homes? As international businesses reach out to the world’s largest consumer market, how do China’s restrictions on labor rights affect workers on the ground? Human Rights Watch hopes that the 2008 Olympics will be an impetus for China to demonstrate greater respect for the human rights guaranteed to all under international law.
Source: http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/china/beijing08
So wrote Human Rights Watch on August 24, 2004, a few days before the city of Athens, host to the 2004 Summer Olympic Games, handed the Olympic flag to Beijing, the 2008 host city. During the intervening two years, as our concerns have deepened, we have continued to ask ourselves, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and China’s leadership the same questions.


Will there be censorship at the Bejing olympics?
Chinese laws and regulations narrow the space for free expression by domestic and foreign press. Contrary to international law, which calls for “freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,” news (Article 19, 1976) reports must largely repeat the government’s factual account and analysis, e-mail is selectively monitored and courts regularly sentence Chinese editors, webmasters, reporters and bloggers alleged to have leaked “state secrets,” “incited subversion,” or “colluded with hostile foreign forces” to prison terms as long as 12 years. Members of the Foreign Correspondents Club of China (FCCC) may not be charged with those offenses but they risk harassment and detention every time they try to cover what Chinese authorities consider a sensitive story, which can include a major traffic jam or an ozone-filled atmosphere (“Widespread Detentions of Foreign Journalists…”, 2006). Existing regulations already restrict where journalists can go and what stories they can cover.
For the 20,000 foreign journalists expected to cover the Beijing Olympics, the most pressing issue will be their freedom to report and analyze the Games without government interference (Kahn, 2006; Wu, 2006). Official accreditation of journalists for the Olympics might be used, as in the past, to reward journalists uncritical of Chinese government policies and to punish critics. Government ownership of almost all Olympic-related media infrastructure – outgoing and incoming wire-line and wireless communications, including telephone and Internet connections, international radio and television signals for broadcasting rights holders and transmission hardware for all television and radio broadcasts destined for international rights holders – will enable Chinese editing of offending broadcasts and interference with their transmission.
During an August 10, 2006 meeting, Liu Qi, president of the Beijing Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games, stressed that China would, as promised, make it “convenient” for foreign journalists to cover the Games. However, he added that in 2007, China would define policies related to foreign media coverage and to employment of Chinese citizens as assistants, both of which could restrict international journalists’ ability to report freely. To date, the most specific guideline restricting media coverage of the 2008 Games is the Press Commission of the Chinese Olympic Committee’s insistence that it vet all requests to interview Chinese athletes (“China to Issue Regulation…”, 2006) .
The IOC has not been especially critical of China’s censorship with respect to the 2008 Games, thus lending credibility to Chinese authorities’ actions. In May 2005, Kevan Gosper, chair of the IOC press commission, suggested that foreign media should respect the way “China manages its communications.” A year later, Hein Verbruggen, head of the IOC’s inspection team, emphasized that the media must respect Chinese law. “If it’s in the law, then it is in the law,” he said. Most recently, IOC Communications Director Giselle Davis admitted that media freedom has a way to go. “No one’s denying,” she said, “that here and now this is a challenge.” Her remarks made particular mention of press freedom in the days before the Games officially open (“IOC Working to Ensure…”, 2006).

Recommendations
  • The IOC should make public any and all regulations and guidelines provided to or imposed on members of the media working on Olympic coverage in Beijing 2008.
  • The IOC should make a commitment that all of the regulations and guidelines will comply with international standards on free expression and freedom of the media. Any violation of these standards should be robustly opposed.

Will olympic project workers have their rights protected ?
There are no independent trade unions in China; there is no right to collective bargaining. All unions are affiliates of the Chinese Communist Party’s All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU). They do little to ensure healthy and safe working conditions, adequate wages and regular pay, or robust grievance mechanisms. There are high rates of occupational illness, innumerable instances of workers paid below the minimum wage, late, or not at all, and, too often, unemployment or imprisonment for those who protest (“Unions Launch Campaign…”, 2006). Migrant workers are particularly vulnerable to these kinds of abuse.
Large numbers of migrant workers have been contracted for Olympics-related projects. In 2004, when the Hebei provincial department of construction signed an agreement on behalf of more than 120,000 new migrant workers headed for Beijing to work on such projects, the city promulgated a series of regulations to ensure that migrant workers would be paid regularly. But in September 2005 workers at the National Conference Center, an Olympic site, refused to leave the site after the sub-contractor they worked for was replaced, fearing that they would lose the three months’ wages owed them. In 2006, the Supreme People’s Court ordered that lower courts speed up settlement of migrant workers’ law suits and assist contractors to collect from the government (“China's Circular Instructs Courts…”, 2006).
Recommendations
  • Olympic sponsors and partners should ensure that every opportunity is taken to press the Chinese government to revise its labor laws so they conform to international standards.
  • International companies engaged in Olympic-related construction should undertake to ensure that they will operate only under conditions and terms that adequately protect workers rights, including the right to timely remuneration and health and safety. They should commit to using their presence as an opportunity to press the Chinese government to revise its labor laws so they conform to international standards.


Will there be redress for forced evictions and inadequate compensations ?
Construction of Olympic sites and attendant upgrading of Beijing’s infrastructure has caused widespread forced evictions; few who have been evicted have received adequate compensation (Ang, 2005). Lack of transparency on the process and restrictions on media make it difficult to assess the full extent of the impact. Nevertheless what reports there are, combined with official information on the process, gives great cause for concern. China is also a party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which guarantees a right to housing. These evictions, without adequate compensation or safeguards, would violate those international commitments.
In March 2004, the head of the Beijing Municipal Administration of State Land, Resources and Housing (SLRH) stated that 5,000 of a projected 6,000 households had already been moved to accommodate Olympic sites (Li, 2004). Several projects have involved the destruction of entire neighborhoods. One such project involves homeowners moved from the site reserved for the Shunyi Olympic Aquatic Park. Another involved the eviction of hundreds of peasants from their homes and fields on the north side of Beijing. Their farmsteads were bulldozed to make way for Olympics-related landscaping and development projects. New jobs were promised, as the residents could no longer farm there, but not delivered, according to one of the residents, a subsistence farmer. A media report from the Nanyingfang section of Chaoyang district in November 2004 describes demolition crews piling residents’ belongings into vans while some 100 police officers watched. Journalists were warned not to photograph residents being sprayed with foam from fire extinguishers or being taken away by police (“Families Dragged From Their Homes”, 2004).
In addition, official plans to “beautify” the city in time for the start of the 2008 Olympic Games, has created new projects likely to result in further forced evictions. Reports indicate many, if not most, victims of these evictions have been, and will be, left without compensation. In June 2005, when the some 1,000 residents evicted for the Aquatic Park blocked the site and demanded compensation, they were advised that local authorities had already received payment. A local spokesperson said: “The land belongs to the village as a whole, so the money should not go directly to the people. The village is entitled to make a decision on how to use the money” (Ang, 2005). The SLRH head, in admitting that 300,000 people would be relocated to accommodate beautification plans, disputed claims that relocations were forced or that those associated with illegal demolitions would go unpunished. Authorities also suggested that compensation rates and new accommodations favor the displaced. However, the system authorities suggest is in place to address the compensation and redress needs of the victims makes such a claim implausible. First a top court ruled that compensation or resettlement disputes are not a matter for the judiciary and instead litigants are to be referred to “relevant government departments” for arbitration. There is no evidence that this government-administered scheme of arbitration is to be independent, transparent, or capable of reaching fair determinations between the interests of the dispossessed and the government. Given China’s weak record in this area, expectations of fairness from the system are low. In addition, victims are not to be allowed seek injunctions against demolitions but are restricted to seeking compensation if their homes are unlawfully or improperly destroyed (“China curbs court access…”, 2005).

Recommendations
  • The Beijing Municipal government must ensure no evictions take place that do not fully comply with international standards regarding the right to housing. This means suitable compensation, due process and legal redress must all be available to those facing eviction.
    The Beijing Municipal government must ensure developers and officials who violate the rights of tenants and landowners are investigated and held accountable.
  • The Beijing Municipal Administration of State Land, Resources and Housing should ensure that all evictees are entitled to and receive adequate compensation and assistance in resettling. Compensation should be made directly to the victims.
  • The central government should ensure there is an appropriate, independent, and effective procedure for determining claims by potential evictees and that the possibility to halting demolitions, which may be illegal, is enforceable.
References
Ang, A. (2005, June 14). Farmers stage land protest at Beijing Olympic venue. Associated Press Newswire.
Article 19. (1976). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 999 U.N.T.S. 171, entered into force, March 23, 1976, signed by China on October 5, 1998, but not yet ratified.
China curbs court access in house demolitions. (2005, August 12). Reuters News.
China's circular instructs courts to help migrant workers recover unpaid wages. (2006, 9 August). BBC Monitoring Asia Pacific.
China to issue regulation on foreign media's coverage at 2008 Olympics. (2006, July 10). People Daily. Retrieved from http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200608/10/eng20060810_291821.html.
Families dragged from their homes. (2004, November 16). Straits Times. Retrieved from http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/sub/asia/story/0,5562,285174,00.html.
IOC working to ensure free media coverage ahead of Beijing Olympics. (2006, 9 August). Kyodo News.
Kahn, J. (2006, July 4). Beijing official says curbs apply to foreign journalists. New York Times. Retrieved from http://select.nytimes.com/ gst/abstract.html?res=FB0C10FF39540C778CDDAE0894DE404482
Li, L. (2004, November 3). City denies reports on large-scale evictions. China Daily. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-03/11/content_313666.htm
Unions launch campaign to safeguard migrant workers. (2006, June 14). People Daily. Retrieved from http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/ 200606/14/ eng20060614_273873.html
Widespread detentions of foreign journalists show China unprepared to host Olympic press corps in 2008. (2006, August 10). Foreign Correspondents Club.
Wu, V. (2006, April 13). Watchdog says no foreign reports: TV stations told to stick to state-run news services. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=43020.

Contact
Mickey Spiegel
Human Rights Watch
New York
USA
E-mail: spiegem@hrw.org



The Wrong Way Around
Keith Gilbert

 

There is a danger that as academics working in sport, we are mistakenly developing the notion that sports are more important than any other aspects of human existence. This is particularly the case with the relationship between sport and human rights. As sport academics, we are often guilty of promoting sport as the panacea for the ills of the world. As a consequence, we may be losing sight of the bona fide relationship between the protection of human rights and sport. As David (2005, p.1) remarks in the context of athletes’ rights:
If we are to understand better how human rights can improve the protection of all young athletes’ rights, the link between human rights and sport must be explored attentively.
This is an interesting point and a clear indicator of the lack of careful research into the links between the protection of human rights and sport, which are backed up by McArdle & Guiliotti (2006, p.1) who argue that:
At first glance, the work of organizations like the IOC suggests that human rights, international development and peace are pivotal to sport.
Sport however, does have strong links with development and peace and not necessarily human rights as this has been proven by the numerous projects being carried out across the world in the name of peacemaking and development. The 2003 Report on the United Nations Interagency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace comprehensively documents a full range of projects that have been pivotal in this regard. However, there is only a brief mention (p. 4) on the topic of human rights and sport, and that section only refers specifically to article 1 of the charter of Physical Education and Sport which was adopted by UNESCO in 1978. This charter states that:
The practice of physical education and sport is a fundamental human right for all. It stresses that every person is entitled to participate in sport, including especially women, young people, the elderly and the disabled.
The Interagency Task Force was a direct result of the UN Millennium Development Goals and generated the impetus for the UN 2006 Sport Development and Peace Report (in print) which highlights the significant projects developed across the world in the 2005 International Year of Sport and Physical Education (IYSPE 2005) and which was so successfully developed by the UN Office of Sport for Development and Peace. Out of this push for sport and development came some important issues which were debated at the 2nd Magglingen Conference on Sport for Development, the 2005 United Nations World Summit, The World Conference for Peace, Solidarity and Development in Spain (2005), The UN and L’Equipe Roundtable on the Indian Ocean Tsunami Aid (2005) and the Sport & Development – Economy, Culture and Ethics Conference organized by ICSSPE at Bad Boll in Germany (2005). Along with these initiatives came the important UNESCO Convention against Doping in Sport meeting in October 2005 that ‘adopted unanimously the International Convention against Doping and Sport’.
It is questionable that these conferences directly related to human rights and sport. Although sport has achieved much in the promotion of sport through development and peace, it is difficult to ascertain how sport assists in supporting the ‘Dimensions of Human Life’ which are grounded in human rights theory. These are as espoused by Kalin et al (2006, p.1) as:
  1. The rights of refugees and displaced persons
  2. Political rights and freedom of expression
  3. Fair trial and prohibition of torture
  4. The right to work
  5. The protection of property
  6. The freedom of thought and belief
  7. The right to education
  8. The protection of private life
  9. The right to food
  10. The right to health
  11. The right to housing
  12. Prohibition of discrimination and
  13. THE RIGHT TO LIFE
We may well ask how important is sport in peoples’ lives? After all, over two billion people worldwide live at or below the poverty line - is it not more important to have food on the table than to have access to sport? We could go back to the universal declaration for human rights for answers to these questions because therein lies the foundations of the arguments which we should be pursuing to the questions which we need to answer on the relationship between human rights and sport.
The recent phenomenon of linking sport and human rights by Kidd and Donnelly (2000) currently gives academics clear directions. They argue that:
Social scientists can contribute in important ways to the promotion of human rights through sports, especially at a time when thinking about human rights issues is becoming more widespread. (p. 145)
There is still a tendency for academics to equate human rights issues with those of development and peace. There is however a clear distinction. Other authors have argued similar points between the relationship between human rights and sport. Sidoti (1999, p. 21) argues that ‘sport is really a soft option’ and reiterates the question posed at the beginning of this paper - we have it ‘the wrong way round’. It should not be how human rights are articulated with sport but ‘whether sport affects the promotion of human rights’. Sidoti suggests, and is right of course, that we seem to have lost the meaning of the term and are in danger of promoting sport through the medium of human rights literature rather than coming from a human rights perspective where sport is a small microcosm of the answer to the problems of individuals’ ‘right to life’. I am suggesting that sport academics need to revisit the human rights literature in order to promote a more balanced approach rather than rely on the ‘power of sport’ to try to `patch up` the problems. As Mary Robinson, UN Human Rights Commissioner, argued in 1998 that if we:
Count up the results of 50 years of human rights mechanisms, 30 years of multi-billion dollar development programmes and endless high level rhetoric and the general impact is quite under-whelming …this is a failure of implementation on a scale that shames us all.
What hope is there of sport making an impact on the human rights issues across the world if human rights mechanisms cannot? Maybe it is possible if we know where we are going as a group. For example, it is clear from the work which came out of the 1999 Human Rights Council of Australia Conference in Sydney, Australia, entitled ‘How you play the game: The contribution of sport to the promotion of human rights’, that there is a need for another such conference to discuss the important issues of human rights and how sport can play a part in supporting the rights of individuals. This conference needs to be developed by the UN and the United Nations Human Rights Commission in conjunction with ICSSPE so that there are positive outcomes and a clear definition of the relationship between human rights and sport. David (2005) started this process by producing a book highlighting the relationship between human rights and youth sport. However, other human rights areas such as gender-based violence, poverty, cruelty, torture, racial discrimination, liberty, education, conflict, health, food and genocide have not been linked to sport. Indeed, can we link sport to some of these important issues? I think not in all cases but I am willing to debate the issues further.
Obviously, some quality papers and books have been developed over the past few years. Please see for example (Burke & Roberts, 2005; Corbett: 1999; David, 2005; Guilianotti, 1999; Hums, 2005; Lapchick, 2005; McArdle, 1999; McArdle & Guilianotti, 2006; Miah: 1999). All are seminal and provide examples of the nature of the relationship between sport and human rights. However, I would still argue that we really do have it ‘the wrong way around’ and that the protection of one’s human rights are much more important than sport. As reported by Amnesty International (2004, paragraph 1) in its Human Rights Report on China:
Despite a few positive steps, no attempt was made to introduce the fundamental legal and institutional reforms necessary to bring an end to serious human rights violations. Tens of thousands of people continued to be detained or imprisoned in violation of their rights to freedom of expression and association, and were at serious risk of torture or ill-treatment.
Consequently, for some, the problems of life are insurmountable. For example, in some parts of Ethiopia, Lebanon, Kosovo, Somalia, Rwanda and other war-ravaged countries, the playing of sport is far from important. As I have indicated elsewhere:
The last thing on peoples’ minds when they are homeless and hungry is the playing of sport; the last thing on peoples’ minds when they are fighting for survival against torture is the playing of sport; the last thing on peoples’ minds when women are being mutilated is the playing of sport; the last thing on severely disabled people’s minds is the playing of sport. If you’re a refugee, sport doesn’t matter unless you’re locked in an internment camp and are looking to pass the time. (Gilbert, 2006, p. 22)
Within this context, sport can be classified as a time filler, an aside, nonessential to daily life and a soft option on the human rights agenda and we need to change this perception. Perhaps we need to do more work like the groundbreaking successes that the ‘Right to Play’ organization is achieving. They believe they can ’empower children and communities to look after themselves and each other’ and they ‘emphasize the best values of sport and strive to inspire respect, compassion, optimism, integrity and joy’. This programme has made a difference to enhancing the quality of life of their target groups. As academics, we can make a difference if we better understand what we are trying to communicate when talking about human rights and sport, and focus our attempts towards these unified objectives.
For example, if survival is the key, health should be an objective and if sport can support the development of health for the marginalized (Cook & Gilbert, 2006), then we should use it as one of a series of tools rather than the panacea. We must put sport in the right perspective and not champion its cause above other more important social issues. Indeed, does sport really matter in relation to human rights? We need to try and get it the right way around.

References
Amnesty International. (2004). China. Retrieved from http://web.amnesty.org/ report2004/chn-summary-eng.
Burke, M., & Roberts, T. (1999, September) Drugs, sport and human rights. Paper presented at the Human Rights Council of Australia Conference, How You Play the Game: The Contribution of Sport to the Promotion of Human Rights. Sydney, Australia.
Cook, K., & Gilbert, K. (2006). Life on the margins: Implications for health research. French’s Forest, Sydney, Australia: Pearson Education
Corbett, D. (1999, September). Ethics and moral behavior in sport: A human rights issue, Paper presented at the Human Rights Council of Australia Conference, How You Play the Game: The Contribution of Sport to the Promotion of Human Rights. Sydney, Australia.
David, P. (2005). Human rights in sport: A critical review of children’s rights in
competitive sports
. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Gilbert, K. (2006). Sport, peace and development. Keynote Speech,
Conference on Sport & Coaching, Johor Bahru Sports Council,
Johor, Malaysia.
Hums, M.A. (2005, October). Sport as a human right: The role of the Olympic Movement. Presented at the annual conference of the North American Society for Sport Sociology, Winston-Salem, NC.
Kalnin, W. Muller, L., & J. Wyttenbach (2006). (Eds.) The face of human rights. Baden, Switzerland: Lars Muller Publications.
Kidd, B. & Donnelly, P. (2000). Human rights in sport, International Review for the Sociology of Sport 35(2), pp. 131-148
Lapchick, R. E. (1999, September). The new racial stereotypes of the 1990’s. Paper presented at the Human Rights Council of Australia Conference, How you Play the Game: The Contribution of Sport to the Promotion of Human Rights, Sydney, Australia.
McArdle, D. (1999). Beyond a boundary: sexual harassment in sports employment. Paper presented at the Human Rights Council of Australia Conference, How You Play the Game: The Contribution of Sport to the Promotion of Human Rights, Sydney, Australia.
McArdle, D., & Giulianotti, R. (2006). (Eds) Sport, civil liberties & human rights. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Miah, A. (1999, September). The human rights of the genetically engineered athlete. Paper presented at the Human Rights Council of Australia Conference, How You Play the Game: The Contribution of Sport to the Promotion of Human Rights. Sydney, Australia.
Robertson, G. (1999). Crimes against humanity: The struggle for global justice. Allan Lane, The Penguin Press.
Sidoti, C. (1999, September). Rules beyond the game, Paper presented at the Human Rights Council of Australia Conference, How You Play the Game: The Contribution of Sport to the Promotion of Human Rights. Sydney, Australia.
United Nations. (2003). Sport for development & peace: Towards achieving the Millennium Goals. Report from the United Nations Inter- Agency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace. New York: Author.
United Nations. (2006). Report on sport development & peace (IYSPE 2005) (in print). New York, NY: Author.


Contact
Dr. Keith Gilbert
University of the West of England
Great Britain
gilbert.keith@gmail.com


Profile - International Year of Sport and Physical Education 2005

The potential for sport to effectively convey messages and influence behavior on one hand, while improving the quality of people's live and promoting peace on the other has been increasingly recognized in recent years. The United Nations has incorporated sport into its programs and into their development and foreign assistance policies.
“Sport is the universal language that can bring people together, no matter what their origin, background, religious beliefs or economic status,” stated United Nations Secretary-General, Kofi Annan.
The International Year of Sport and Physical Education 2005 (IYSPE 2005), proclaimed by the United National General Assembly, aimed to raise awareness among the general public and encourage communities, organizations and individuals to share their knowledge about the value of sport. It also sought to create the right conditions for more sports-based development programs and projects.
Under the leadership of Mr. Adolf Ogi, Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on Sport for Development and Peace, the International Year provided a unique opportunity to focus the world's attention on the importance of sport in society and on how sport and physical education programmes can be used as tools to help combat challenges such as extreme poverty, conflict, and HIV/AIDS and help achieve the Millennium Development Goals.
Sport and physical education play a vital role at all levels of society.
For the individual, sport enhances one's personal abilities, general health, and self-knowledge. On the national level, sport and physical education contribute to economic and social growth, improve public health and bring different communities together. On the global level, if used consistently, sport and physical education can have a long-lasting positive impact on development, public health, peace and the environment.
Access to and participation in sport and physical education provides an opportunity to enjoy social and moral inclusion for populations otherwise marginalized by social, cultural, or religious barriers due to gender, disability or other distinctions. Through sport and physical education, individuals can experience equality, freedom and a dignifying means for empowerment. The control over one's body, experienced while practicing sport, is particularly valuable for girls and women, for people with disabilities, for those affected by armed conflict and for people recovering from trauma.
The success of IYSPE 2005 has led to a growing network of governments, organizations, groups and individuals around the world who were made aware of sport and physical education's vital role in contributing to education, health, development and peace. Seventy countries from all continents set up national committees or national focal points to plan, coordinate and implement national observance of the Year. Additionally, 52 other countries reported on commemorative activities without having officially appointed such a national focal point. Finally, 20 international and over 18 regional conferences were organized during the year, connecting the role of sport with the issues of development, health, culture, environment, peace, gender and education.
The United Nations is building on the momentum of IYSPE 2005 to encourage mainstreaming of Sport for Development and Peace into the global development agenda and into government policies and programs. The General Assembly has requested the preparation of an Action Plan to strengthen United Nations partnerships with Governments, sport-related organizations and the private sector, and this will be considered at its session this fall.


Contact:
Richard Leonard
Communications Specialist
United Nations New York Office of Sport
for Development and Peace
405 Lexington Avenue
Chrysler Building, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10174
Tel. 212 457 1254;
Fax 212 254 4039


How You Play the Game:
Creating Sport Programming to Promote and Protect Human Rights
Anita Keller

 

Abstract
The author spent the last four years working in “developing” and post-war nations creating sports programs that include and advocate for people with war-related disabilities. The article discusses how international Sport for Development organizations and national government institutions around the world are working to develop programming that encourages the values of human dignity. It notes where these organizations may still be falling short in their goals. The article suggests best practices for individuals/organizations planning sport programs seeking to promote and protect human rights.

Introduction
In the past 10 years, a new and growing interest in the Sport for Development movement has emerged. This movement received heightened international attention when the United Nations named 2005 the International Year of Sport and Physical Education. Though the principles behind the movement may not be entirely new, an increased number of international organizations have begun working in developing countries in recent years. Organizations are popping up everywhere, all with the intention of using sport as a vehicle to improve the lives of individuals and entire communities. Organizations such as Right to Play, Grassroots Soccer, Sports for Life and Playing for Peace are just a few. Working hand in hand with local organizations and national governments, these organizations develop accessible and educational sport programs.
Though the organizations vary in size, focus area and approach to programming, they all share the belief that sport can be a cost-effective, extremely enticing and exciting method to stimulate development. “Development” can include a variety of improvements to quality of life such as improved health, education and economic opportunity. Development should be considered a human right in and of itself, but it is also a process leading to the protection of human rights and dignity. Sport can be considered similarly. In recent years, many have contended that the access to sport is itself a human right (UNESCO, n.d.). Sport, however, can also be used as a vehicle for achieving, promoting and protecting human rights (Blauwett, 2005). This can only be done however, if program planners and participants are aware of the issues connecting sport and human rights and consistently strive to use a human rights approach to program planning and implementation.

Stories from the Field
Both national governments/organizations and international non-profits are making great efforts to increase access to sport and recreation for people living in developing nations, including women, children and people with disabilities. Though the international community is being made more aware of the relationship between sport and human rights, it is clear there is a long way to go before sports programming consistently promotes and protects human rights. The following examples from my own experience demonstrate areas where even the best-intentioned programs reinforce a violation of human rights. I have intentionally excluded names and logistical details in order to protect the identity of the individuals interviewed.
Vietnam
In 2005, during my visit to a national sports training facility in Hanoi, Vietnam, athletes with disabilities explained that though all athletes present had recently qualified for an upcoming international sporting event, only a select few would be considered by the government of Vietnam to actually participate in this event. They knew, however, that a higher percentage of their “able-bodied” counterparts would be chosen to participate. They also mentioned that athletes with disabilities were only allowed to use this particular facility after 06:00 during special training periods such as this one. They said this was a common rule for many of the top sporting facilities in Hanoi. Though they said they were discouraged by these practices, they also recognized a need to continue to give their best effort in order to increase the opportunities for future athletes with disabilities in Vietnam.
United States/Africa
Recently I spoke with the leading member of an organization that brings professional basketball players from the United States to African countries to teach about HIV/AIDS through basketball. The participants in the first two programs had been predominantly “able-bodied” boys. I approached this leader with the idea of a partnership so that more athletes of different backgrounds could be included in this beneficial program. When I suggested we find a way to include our wheelchair basketball athletes and work to attract participants with disabilities, his response was “That’s not our thing.” Unfortunately, this is not an uncommon response. However, it was extremely disappointing considering the recent reports stating people with disabilities are equally vulnerable to HIV/AIDS as their able-bodied counterparts (Groce & Trasi, 2004).
A Country in Africa
Several years ago, the National Paralympic Committee held a workshop for trainers, referees and athletes involved in the budding wheelchair basketball program. During the workshop, the trainers and referees (all of whom were “able-bodied”) were provided with double or quadruple rooms. The athletes, all of whom had a physical disability, were placed in group rooms. Many of them did not have proper beds and were required to sleep on foam mattresses on the floor. During lunch, trainers and referees were given the choice between two meals, one European-style, the other African-style. The athletes were automatically provided with the African-style meal. After the second day, the athletes wrote a letter to the Committee and staged a small protest. The following day they were allowed a choice of meals and the Committee made an effort to be sure each athlete had decent sleeping accommodations.
Paralympic Games
The Paralympic Games are considered by many to be a shining example of how sport can be used to promote human rights. These Games highlight the skills and abilities of athletes with physical and some sensory disabilities. Athletes with disabilities from around the world have demonstrated their skills and strengths in this international venue. However, athletes from developing countries have a difficult time being able to participate in these Games. First, they face the obvious challenges of obtaining any resources at all for training and competition. But even more impossible to overcome are athlete classification systems and equipment standards that teams from developing countries simply can not meet, at least not without foreign intervention. Although governing bodies create these systems and standards to protect the athlete and provide growth opportunities for the sport, they have all been created in developed countries where the survivors of various disabilities and the equipment available are simply different and unequal to those in developing countries. Athletes from developing countries will continue to be consistently excluded from certain sports until the rules are adapted or the quality of life in these countries is significantly improved.
United States
As a teenage student, growing up in the mid-western United States in the 1990s, I played competitive sports for my junior and senior high schools. During that time, my fellow female athletes and I often mourned the fact that our teams were never issued new uniforms. Every other year, the boys’ teams received new uniforms and the girls’ teams were provided with the hand-me-downs of the boys teams from the year before. This was viewed as an effective cost-cutting measure by the (all male) administration of the schools. Interestingly, I was told two years ago that this practice still continues.
This example seems unimportant compared to the challenges faced by the individuals mentioned earlier in this paper, who often have no access to equipment whatsoever. However, it definitely sent an insidious message to all the female athletes, “You deserve less than the male athletes.” It also shows how common inequitable resource distribution is, even in the United States, where the amount of resources available for sport is probably greater than anywhere else in the world.
In each of these examples, well-intentioned organizations reinforce social insults to human dignity. These situations may not seem extreme because they simply reinforce the status quo within a given society. They reinforce the idea that one group is better than another and therefore more deserving of resources. Luckily, we also often see members of groups affected by these ideas standing up and changing them. They are able to use the sport field as a playing field for addressing larger societal issues. This of course can only be done in an environment open and conducive for change.

Recommended Best Practices
The challenge to use sport as a tool to address human rights issues starts within the programs themselves. Governments continue to develop laws making access to sport a right for all, but acceptance of these laws can take a long time, and even after ratification, may often be of low priority for enforcement. Also, the laws do not explain how to make sport a right for all and can leave room for interpretation. It is therefore crucial that people involved in sports programming be aware of the need for a human rights approach in program planning and implementation.
During the last four years, I have worked with a program called Sports for Life, which is dedicated to increasing sporting opportunities for people with disabilities. The intention of the program is to use sport as a tool to allow people with disabilities to advocate for themselves within the world of sport and beyond. The programs have achieved important successes, but have also faced frustrations and shortfalls. The lessons learned through these programs lead to the following suggestions of best practices for program planners:
  1. Seek diversity in top management staff/advisors. It is amazing to witness the number of development organizations, including those within sport for development circles, whose primary decision making body lacks diversity in gender, race, physical ability/disability and socio-economic status. Without members who possess direct experience from a variety of social perspectives, decision makers often make decisions based on their own experience or based on research often generated by individuals/organizations with similar make-ups. This is not to say these individuals are incapable of making good decisions for the people they serve. It simply shows the need for making our organizations inclusive and diverse at the very top levels in an effort to ensure the individuals we serve are in fact actors in their own destinies and not simply acted upon. As exemplary organizations, it is imperative to practice what we preach, especially at the highest levels.
  2. Promote diversity/inclusivity in early stages of program planning. Needs assessments should include a variety of members of the community, not just high-ranking members of the sport community. The groups involved in needs assessments and program planning should represent the diversity of the entire community. If there is potential for tension between various members of this community, such as between different ethnic groups, men and women, or people of different social rank, it is important to create an atmosphere where people will feel comfortable talking with each other.
  3. Promote diversity in staff/volunteers/trainers. Engaging diverse staff members in countries where a certain ethnic group, gender, or social class has been excluded from education and leadership opportunities is particularly challenging. Often the candidates who appear to be the “best” in a Curriculum Vitae or during an interview come from very similar backgrounds. Seek to engage a well-rounded staff made up of individuals who can make different contributions based on their own personal experiences.
  4. Seek ways to include a democratic process in program activities. Many people in post-war countries, especially those who are socially disenfranchised, have never had the chance to vote and do not have experience in making this kind of choice. Sport provides ample opportunities to present ways for choosing a leader and recognizing individuals or groups for various strengths. The group should discuss what qualities make a good leader and decide a process for safe and secure voting that will be accessible to all members. This can be an exciting and enlightening exercise for groups including members who cannot read, hear, see, or have other challenges prohibiting them from voting in the traditional manner.
  5. Find ways to award skills/qualities besides “winning.” Keeping a humane perspective in competitive sports can be particularly challenging, since the main goal is to “win, win, win” rather than ensure your opponent has an equal opportunity. It is therefore important for program planners to find ways to award individuals/teams for strengths, besides simply winning a game or being the strongest athlete. Teams need to recognize that each team member brings value and a particular strength. Sportsmanship Awards, Most Improved Player/Team Awards, Best Attitude Awards and the like can go a long way in building leadership and teamwork. The group should be allowed to identify how these awards are given, utilizing a democratic process.
  6. Guarantee equitable equipment distribution. Ministries of Youth and Sport in developing countries consistently demonstrate inequity in equipment distribution. Female athletes and athletes with disabilities almost always receive less equipment, prize money, facility access and other resources from government bodies (if they receive anything at all) than their male, able-bodied counterparts. It is important to ensure groups within programs have equal access to equipment and facilities.
  7. Include non-competitive, cooperative games. Cooperative games are great ways to accomplish a team goal while including people of all different sizes, ages, genders, races and ability levels. While these games are especially effective in building teamwork for a group that expects to work together, they are also valuable in getting teams that may often compete against each other to come together in a non-competitive way.
  8. Consider diversity in programming. It is important to consider the varied interests in a community when planning programs. Program planners should strive to reach as broad and inclusive an audience as possible. It is unlikely, for example, that a group of women with disabilities is going to want to participate in a program teaching only wheelchair rugby. A program intending to address the needs of people with disabilities should also include an element to attract women and girls. It is important to note this suggestion is not meant to “dilute” a program’s focus or message. One program cannot possibly provide programming for every group in a community. It is also impossible to address every issue that exists in a community. An organization known for using basketball to teach children about HIV/AIDS does not need to suddenly include football to teach peace as a part of its programming. However, it would be good to find ways to include female basketball players and wheelchair basketball athletes in the program. This can be done within the program itself or by cooperating with other organizations in the community.
  9. Hold regular “sector” meetings with other Sport for Development organizations. Within the field of international development, it is fairly common for organizations working in the same sector to hold regular sector meetings. Donors or hosting government bodies for large sectors such as health, education and emergency aid often require these meetings in an effort to avoid redundancy of services and to ensure as many parts of the community are being served in a coordinated and organized way as possible. Probably because our sector (Sport for Development organizations) is still small and because there is no form of external policing, this kind of meeting does not consistently take place in the field. Because the programs are often small, one organization may not even know about another organization working 15 miles or 20 kilometers away. This lack of coordination leads to an unnecessary loss of myriad opportunities for collaboration and growth among Sport for Development organizations, as well as a potentially lower quality of services for participants.
  10. Avoid enabling corrupt governments/political parties. Governments and political parties will often want to take credit for athletes, especially when they have reached an elite, international level. It is natural for athletes to want to show national pride and this should be encouraged when it is appropriate. Individuals should always be allowed to express their opinions and affiliations. However, athletes/teams should not be used to advocate for a political party or as a “good example” from a corrupt regime, especially against their will. Programs planned by non-governmental, non-profit organizations should not be used as political platforms.
  11. Encourage sportsmanship and mutual respect between teams. Program planners should encourage all participants to behave in a respectful way. Starting and finishing games with a handshake (crutchshake, or wheelchair tap as appropriate) sets the stage for the rest of the activity. Sportsmanship Awards during competitions demonstrate the appreciation for fair play. Qualified and skilled referees and trainers guarantee practices and competitions proceed in a respectful way.
  12. Develop tools and systems for monitoring and evaluation. Sport for Development organizations need to develop meaningful tools for self-evaluation and sector evaluation. These tools should monitor the progress of the intended program goal (i.e. number of athletes with reduced risk of contracting HIV/AIDS), but should also include methods for evaluating the promotion and protection of human rights within the program.
Conclusion
This list is merely a beginning of how to develop sport programs that serve as examples to the world at large. It is up to program planners and participants to constantly monitor and manage their own programs to promote and protect human rights and to share their suggestions for improvement with the Sport for Development community.

References
Blauwet, C. (2005). Promoting the health and human rights of individuals with a disability through the Paralympic Movement.” International Paralympic Committee. Retrieved from www.paraympic.org.
Groce N., & Trasi, R. ( 2004). Rape of individuals with disability: AIDS and the folk belief of virgin cleansing. The LANCET, 363, 1663-1664.

UNESCO. (n.d.) International Charter of Physical Education and Sport. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org/education/information/nfsunesco/pdf/


Contact
Anita Keller
Sports for Life Program Manager
Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation
Washington
USA
akeller@vi.org


Human Rights of Women and Girls in Sport:
A Case Study of the Afghan Youth Sports Exchange
Kabul, Afghanistan
Awista Ayub

     

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present the results of the first Afghan Youth Sports Exchange (AYSE) girls’ soccer clinic in Kabul, Afghanistan held in April of 2006 and demonstrate the strong correlation between athletics and human rights of girls and women in Afghanistan. Four Afghan-American coaches traveled with the AYSE Director to lead girls’ soccer clinics on the ground in Kabul in coordination with the Afghanistan National Olympic Committee (ANOC) and the Afghanistan Football Federation (AFF). Soccer equipment was shipped and distributed to players and coaches in order to provide the resources and tools to ensure proper support for the girls programs with the ANOC and AFF. In addition to the players’ clinic, a coaches’ clinic was set-up in collaboration with the German Football Federation. The clinic proved effective in bringing female coaches from around the city together to discuss the best methodologies for training girls’ soccer. The success of the program was measured by immediate feedback from players and coaches as well as officials with the ANOC and AFF. Two girls from the 2004 AYSE girls’ soccer camp received the 2006 Arthur Ashe Award for Courage from ESPN at the ESPY Awards on behalf of girls’ soccer in Afghanistan.


About the Afghan Youth Sports Exchange (AYSE)
The Afghan Youth Sports Exchange (AYSE) is a non-profit organization dedicated to equipping Afghanistan’s youth with leadership skills required to promote athletics in their schools and communities. AYSE was founded by Awista Ayub, an Afghan-American, based on the concept of using sports as a tool to promote leadership among children in Afghanistan. The AYSE’s vision is to create a structured youth sports system that will support and cultivate future sports leaders for Afghanistan, utilizing already established programs on the ground, while working to address human rights issues through athletics.
In 2004, the Exchange’s initial mission was achieved with the arrival in the United States of a fully-sponsored girls’ soccer team from Kabul, Afghanistan. The team worked together at a sports leadership camp run and organized by AYSE in preparation for competition in the International Children’s Games held in Cleveland, Ohio.

AYSE NOW…
In spring 2006, two years after the first camp, AYSE traveled to Afghanistan bringing four Afghan-American soccer coaches to work with 15 teams registered under the ANOC through the AFF. The goal for the 2006 girls’ soccer clinic was to raise more awareness about girls’ soccer in Afghanistan by recruiting players and coaches and providing them with the tools necessary to improve the current status of girl’s soccer in Afghanistan.

Assessed Needs
Afghanistan’s infrastructure is still in its rebuilding phase and one key area that needs to be addressed is youth sports. There are many lessons that children can learn from playing sports: leadership, self-confidence, unity, and teamwork towards a common goal. As a result of thirty years of continuous warfare, most Afghan children have not had the opportunity to play sports nor have they received the proper training and coaching in order to achieve a high level of success in athletics. A social structure now exists that will allow new athletic programs to be introduced.
Schools are operational again, but there is further need to incorporate athletics into the curriculum. Afghan children have some access to athletic facilities such as basketball and volleyball courts, but they would benefit from formal training in order to learn the rules, regulations, techniques and drills necessary to master their sport. In addition to the physical benefits, an active sports program would provide children with a therapeutic outlet to release emotions resulting from witnessing years of warfare.
Currently, few people are addressing the need to rebuild youth sports programs in Afghanistan even though a strong program would help cultivate future coaches, Olympic athletes and provide Afghan children with the skills they may also apply to their own society and government as adults. AYSE aims to provide dynamic leadership and athletic training in the hope that young athletes will start sports programs in their schools.
By working to break down gender barriers, athletics can become an effective tool to address human rights issues for women in developing countries like Afghanistan. According to Article 10(g) and 13(c) of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, boys and girls should receive the same opportunities to participate actively in sports and physical education and, boys and girls should also be given the right to participate in recreational activities, sports and all aspects of cultural life (United Nations, 1981). Until 1978, when Afghanistan was invaded by Soviet forces, Afghanistan’s culture was progressive towards providing equal opportunities for education and athletics to both boys and girls. Afghanistan fielded local school girls’ teams in various sports including basketball and volleyball. Human rights and equal access to athletics was not a concern. Today though, the youth sports structure in Afghanistan has deteriorated and both boys and girls suffer from a lack of adequate programs for youth sports. The AYSE with the ANOC and the AFF is providing the framework for programs that will once again allow for an equal playing field and ensure that human rights through athletics are upheld in Afghanistan for boys and girls.
Athletics is able to address human rights issues internationally because of the positive life lessons it instills in children. In a recent briefing report on using sports to create spaces and build social assets for female athletes, Martha Brady (2005, p. 2) with the Population Council, notes that athletics offers girls access to and visibility in the public sphere, allowing them opportunities to:
  • develop new and valued life skills;
  • form friendships and expand their social networks;
  • enjoy freedom of expression and movement;
  • receive mentoring support from appropriate, trusted adults; and
  • take advantage of new learning and educational opportunities.
By providing access to the public sphere, equality becomes a necessity in society and young girls in Afghanistan will be able to gain strength from athletics to become proactive in their community once again. The 2006 AYSE Girls Soccer Clinic was able to address basic human rights issues by leveling the playing field for female athletes and giving them equal access to equipment, fields and coaches.
In addition, gender roles in Afghanistan are very strict with a stark line between men and women. Athletics for women can help to break down current gender norms. Today, Afghan women are becoming more involved in society after 30 years of war. They are now running for President and being elected to seats in the new Parliament. Athletics for girls can work to further reintegrate women in society, returning Afghanistan to the egalitarian society, which existed up until 1978, prior to the Soviet invasion. According to Brady “by seeing girls in this new action-oriented role, boys learn about the strengths, capabilities and contributions of girls and women, which in turn may begin to reshape male traditional gender roles. In brief, sport helps transform the ways girls view themselves and the ways in which their families, boys and communities perceive them.” (2005, p. 2)
Athletics is also an effective tool that developing countries have utilized to promote peace building among groups. The Swiss Foundation for World Affairs (2004) noted that “Sports are an effective but highly undervalued tool in peace building and development. If systematically employed, sports can improve public health, reduce violence, diminish social and ethnic tensions in conflict regions and help build more inclusive communities.”
For developing countries like Afghanistan, athletics has the ability to address a number of social issues in a constructive manner towards breaking down current gender barriers and human rights concerns.

Objectives and Goals Achieved (2004-06)
With the support of the Afghanistan National Olympic Committee (ANOC) and the Afghanistan Football Federation (AFF) AYSE has:
1. Built athletic and leadership skills among girls and young women
Activity Goals:
  1. Organize soccer clinics.
  2. Develop a soccer curriculum for Instructors, Coaches, Referees and Administrators.
  3. Organize a coaches’ seminar for the 15 female soccer coaches in Kabul.
Goals Achieved:
  • AYSE organized a five day soccer clinic that included players training, coaches training and an organized game for the Afghanistan Elite National Girl’s Soccer Team.
  • AYSE coaches developed a comprehensive players’ curriculum, which they utilized on and off the field in order to teach the fundamentals of soccer while allowing the girls to have fun on the field.
  • The German Football Federation led a coaches’ training program in order to teach the female soccer coaches the fundamentals of organizing an effective practice on the field.
2. Created regular activities by forming city-wide girls’ soccer leagues.
Activity Goals:
  1. Hold a soccer clinic with focus on league establishment and organization.
  2. Distribute equipment to players and coaches.
Goals Achieved:
  • The AYSE Girls Soccer Clinic brought teams from across the city together for the first time to play soccer. The clinic worked to establish the links necessary to allow the coaches and players to establish relationships with other teams after the camp. Prior to the camp, teams practiced in their own region and did not meet with other teams outside their school or community to play games. AYSE provided this opportunity for both players and coaches.
  • AYSE distributed $10,000 worth of new and used equipment to players – many of whom did not have a soccer ball or a pair of cleats prior to the clinic. All of the soccer equipment sent to Afghanistan was distributed directly to the players. In addition, AYSE donated field equipment to the Afghanistan Football Federation in order to allow coaches to set up effective practice sessions. Field equipment included cones, corner flags, soccer balls, whistles, clip boards and first aid kits.
3. Created an open forum to identify needs of girls and young women
Activity Goals:
  1. Organize a regional tournament and friendly games including all of the girls’ soccer teams in Kabul (regional teams).
Goals Achieved:
  • AYSE organized a full field game for the Afghanistan Elite National Girls Soccer Team, which was the first time the team played together on a grass field.
Overall Success and Deliverables
  • AYSE worked with over 250 girls in a three-day soccer clinic.
    - Currently 15 teams are registered with the Afghanistan National Olympic Committee.
  • AYSE handed out a soccer ball and a pair of cleats to every girl in the program.
    - AYSE raised $10,000 in the form of new and used equipment, which was distributed directly to the players and the Afghanistan Football Federation.
  • AYSE worked with 15 female soccer coaches in collaboration with the German Football Federation towards organizing a one-day coaches’ seminar in order to teach the coaches how to set up effective practice sessions for their teams.
  • · AYSE provided an opportunity for four Afghan-American soccer coaches to travel to Afghanistan and work as coaches for the clinic.
  • AYSE initiated discussions/meetings between the Afghanistan National Olympic Committee Officials, the Afghanistan Football Federation and the female soccer coaches, allowing the coaches to voice their needs and concerns for the future of women’s soccer in Afghanistan.
  • AYSE coaches trained the Afghanistan Elite National Girl’s Soccer Team and organized a full-field game, which allowed the players to showcase their skills on the field. This was the first time the Afghanistan Elite team played on a full grass soccer field.
  • As a result of the AYSE 2006 Girls Soccer Clinic in Kabul, Afghanistan, the Afghanistan Football Federation donated an equipment room to be used by the women’s soccer division to store equipment for each team.
Follow-up
The 2006 AYSE Girls Soccer Clinic was a success. The clinic laid the foundation for future sports camps in Afghanistan so that AYSE can reach out to more girls and boys in an effort to teach athletic and leadership skills to the future generation of leaders for Afghanistan.
Sports have the power to create a strong social network among children, in particular youth. “Affiliation with a recognized team or group provides girls with a sense of belonging and their role as a team member can give girls an identity beyond the domestic realm” (Brady, 2005, p. 3).

AYSE in the Media
The 2006 AYSE Girls Soccer Clinic and tournament were featured on ESPN during the 2006 ESPY Awards. Millions of viewers tuned in to the 2006 ESPY Awards and had an opportunity to learn about the lives of two of the AYSE soccer girls, Shamila Kohestani and Roia Ahmad, both of whom received the Arthur Ashe Award for Courage on behalf of girls’ soccer in Afghanistan. The film showcased the positive impact soccer has had on the girls’ lives and explored the lives of women in Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban.
In addition to the ESPN ESPY Awards feature, the 2006 AYSE Girls Soccer Clinic was featured on ABC Nightly News, Glamour Magazine, SportsIllustrated.com and The New York Daily News.

For more information on AYSE contact Awista Ayub, AYSE Founder and Director, at Awista@afghansports.org. Please log onto the AYSE website at www.afghansports.org.

References
Brady, M. (2005). Letting girls play: Using sport to create safe spaces and build social assets. Population Council Brief no. 1 May 2005 – Promoting health, safe and productive transitions to adulthood, 1-4.
Swiss Foundation for World Affairs. (2004, November 1). More than just a game: The role of sports in international relations. Retrieved from www.sportanddev.org.
United Nations. (1981, September 2). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/e1cedaw.htm.


Contact
Awista Ayub
The Afghan Youth Sports Exchange
Afghanistan
Awista@afghansports.org


Human Rights and Animal Welfare: The Implications of Anti-hunting Legislation in the United Kingdom
David McArdle

 

Abstract
This paper considers the relationship between human rights and animal welfare, with particular reference to the United Kingdom. It provides an analysis of recent court decisions concerning the legality of legislation that bans hunting with hounds in England and Wales and considers whether that legislation complies with the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. Certain legal and factual weaknesses in the hunting fraternity’s case are highlighted, notably those concerning the ambit of Articles 8 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the putative conservation and other benefits of hunting with hounds.

Introduction
The subject matter of this paper is the relationship between human rights and animal welfare in the United Kingdom, and particularly the role played by the legislature and the courts in the recent development of that relationship within the specific context of hunting with hounds. In order to explore that issue, and in deference to the writer’s academic subject background, the paper takes the form of an extended case note on a recent judgment of the England and Wales Court of Appeal, namely R v HM Attorney General, ex parte the Countryside Alliance. 1
The case represents the latest, and perhaps the final, round of the hunting fraternity’s ongoing struggle with the legislature over the criminalisation of hunting with hounds in England and Wales. 2 That struggle commenced in earnest in 1997, when the Labour party incorporated into its election manifesto a clear commitment to ban hunting with hounds in the event of it being successful in that year’s general election. Following Labour’s electoral victory, there ensued a conflict between the government of the day and MPs on all sides over what the provisions of the anti-hunting legislation should be; this was followed by the House of Lords attempting to reject the legislation passed by the House of Commons, and subsequently by litigation that sought to have the legislation struck down on the ground that the legislative procedures used for enacting it were themselves unlawful. 3 While those aspects of the hunting debate fall outside the scope of this paper, they provide a fascinating insight into the political and constitutional issues underpinning it; what follows should be read with that background in mind. 4

The legislative history
The Hunting Act 2004, s. 1 rendered unlawful an activity that had, on its face, taken place on British soil since the iron age; namely, riding on horseback in order to facilitate the hunting of a wild animal with a dog or a pack of dogs. Hunting a wild animal with a dog, or assisting others to do so, is now a criminal offence punishable by a fine, currently not exceeding £5000. 5 There is a defence if the activity is exempt because it amounts to stalking or flushing the animal out of cover, carried out in order to reduce or prevent serious damage to game or wild birds kept for the purposes of their being shot. 6
An important aspect of the case, so far as the human rights element is concerned, is that the legislation eventually enacted was not that which the government had envisaged. After the Labour government’s coming to power in 1997, the implementation of anti-hunting legislation involved a long and convoluted process that culminated in the House of Commons rejecting the government’s proposed hunt licensing scheme in favour of an outright ban. Thereafter, the Commons was constrained to invoke the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 to circumvent the largely unelected and hereditary House of Lords’ failure to consent to the Bill that had been passed by the elected House of Commons. 7 The Commons, a majority of whose members were of the opinion that hunting with hounds was cruel and that only an outright ban was appropriate, thus won the day and the Hunting Act 2004 came into force in February 2005.

The claim
The applicants in ex p Countryside Alliance challenged the legislation on various grounds, namely the Act’s alleged incompatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights 1953 and the ‘free movement’ provisions of European Union law (which fall outside the scope of this paper). The most significant Convention provisions were Article 8 (right to privacy and right of respect for the home); Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association); and Article 1 of the First Protocol (protection of property). Under the terms of the Human Rights Act 1998 (the enactment of which was another central tenet of Labour’s 1997 election manifesto), the UK courts are required to consider whether UK law is compatible with these fundamental rights and freedoms as enshrined in the Convention, and if it is not, to make a declaration of incompatibility – a step that is tantamount to declaring that the legislation in question is invalid. The claimants in ex p Countryside Alliance (all of whom were heavily involved in hunting and in some cases relied upon it for their livelihoods) 8 thus asserted that the Hunting Act 2004 was incompatible with Articles 8 and 11 and with the First Protocol, and sought a declaration to that effect.
The challenge under Article 8 involved several aspects: first, that the ban on hunting with hounds infringed the right to respect of the participants’ private lives because, although hunting takes place in the public sphere rather than in the home, it was central to the lives of the claimants because it provided all or most of their recreational pursuits and social outlets. Second, the fact that landowners who had made their land available for hunting were no longer able to do so meant there was an interference with the right to respect for their home. Third, hunt servants would lose their jobs and, in some cases, their homes if hunting were banned.
The Article 11 challenge alleged that the 2004 Act amounted to a prohibition on, or significant interference with, hunt members’ freedom to associate in and around hunting. Finally, the challenge under Article One of the First Protocol alleged that the Act deprived landowners of property rights, and/or the right to peacefully enjoy them. For the government, the Attorney General accepted there was a potential infringement of the First Protocol, but asserted that ‘even taking the (Alliance’s) case at its highest, the interference that is feared will not be of a sufficient weight or level to engage the protection of the Convention’. 9

The decision
The court at first instance rejected the Article 8 challenge, and this decision was upheld on appeal. Both courts took the view that the principles emanating from the existing case law on aspects of Article 8 did not extend to cover the circumstances to hand, 10 for any ruling to the contrary would ‘confer a broad right to do anything a person chooses to do, privately or publicly, alone or in conjunction with others’.11 At first instance May, LJ said that although ‘the ban scarcely impinges on (hunters’) personality or development, nor intrudes upon essential social relationships…(and while) those for whose families hunting has been a central, personal and community activity for generations may stand differently…the number of people affected to the extent that they are able to at least make a case for interference under Article 8 must be quite small. This would affect the question of justification and proportionality’12 which is considered below.
As to the possibility that some of the applicants would lose their jobs or their homes if the Act were to remain in force, the Court of Appeal commented that:
However much one may sympathise … the last 50 years have seen the destruction, for various reasons, of many people’s way of life in this country, often by deliberate decisions by government. The collapse of the heavy manufacturing and the coal-mining industries are just two cases in point.… Even if the feared consequences do arise (an outcome that is still far from certain) they will not be caused by any lack of respect in Article 8 terms for the appellants’ private or family life or for their homes. We do not consider that any question of respect for their private life or family life or their home comes into play. 13
A finding to the contrary would amount to upholding that an individual has a ‘right to work’ – a concept that Lord Denning, MR had come dangerously close to upholding in Nagle v Fielden, 14 but one that has no basis in English law.
Finally, the court also noted that the European Court of Human Rights had previously ruled in Bullock v United Kingdom 15 that the keeping of pets is not a right under Article 8 so the possibility of having to kill dogs, and perhaps horses, that had hitherto been used for hunting purposes did not invoke the Convention16– a point that illustrates the distinction that must be drawn between animal welfare and any concept of animal ‘rights’ under Convention jurisprudence.
The Article 11 claim that was also rejected at first instance, this time on the ground that the 2004 Act only indirectly prevented people from meeting: put another way, it prevented them meeting for the purposes of engaging in the hunt and had not directly affected their freedom of association. By way of analogy, ‘we should not, for instance, be inclined to hold that banning the consumption of spirits would interfere with the freedom to assemble and associate at a public house of those who only drink whisky or gin’. 17
On appeal, it was recognised by counsel for the Countryside Alliance that given the court of first instance and the Court of Appeal’s unwillingness to countenance the wide interpretation of Article 8 that would have been necessary for the hunting lobby to succeed under that head, there was little chance of it being willing to do so in respect of the Article 11 claim. 18 Notwithstanding that, the Court of Appeal affirmed that ‘it cannot be said that the Hunting Act interferes with the right of the appellants to assemble. All that it does is to prohibit a particular activity once the appellants have assembled’. 19
In contrast, both the court at first instance and the Court of Appeal were willing to countenance that rights under the First Protocol had been infringed. This was due largely to the fact that the lawyers for the Attorney General had conceded as much – albeit only to the extent that the ban diminished the value of land and other property or damaged the established goodwill of a hunting-related business. 20 While this may seem a questionable admission to make given that the European Court of Human Rights had previously stated 21 that hunting, including hunting with dogs, was essentially a leisure activity ‘notwithstanding the history and culture associated with it and other benefits it may bring’, 22 it can better be seen as a pragmatic concession that afforded the Court of Appeal an opportunity to consider whether the legislation was a justifiable, proportionate response to the evil that Parliament sought to remedy.
Space considerations prevent the detailed exploration that this most complex of issues merits. However, put at its most straightforward, one can say that once the Commons had decided in the course of its debates that hunting with hounds was an inherently cruel pastime – a finding it was perfectly at liberty to reach given the weight of scientific and popular opinion - its decision to press for an outright, total ban on the practice was an entirely appropriate response. This was the case even though the government of the day had favoured a licensing system over outright prohibition, the government’s view being that licences ought to be available in circumstances where hunting with hounds represented ‘least suffering’ in situations where conservation requirements demanded that the population of deer, foxes, hare or mink be controlled.
On this matter the Court of Appeal said as follows:
Had (the aim of the Act) been ‘least suffering’…then no doubt the court would have to look carefully at whatever reasons the legislature might have had for thinking that in a particular case hunting did not meet the test of least suffering, and therefore should be banned for that reason, taken on its own. But that is not the case. Because of the view taken of the implications for hunting as a sport, what is required is that there should have been sufficient material available to the legislators to conclude that hunting does impose suffering on the quarry, and for that reason is not acceptable as a sport. 24
Put another way, an outright ban was appropriate for that which the Commons sought to remedy – the inherent cruelty of hunting with hounds, which seriously compromised the welfare of all quarry species. This was not a view from which the Commons had been swayed notwithstanding the government’s invoking of notions of ‘least suffering’ or the requirements of conservation. Both the court of first instance and the Court of Appeal were in agreement that ‘once that objection is identified, and is recognised as a legitimate basis for legislation, then a total ban was clearly a proportionate response’. 25

Discussion
From the 1750s, the regulation of hunting with hounds in the UK had stood in marked contrast to the regulation of other animal sports, which had been largely policed out of existence by the late 1800s. Hunting with hounds survived because it was a highly specialised ‘gentlemen’s’ pursuit, governed by conventions that participants strictly adhered to – specifically an ‘honour code’, under which ‘while hunting the fox, gentlemen strictly refrained from pursuing and killing any other animals which came their way…even though it might serve as a most desirable delicacy’. 26 This was ‘killing by proxy’, the actual task being delegated to the hounds and the honour code surrounding the event encompassing the organisation, dress codes, and other paraphernalia as well as extending to the care afforded to horses and hounds both before and after the event.
The effect of this ‘honour code’ distinguishes the contemporary version of hunting with hounds from the earlier manifestations with which the hunting fraternity were keen to claim a historical link in ex p Countryside Commission. 27 In times past, ‘the pleasurable excitement of the hunt had been a kind of fore pleasure experienced in anticipation of the real pleasure – the pleasures of killing and eating’. Foxes, deer, mink and hare were ‘a constant menace to the chicken-run, to the geese and ducks of peasantry and gentry’ and people of all classes enjoyed ‘the pleasure of hunting and killing animals in whatever way they could and ate as many of them as they liked’. 28 The ‘honour code’ of the more recent vintage has served to make a comparatively easy activity – finding a fox and killing it – less straightforward, the sole purpose for the existence of those rules being ‘not because it was felt to be immoral or unfair to kill a fox outright, but because the excitement of the hunt itself had become increasingly the main source of enjoyment for the human participants’. 29 The development and acceptance of these behavioural restraints upon the use of physical force thus reflects a shift towards taking pleasure in seeing violence done rather than in doing it oneself, but this exercise in self-restraint ultimately serves to distinguish those from whom hunting was a source of leisure from those for whom it was a source of food, an economic necessity but one that could attract deportation or the death penalty if it contravened the provisions on poaching. 30
Thus regarded, hunting with hounds has little to distinguish it from illegal animal sports such as cock-fighting, badger-baiting and pig-sticking: the pleasure is in seeing violence done, the putative conservation benefits largely incidental, and its links to ancient history purely mythological. Indeed, as part of its claim under the provisions of European Union free movement law the Countryside Alliance made much of the fact that people travelled from throughout the European Union in order to participate in fox hunting and specialised travel agencies existed to facilitate the same. At no stage did it suggest that those individuals did so in order to assist in a conservation exercise - they did so in order to ride horses and kill foxes and in this aspect the hunting lobby was implicitly acknowledging, contrary to the whole basis of its claim, that the putative livestock conservation benefits of hunting with hounds were purely incidental. The figures bear this out, for fox hunting accounts for less than 10% of the 250,000 fox deaths that occur each year, while in contrast 80,000 are shot and 100,000 are killed on the roads. Furthermore, it costs £70,000 to kill a single fox by hunting it 31, and while most people would accept that fox populations have to be managed, not by any stretch can hunting with hounds be regarded as an efficient or cost-effective exercise in fox population control.
Ex p Countryside Alliance illustrates that considerations of animals’ welfare can fetter human rights: the rights of individuals to engage in whatever leisure pursuits they wish, to utilise their real property in whatever ways they choose, or to enjoy the same lifestyle ad infinitum are not immune to animal welfare considerations. While that was the situation prior to the emergence of a discrete body of human rights jurisprudence, the case further delineates the scope of those restrictions. Although it would certainly be over-stretching the case to assert that animals have ‘rights’ under English law that are in any way analogous to human rights, the recent judicial and legislative history of hunting with hounds illustrates that ‘human rights’ do not afford a license to act with impunity; particularly in the face of other, no less compelling, interests.

1 [2006] EWCA Civ 817, upholding the first instance decision in Countryside Alliance v Attorney General [2005] EWHC 1677.
2 The Scottish executive had already outlawed hunting with hounds in Scotland under the Protection of Wild Animals (Scotland) Act 2002
3 Jackson v Attorney General [2005] 4 All ER 1253.
4 For more on those aspects see Burns, S (2006) ‘When is an Act of Parliament not an Act of Parliament? 156 New Law Journal 191 and Samuels, A (2003) ‘Is the Parliament Act 1949 Valid?’ 24 Statute Law Review 237.
5 Hunting Act 2004, s. 6
6 Hunting Act 2004, Sch. 1. The exemption is available only if the animal is then shot dead as soon as possible after being flushed out: put another way, the animal must not be killed by the dogs that have flushed it out. One of the hunting lobby’s main objections to the legislation is the apparent impossibility of enforcing this provision.
7 Burns, op cit. While the predominance in the legislative chamber’s upper house of unelected, unaccountable, right-wing, public-school educated white men continues to be a source of amazement and amusement to colleagues in other jurisdictions, the author feels obliged, reluctantly, to share on this occasion the opinion of the late and unlamented Enoch Powell MP – namely, that the system history has bequeathed us is no worse than the alternatives.
8 Countryside Alliance v Attorney General [2005] EWHC 1677, paras 31-55.
9 [2006] EWCA Civ 817, at para 17.
10 The Countryside Alliance had argued that the hunting fraternity’s Article 8 claim was analogous to the rights asserted in, inter alia, Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1 (on the putative right of a terminally ill person to end their own life); Peck v United Kingdom (2003) 36 EHRR 41 (privacy rights of an individual caught on camera trying to commit suicide); and Bruggemann v Germany (1981) 3 EHRR 244 (termination of an unwanted pregnancy).
11 [2005] EWHC 1677, at para 120 per May, LJ.
12 [2005] EWHC 1677, at para 135.
13 [2006] EWCA Civ 817, at para 103 per Ld Phillips, MR.
14 [1966] 1 All ER 689, a case arising from the requirement that a female trainer of horses be registered with the Jockey Club under the name of her (male) head stable-boy rather than under her own.
15 (1996) 21 EHRR CD 85
16 [1995] EHHC 1677, at para 128.
17 [2005] EWHC 677, at para 158 per Laws, LJ. See also Anderson v United Kingdom [1998] 25 EHRR, CD 172.
18 [2006] EWCA Civ 817, at para 106.
19 [2006] EWCA Civ 817, at para 107 per Lord Phillips, MR. Emphasis in original.
20 [2005] EWHC 1677, at para 166.
21 In Chassagnou v France (2000) 29 EHRR 615.
22 [2005] EWHC 1677, at para 124 per May, LJ.
23 As outlined in, for example, the Burns Report into Hunting, which was instigated at the behest of the Home Secretary in 1999 and carries a detailed investigation into the scientific and other evidence: http://www.huntinginquiry.gov.uk (last accessed 11th August 2006).
24 2006] EWCA Civ 817, at para 120 per Lord Phillips, MR.
25 [2006] EWCA Civ 817, at para 123 per Lord Phillips, MR.
26 Elias, N and Dunning, E (1986) Quest for Excitement: Sport and Leisure in the Civilising Process (Oxford: Blackwell): 160.
27 [2005] EWHC 1677, at paras 22 - 26
28 Elias and Dunning, op cit: 161.
29 Elias and Dunning, op cit: 166.
30 Thomson, E (1974) ‘The Crime of Anonymity’ in Hay, D et. al Albion’s Fatal Tree (London: Penguin).
31Martin, B (1999) ‘Animal Protection and the Red Fox: Could Licensing Provide an Answer?’ 1(3) Environmental Law Review 196.


Dr David McArdle
School of Law, University of Stirling, Scotland
United Kingdom
d.a.mcardle@stir.ac.uk


Quote - Thierry Henry
 

"Racism is the biggest problem facing football across Europe. People may think it has disappeared, but it hasn't. It's time for us all to take a stand - players, fans and authorities. It's time to stand up and speak up."

Thierry Henry
Professional Football Player, Arsenal



Profile - Stand Up Speak Up

Stand Up Speak Up is a campaign that empowers true football fans to show their opposition to racism.
Following an increase in reports of racists incidents in football across Europe, Arsenal and France striker Theirry Henry joined forced with other top players from across Europe, and with Nike, his sponsor, to create the Stand Up Speak Up campaign to protest against the continuing problem. The campaign has been designed to encourage the 'silent majority' of non-racist fans to speak up against racist abuse in stadiums.
“One of the problems for players when they hear abuse is what to do about it at the time on the pitch. Imagine being abused because of the colour of your skin while trying to do your job. It's difficult to keep your cool on the pitch when you hear this kind of stuff, but if you let it affect you it means the racists have won,” said Henry.
The symbol of the campaign is the black and white wristband. Players and fans have been wearing them to show they support Theirry Henry's campaign and their disgust at racist behavior in stadiums and in the game. All funds resulting from the sale of the wristbands are donated to the Stand Up Speak Up Fund and The King Baudouin Foundation. The Foundation conducts research regarding practices in anti-racism campaigns and projects to ensure that funds are distributed effectively to organizations and projects working against racism in football.
“I am not naïve enough to think the campaign will change everything just like that, but it's obvious that standing by and doing nothing won't change things either,” stated Henry.


Contact:
Ann de Mol
KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION (BELGIUM)
http://www.kbs-frb.be
Rue de Brederodestraat 21
B-1000 Brussels - Belgium
Telephone: + 32 2 511 1840
DEMOL.A@Kbs-frb.be


Profile - Athletes for Human Rights

The Center for the Study of Sport in Society at Northeastern University has developed the Athletes for Human Rights program through its offices in Boston, Massachusetts. The mission of Athletes for Human Rights is to research, educate and advocate human rights in and through sport, focusing on the role of athletes and sport to impact social change locally, nationally and globally.
The vision of Athletes for Human Rights is for the world community to recognize athletes as leaders for social change and sport as a vehicle for promoting human rights. The world community will also value the contributions of athletes and sport in advancing equality and human rights.
"Athletes for Human Rights will be a vehicle for empowering, valuing and respecting the role of athletes and sport in the promotion of human rights and social change," said Peter Roby, director of Sport in Society.
Athletes for Human Rights creates a space for the sporting world to deliberately connect the arena of sport with global affairs. Athletes interested in promoting human rights are offered support and tools to enable them to make a difference through the Athletes for Human Rights program. Athletes and sports leaders will now have a place to learn and understand the potential positive impact of embracing human rights in and through sport. The human rights framework allows athletes across various backgrounds and borders to come together to support and embrace each other.
In February 2006 the School for Human Rights (SHR) and Human Rights Education Associates (HREA) partnered with Sport in Society to host the School for Human Rights (SHR) Olympics focusing on sport and human rights at the school in Brooklyn, New York. The three-day event promoted Olympism as the human rights and social justice philosophy of the Olympic Movement.
"HREA's work at the School for Human Rights is making the human rights framework relevant to all students. Sport in Society helped to develop a new way of presenting Human Rights to students-through sport," said Jessamyn Waldman, HREA program associate and representative at SHR.

Contact:
Athletes for Human Rights
Center for the Study of Sport in Society
Northeastern University
716 Columbus Ave., Suite 161
Boston, MA 02120
Phone: 617-373-4025
Fax: 617-373-4566
Email: sportinsociety@neu.edu
Website: http://www.sportinsociety.org


Activist Athletes and Human Rights: Some Preliminary Research Notes
Peter Kaufman

 

Abstract
Although we generally do not think of athletes as being engaged in the struggle to end human rights abuses, there are numerous examples in the history of sports of athletes using the playing field for political purposes. Across the globe, athletes have joined in the struggle to end such atrocities as racism, sexism, homophobia, ethnic cleansing, war, ableism, environmental destruction and labor abuses. Although most athletes steer clear of political issues and try to remain objective or indifferent, those who do venture into the realm of political discourse make an interesting case study. In an effort to better understand why some athletes feel compelled to mesh the role of athlete with the role of social activist, I have been collecting interviews and gathering media accounts of athletes who engage in social and political activism while in their role as athlete. What follows is a brief discussion of some preliminary findings.

Activist Athletes and Human Rights: Some Preliminary Research Notes
One of the most enduring images in sports within the past one hundred years is that of United States sprinters Tommie Smith and John Carlos on the medal dias for the 200 meter sprint at the 1968 Olympic games in Mexico City, Mexico. Gold-medal winner Smith and bronze-medal winner Carlos stood barefoot on the podium with their fists raised in the infamous Black Power salute. As later recounted by Smith, their gesture was a well-planned symbolic statement: “My raised right hand stood for the power in Black America. Carlos’s raised left hand stood for the unity of Black America. Together they formed an arch of unity and power. The black scarf around my neck stood for Black pride. The black socks with no shoes stood for Black poverty in racist America. The totality of our efforts was the regaining of Black dignity” (Edwards, 1969).
Smith and Carlos were involved with the Olympic Project for Human Rights (OPHR). OPHR was formed by sociologist Harry Edwards to encourage Black athletes to boycott the 1968 Olympic Games in protest of the injustices that Blacks experienced in the United States. When the boycott fell through, athletes decided upon their own personal protests of which Smith and Carlos’ is by far the most well known.
Although the symbolic, non-violent protest of Smith and Carlos is one of the most famous examples of athletic activism, it is by no means the only one. Sports history is filled with examples of athletes using the playing field as a medium to publicize violations in human rights. Issues such as racism, sexism, homophobia, ethnic cleansing, war, ableism, environmental destruction and labor abuses have been touted by athletes across the globe in an effort to have such abuses eradicated. While most athletes do not engage in social and political activism, it is interesting to consider why some athletes do feel compelled to mesh the role of athlete with the role of social activist. In an effort to address this issue, I have been collecting interviews and gathering media accounts of athletes who engage in social and political activism while in their role as athlete. This article will offer some preliminary findings of my research.
Sport sociologist Stanley Eitzen (1999) suggests that individuals who engage in sport are no more likely to develop positive social values such as good citizenship than their non-athletic peers. However, some athletes have been able to “walk in the shoes of others” and recognize that they are not, nor should they be, unaffected by the suffering of strangers. For Kevin McMahon, a two-time U.S. Olympian and national champion in the hammer throw, this attitude of connectedness with others became particularly salient when he realized he was benefiting directly from the unjust working conditions of Third World laborers. For McMahon, the issue was the sweatshop labor that produced the clothes he used to wear so proudly. One day while driving home from practice he was listening to a radio program and the host was doing a show about human rights violations in the Central American sweatshops that manufacture NBA jerseys. In an interview, he shared how he was particularly bothered by the report when he realized these “people are doing honest work and they’re being exploited.” He then began to think about his own involvement in this situation: “And then it really hit home that, wait a minute, I might not be an NBA basketball player, but I do have a form in my life when I walk out with logos all over me and it made me really look at that for the very first time.” The more he thought about it, the more powerful the issue became, and in his interview he continued:
It was a real difficult time for my conscience because I previously had no qualms wearing Reebok or Adidas or whatever. I’m an athlete, so it was cool that that’s what you were wearing. And it was free. Why wouldn’t you wear it? But it nearly sickened me to think that for those however many years I was advertising for these people. That I was promoting their stuff. That I, in my ignorance, had possibly caused harm to these people that are just being exploited. And I think there was that sense of guilt and that sense of responsibility. If you just look at the countries that they’ve [the sportswear companies] hopped from one to the other, it’s a who’s who of countries that really desperately need jobs, desperately need money and they take advantage of that. And it’s great that they give them jobs but they could treat them more like human beings.

In sociological terms, McMahon was being reflexive–he was recognizing the inherent biases in his own actions and, subsequently, how these actions were detrimental to the lives of others. Major League Baseball’s Carlos Delgado provides a similar example. In 2004, Delgado was an All Star baseball player for the Toronto Blue Jays when he protested the United States invasion of Iraq by not standing for the playing of “God Bless America” during the seventh inning of every baseball game. Delgado’s decision to be one of the only professional athletes in a major North American sport to protest the war in Iraq is “rooted in his native Puerto Rico, where for six decades the US Navy tested myriad weapons by bombing the small island of Vieques off the country’s eastern coast” (Pollak, 2004, p. 12). After one of these bombs killed a civilian in 1999, Delgado got involved in the protest movement to stop the United States Navy bombings on Vieques (which was finally ended in May 2003). For Delgado, the decision to become an activist not only grew out of his social relationships but also his cultural milieu. Like Kevin McMahon, Carlos Delgado does not see his role as an athlete as being mutually exclusive from his role as activist. In fact, both athletes used their connection to sport to bolster and justify their argument for becoming an activist and fighting against what they perceive to be abuses in human rights.
One of the most famous protests against human rights abuses occurred when Muhammad Ali refused induction into the United States Army during the Vietnam War. At the time, Ali was the heavyweight boxing champion of the world but his deep religious beliefs gave him the conviction to refuse the draft and protest the human rights abuses occurring in Southeast Asia. In defending his decision not to be inducted, Ali stated eloquently:
Why should they ask me to put on a uniform and go 10,000 miles from home and drop bombs and bullets on Brown people in Vietnam while so-called Negro people in Louisville are treated like dogs and denied simple human rights? No I’m not going 10,000 miles from home to help murder and burn another poor nation simply to continue the domination of white slave masters of the darker people the world over. This is the day when such evils must come to an end. I have been warned that to take such a stand would cost me millions of dollars. But I have said it once and I will say it again. The real enemy of my people is here. I will not disgrace my religion, my people or myself by becoming a tool to enslave those who are fighting for their own justice, freedom and equality. If I thought the war was going to bring freedom and equality to 22 million of my people they wouldn’t have to draft me, I’d join tomorrow. I have nothing to lose by standing up for my beliefs. So I’ll go to jail, so what? We’ve been in jail for 400 years (quoted in Marqusee, 1999, pp. 214-5).

That there are indeed athletes who become activists is somewhat fascinating especially given the culture of sports, particularly in the United States. The phenomena of the activist athletes, no matter how small their number, begs the question of how and why they became activists. Why anyone becomes an activists and attempts to “make history” (Flacks 1988) is a question that has intrigued sociologists, particularly those who study social movements and social change (McAdam 1986, 1988; Snow, Zurcher & Ekland-Olson, 1986). Much of this work employed ideas from network analysis to explain the process through which an individual assumes the personal and social identity of an activist. In this framework, it is not so much the character traits of individuals but rather, the social interactions in which they find themselves. Emirbayer and Goodwin (1994) point out that social behavior does not arise from individuals’ norms and attributes nor does it arise from the categories in which people find themselves (or place themselves); rather, social behavior arises from their involvement in structured social relations: “One can never simply appeal to such attributes as class membership or class consciousness, political party affiliation, age, gender, social status, religious beliefs, ethnicity, sexual orientation, psychological predispositions, and so on, in order to explain why people behave the way they do” (pp. 1414-5). Instead, we need to focus on their patterns of relationships.
The importance of social relationships for cultivating an activist’s identity is clearly evident in the athletes I have interviewed. When asked to recount how they developed their activist consciousness, many of these athletes point to family members, coaches and friends as their guiding influence. For example, consider the case of Toni Smith, the young woman from the United States who found herself in a firestorm of world-wide media attention when she turned her back to the flag before her Manhattanville College basketball games. For Toni, the structured social relations that led her to activism can be traced to her family and her peers:
“Both my grandmothers were very active. On one side she was very active in forming unions and workers’ rights. My grandmother on the other side was also kind of fighting for the same things during that time. And my mother and my parents are very active in the Civil Rights Movement, Vietnam War protests, also unionizing people and workers’ rights. So I remember going to marches and events when I was younger although I didn’t fully know the significance. Like I remember going to a lot of anti apartheid movements and UFT [United Federation of Teachers] marches and stuff. [In college] I became very, very aware my first semesters. I also met a few people who were in my classes who were already very politically active and I went to events with them. And that combined with my family who has always been political, and I think they were kind of waiting for me to bust out of my shell or be political or show some signs of promise”.

Although many activist athletes seem to fit the model put forth by the network theorists that activism arises out of the interactional context in which one finds oneself, there is still something distinctive about their situation. Unlike most other activists whose actions not only emanate from their social relations but also transpire within the company of these social relations, the activist athlete is often acting alone. The group that influenced and inspired their actions is usually (and literally) sitting on the sidelines. Most activists have the luxury, if we can call it that, of exerting their agency in the supportive community of others. For such activists, like the Freedom Riders that McAdam (1988) studied, social relationships not only cultivated their activist orientation but such relationships also served as the socially interactive content and context through which their actions occurred. However, the activist athlete must be prepared to stand alone and bear the brunt of the attention. Although activist athletes may have a network of supporters, these supporters are usually not fellow athletes and are therefore relegated to a backstage location. When an athlete makes a political statement on the playing field, she or he is often unaccompanied during the protest and consequently the reactions to the activism are aimed directly at the athlete. This “spotlight effect” may be a significant detriment to athletic activism and is one of the reasons why so few athletes assume the role of activist.

Conclusion
The athletes I am studying have engaged in social action to address human rights abuses across the globe. Hopefully, other athletes will heed their stories and follow their examples. Critics of activist athletes often argue that athletes should play not pontificate and that the playing field is no place for political protests. But how are athletes different than business people, doctors and office workers? And how is the playing field any different than the board room, the office or the town square? No single group should be excluded from engaging in thoughtful political and social discourse nor should any group have a monopoly on such issues. This point was suggested to me in an interview with Bradley Saul, a former professional cyclist and founder of Organic Athletes, an organization dedicated to using sport to foster social change: “As citizens, we have an obligation to be informed. [And] one does have an obligation to be aware of injustices and to do something about them in whatever capacity. And if you’re an athlete well then you can do it through the tools you have as an athlete.”
Sport in contemporary society has tremendous national and international consequences. Socially, politically, economically and culturally, it is hard to identify another social institution (with the exception of religion) that has such a wide scope of influence. In this context, athletes should not only be allowed to express themselves, they should be encouraged to do so. As members of the global community, we should expect athletes to be informed, concerned and proactive. Moreover, we should not be so naive to believe that sport and politics do not mix. Once asked to speak about the intersection of religion and politics, Mahatma Gandhi said, “Those who say that religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion means” (Gandhi, 1957). I think we can learn from this insight and say the same about athletics: Those who say that sport has nothing to do with politics do not know what sport means.

References
Eitzen, S. D. (1999). Fair and foul: Beyond the myths and paradoxes of sport. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Edwards, H. (1969). The revolt of the black athlete. New York: Free Press.
Emirbayer, M. & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411-1454.
Flacks, R. (1988). Making history: The American left and the American mind. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gandhi, M. (1957). An autobiography. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marqusee, M. (1999). Redemption song: Muhammad Ali and the spirit of the sixties. New York, NY: Verso.
McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64-90.
McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pollak, R. (2004). Patriot at the bat. The Nation, September 13, 2004.
Snow, D. A., L. A. Zurcher, Jr., & S. Ekland-Olson. (1980). Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment.” American Sociological Review, 45,787-801.


Contact:
Dr. Peter Kaufman
State University of New York at New Paltz
New Paltz, New York
USA
kaufmanp@newpaltz.edu



Profile - Recognition for Tommie Smith, John Carlos and the Olympic Project for Human Rights
Ken Noel

 
The author thanks Gene Zubrinsky of Ojai, Calif., for editorial assistance.

The Olympic Project for Human Rights (O.P.H.R.), a movement for social equality and human rights, arose out of black student activism at San Jose State College in 1967. Within its short history as an active organization (1967–1968), the O.P.H.R. significantly impacted the prevailing, naive view of sport as detached from politics—a bastion of brotherhood, social harmony and understanding, where what counts is not the color of one’s skin but only how well one plays the game. In orchestrating black athletes’ well-publicized protests against social injustice, the O.P.H.R. was an integral part of the mid-twentieth-century struggle for human rights. Goals such as “[c]urtailment of participation of all-white teams and individuals from the apartheid Union of South Africa and Southern Rhodesia in all United States and Olympic events” were paramount (Edwards, 1969, pp. 58–59).
O.P.H.R. veterans have followed with interest two recent projects with sport-and-politics themes that could rekindle efforts to promote human rights by exploiting that connection.
One is a project at San Jose State University involving the erection of a statue of Tommie Smith and John Carlos of the O.P.H.R., with raised gloved fists, on the victory stand at the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City. The other is the History San José organization’s “Speed City: Roots and Legacy” project, an outgrowth of the scholarship and dedication of doctoral candidate Urla Hill. Both recall significant organizations, activities and events at San Jose State that connect sport and politics. These efforts to promote social reform on a national and international level are important in the history of San Jose State University and the City of San Jose.
There is little disagreement that the Smith–Carlos victory-stand salute highlighted for the world the importance of taking a stand against social injustice. San Jose State University and the City of San Jose’s honoring of these athletes’ courage and sacrifice helps revive interest in a global problem, in part by giving these men new opportunities to publicly reiterate O.P.H.R. themes. (The organization’s philosophy and goals are expressed in the concluding statement of the 1968 National Conference on Black Power, in Philadelphia [see Edwards, 1969, pp. 179–180].)
While not as widely publicized as the statue honoring Smith and Carlos, the “Speed City: Roots and Legacy” project is having the same effect in bringing renewed attention to them, among others, and to the Olympic Project for Human Rights. The name Speed City derives from the high concentration of world-class black sprinters in San Jose in the mid-1960s, many but not all of whom ran for San Jose State. They are said to have been drawn there by the college’s long and rich history of cultivating top, mostly black, sprinters. At a presentation of “Speed City” sponsored by Barnes & Noble Booksellers and History San José (attended and videotaped by the author) the panelists spoke of pioneering the rise of judo as an Olympic sport and breakthroughs in sprinting that led to world records. Eloquently explaining the trials and tribulations of surviving in the face of widespread racial discrimination, they won nods of agreement and empathy from the audience. Over all, the large and receptive audience seemed old enough to have attended college during the era of student protests. Their comments implied they saw the black student movement of 1967–1968 clearly and understood the flow of events, for the first time.
Later this year, an exhibit entitled “Speed City: From Civil Rights to Black Power” is scheduled for presentation at the History San José facility. It is a collection of sports memorabilia and information contributed by coaches, athletes and the university. Plans for the collection to tour the country include various athletes presenting the history and promoting education, equality and the struggle for human rights.
Much work lies ahead for all who are willing. Projects like the Smith–Carlos statue and “Speed City: Roots and Legacy” are timely developments that may help sensitize us to the persistence of social inequality and reignite the struggle against it. This discussion and the projects mentioned herein signal opportunities of joining together for common goals. Leading up to the 2008 Olympic Games and the 40th anniversary of the victory-stand demonstration, it is high time for collaborating with those who are committed to making the most of the current interest in the connection of sport and politics on a national and international level.

References
Edwards, H. (1969). The revolt of the Black athlete. New York, NY: Free Press.


Contact
Ken Noel
Olympic Project for Human Rights
USA
Noel_ken@sbcglobal.net


Quote - Anita DeFrantz
 

"I believe that sport is a birthright. Other animals may play or learn to fight to protect their territory, but we are the only species that takes part in sport. I believe this is because sport requires a high level of thought. This is necessary to direct the body through the dimensions of time and space, which all sport requires. Sports belong to us all.
Opportunity to take part in sport is a measure of human rights. There have been vicious acts of retaliation for taking part in sport. Exclusion from sport based on sex, skin color, economic or political statuses are all indicators that a society has failed in providing human rights. It means that people have been denied access to a birthright."

Anita DeFrantz
Amateur Athletic Foundation
International Olympic Committee

Current Issues

European College of Sport Science Symposium

Environmental Aspects of the Olympic Games –
an Interdisciplinary Approach
At the 2004 Pre-Olympic Congress
“Sports Science Through the Ages”: Challenges to the New Millennium.
6-11 August, Thessaloniki, Greece

Thomas Reilly

 

The environment of the Olympic Games: An Introduction
Abstract
Environmental factors can have an impact on performance in major sports tournaments. The history of the modern Olympic Games illustrates how environmental aspects influence the outcomes. Such factors have included air quality (St Louis), pollution (Los Angeles), altitude (Mexico), heat (Rome), for example. Travel schedules and jet-lag syndrome were considerations for most nations competing in Sydney 2000, due to the disharmony between local time and “body clock time” after arrival in Australia. Acknowledging the potential for degrading competitive performance, many competitors prepare coping strategies by acclimatisation, acclimation or behavioural means. Weather conditions are unpredictable well in advance and can deviate substantially from average climatic data. Air ions and electric storms may have differential effects on competitors and spectators. Contemporary athletes use projections for Athens 2004, targeting heat and pollution as potential stressors. A range of pollutants is also relevant to consider for Beijing, 2008. Ecological issues have influence also, notably in the legacy left behind for host cities.
Key words: Air quality, altitude, heat, pollution, weather.

An Interdisciplinary Approach
Environmental factors have been relevant considerations in the modern Olympic Games since the reinstallation of the Summer Olympics in 1896. Physiological stressors have featured most prominently according to climatic and local conditions. The history of the Olympic Games is marked by examples of how performances are influenced by environmental variables. In the events of the first half of the 20th Century, little was done to take possible environmental extremes of heat into consideration when planning the competitive schedule (4).
The modern Olympics have grown in scale as well as appeal. Hosting the Games affords huge benefits for the organising nation, usually acquiring a legacy of resources and facilities (and sometimes debt) for its own community. The venues and installations change the local landscape in a way not otherwise possible. The local infrastructure is transformed in a major way to represent a huge economic investment for the future. The global appeal of the Games raises its own pressures for related commercial applications. Inevitably, there is a question about the Summer Olympics (and Paralympic Games) as to whether its scale has outstripped its ideals.
These considerations provide a background for treating environmental issues in an interdisciplinary framework. The environment is interpreted liberally for this purpose. Broad ecological questions may be raised alongside known effects on athletes interacting with the Olympic environment. In order to demonstrate the relevance of discrete environmental stresses, some examples are first given from previous Games. These include heat, altitude, travel stress and air pollution.

Heat
It is clear that performance in events that entail high heat storage may be degraded in hot conditions. Stresses are accentuated when high relative humidity impairs evaporative heat loss. A radiant heat load may further accentuate the strain on the athlete.
There are may instances of torrid conditions prevailing at the Olympic Games, most notably in the men’s marathon. The event at Paris in 1900 has been described as the “hottest Olympic marathon in history” (3). Race-time temperature was reported as between 35ºC and 39ºC. The extremely hot spell was a continuation of what had been a very warm summer throughout France that year. Of the 16 starters, only seven finished the course which at this time was over a distance of 40.26 km.
There have been later instances of heat influencing performance of Olympic competitors. Acknowledging the potential for negative impact on performance, many athletes prepare coping strategies by using warm-weather camps to gain the benefits of physiological acclimatisation. Such benefits may also be acquired by periodic use of environmental chambers for simulating hot conditions, the process being referred to as acclimation (5). There is also something to be gained from experiencing the hot conditions (even if there is insufficient exposure time for physiological acclimatisation) so that the athlete may devise a strategy to cope in competition.
Projections for climatic conditions utilise meteorological databases which may differ in detail from the competitive locations. Weather conditions are inherently variable, are not highly predictable well in advance and can at any time vary from the average climatic data provided by meteorological sources. Nevertheless, sports science support programmes utilise climatic data to prepare their athletes for exercise in the heat. It is likely that the vast majority of competitors at the 2004 Olympic Games will have benefited from sport-specific advice about how the environment in Athens might impact upon their performance.

Altitude
Altitude is a common feature of the Winter Olympics, the winter sports being associated with mountainous environments. The single instance of altitude stress at the Summer Olympics was in Mexico, 1968. The results from the Games demonstrated how performances in events largely dependent on the oxygen transport system were impaired. In contract, the reduced air density at altitude helped to enhance performance in sprint races of up to an including 400 m and in the horizontal jumps (see Table 1).
All medallists in track-and-field at the Mexico Olympics in events over 800 m and longer were either born or had trained at altitude. Subsequently attention shifted from how to cope with competing at altitude to exploiting the physiological adaptations to altitude in order to aid performance at sea level. This change in emphasis has led to the widespread use of altitude training camps in preparation for major tournaments. The practice is now adopted across a range of sports including swimming and rowing as well as running and cycling.
The use of altitude as a training stimulus has been extended to incorporate altitude chambers located at sea-level. These may be the so-called “altitude huts” or normobaric hypoxic chambers. Commercially available mobile simulators alter the inspired oxygen tension to allow exercise hypoxia to be experienced. Another resource is represented by the hypoxic tents which allow the athlete to sleep in an enclosed environment with reduced partial pressure of the oxygen being breathed in. This places emphasis on habitual activity and living at altitude rather than training in it. In view of the fact that the absolute exercise intensity is usually reduced at altitude, an alternative strategy that is advocated for athletes is to live for sojourns at altitude but return periodically to lower levels in order to maintain the quality of training (2).

Travel
Contemporary elite sport entails frequent travel, often over long durations and distances. Indeed competing on a global basis and inter-continental travel are lifestyle features of top performers. Major tournaments are dispersed throughout the world so that the personal attraction of visiting foreign countries is often tempered by the disruption and inconvenience associated with the trip.
Recent Olympic Games have forced European athletes in particular to consider their itineraries carefully. The summer Olympics of 1996 entailed travel across multiple time-zones westward whereas the Sydney Games required a greater displacement in an easterly direction. The Winter Olympics in Nagano 1998 and Salt Lake City in 2002 also highlighted the need for the European national teams to possess a travel strategy. A similar situation prevails for European countries competing in Beijing 2008, or travelling to China beforehand for the purpose of a “dry run”.
Travel strategies separate the hassle of travel and associated travel fatigue from the desynchronisation of the body clock due to the mismatch between the new local time and the body’s circadian rhythm. The disruption is characterised by the syndrome of jet-lag (6). Whilst the body clock is readjusting gradually to the new time zone, performance can be affected. Pharmacological means of accelerating the adjustment have proved to be less effective in athletes than have behavioural methods (1). Exercise and training can play a role but lifestyle factors are critical.

Air Quality
A concern in urban areas is the quality of the air the inhabitants breathe in. The level of pollution has been a consideration at Olympic Games venues in the past, notably Mexico in 1968 and Los Angeles in 1984. Yet evidence of air quality affecting competitors is available from the Summer Olympics 100 years ago.
The marathon course at St. Louis in 1904 was held over a rural road surface. The runners were preceded by the new generation of motor cars, scattered haphazardly amongst them (3). The clouds of dust generated by the cars practically suffocated the runners moving in their wake. Such lack of concern for the athletes was characteristic of sports spectacles at this time.
Many teams visiting Athens before the 2004 Games have been able to acquire their own data close to competitive venues for the concentration of atmospheric pollutants. Athens is built on a basin, surrounded on three sides by mountains and open to the sea. The topology and industry in the basin and surrounding plains result in very high pollution levels. The 90th percentile values shown in Table 1 demonstrate how Athens is inferior to London for a range of environmental pollutants. These include ozone, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10s) and black smoke. The likelihood of vulnerable individuals such as asthmatics being adversely affected in the environment of Athens has been an issue with medical staff of competing teams.
The vagaries of climate place some sports at risk from the weather. Swimming in open pools is halted in electrical storms. Wind conditions may also prevent some sports being held or at least disrupt performance. The Meltini wind funnels down from the Balkan mountains over Athens when there is a thermal low over nearby Turkey. Sailors, triathlon swimmers and rowers must learn how to deal with it, as must the archers.

Overview
The global appeal of the Summer Olympics has never been more marked. It is estimated that four billion people will have watched the Games being transmitted on television. During the 16 days of competition, the attention of the international media is focused on Athens and the Olympic Games.
Individual environmental factors will be dealt with as they arise by participants, prepared in advance with sports-specific support programmes. In many cases, support staff as well as competitors are exposed to environmental influences and must also be ready to cope. There are then more telling questions to be addressed with respect to the context of the Games overall. These embrace elements of legacy and economics, culture and philosophy, materialism and ecology. In the changing milieu, it is appropriate to consider again the relevance of the Olympic ideals to the contemporary environment.

References
(1) Atkinson, G., Drust, B., Reilly, T. and Waterhouse, J. (2003). The relevance of melatonin to sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine, 33, 809-831.
(2) Levine, B. (1995). Training and exercise at high altitudes. In: Sport, Leisure and Ergonomics, pp. 74-92. London: E. and F.N. Spon.
(3) Martin, D.E. and Gynn, R.W.H. (2000). The Olympic Marathon: The History and Drama of Sport’s Most Challenging Event. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics.
(4) Peiser, B. and Reilly, T. (2004). Environmental factors in the Summer Olympics in historical perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22 (in press).
(5) Reilly, T. and Waterhouse, J. (2005). Sport, Exercise and Environmental Physiology. Edinburgh: Elsevier.
(6) Waterhouse, J., Reilly, T. and Atkinson, G. (1997). Jet lag. Lancet, 350, 1611-1615.

Table 1. Winners of men’s event in track and field: Mexico Olympics

Table 2. A comparison of environmental pollutants in Athens and London. Data presented are 90th percentile values in parts per million.


Heat
Bengt Saltin
The Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre
University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen
Denmark

Abstract
Hot conditions impose strain on the cardiovascular system, which is accentuated by dehydration. With reductions in cardiac output to the active muscles, performance is adversely affected. Exhaustion seems to occur at a common body temperature, implicating a thermoregulatory limiting factor. Attention is shifted to mechanisms within the brain that are associated with the exhausted state.

Key words
Dehydration, maximal oxygen uptake, pre-cooling, skin temperature

The basic issues
Intense exercise in the heat implicates three basic issues:-
  1. Exercise generates heat amounting to about 80% of the energy turnover.
  2. The transport of this heat from the body’s core to its skin puts an extra demand on the cardiovascular system.
  3. There is need to maintain skin temperature as low as possible, via sweating and the consequent disturbed water/electrolyte balance.
Exercise for 120 min at 70-75% O2 max induces the same skin temperature as exercise at 80-85% O2 max. Both muscle temperature and core temperature are increased as a function of the higher exercise intensity.
Skin temperature is influenced by the ambient air temperature rather than by exercise. The rise in skin temperature is steeper for rest compared with exercise as the air temperature increases.
The responses of skin and core temperatures for different environments are shown in Table 1. At 40oC the normal gradient from the body to the environment is reversed as the ambient temperature exceeds body temperature.
The consequence of a high skin temperature when exercising at 85-90% O2 max is that the difference between core and skin temperatures decreases with elevations in ambient temperature. A gradient of 7.5oC at 20oC is reduced to 5oC at 30oC, 2.5oC at 35oC and 0-0.5oC at 40oC. Skin blood flow increases correspondingly from 3-4 l.min-1, 5-6 l.min-1, 7-8 l.min-1 and maybe > 8 l.min-1.
The rise in core temperature is reduced during a 9-day period of acclimatization. The sweat rate is increased and at 35oC the rate of sweat loss may approach 3 l.h-1.
Two questions follow:
  1. Can the athlete drink as much as is lost?
  2. What are the bodily effects of an accumulated dehydration?
The maximal fluid intake is in the range 1-1.5 l.h-1, slightly more in exceptional cases. This means a deficit is likely to occur. This deficit increases the rate of rise in body temperature and adds to the cardiovascular strain.
The bodily effects are complex and involve haemodynamics, fuel supply to the active muscle and brain mechanisms. In many cases dehydration is combined with heat stress so thermoregulatory limits to exercise performance may prevail.

Effects on performance
A rise in body temperature will contribute to a reduction in the level of performance and cause fatigue. A water-perfused jacket can alter the rate of rise in body temperature from 0.10 to 0.05oC.min-1.
The rate of increase in body temperature is illustrated in Figure 1 for two different air temperatures (3). Performance of high-intensity exercise was terminated earlier at the high temperature, the final muscle temperature being similar for the two conditions.
Hyperthermia also causes a reduction in cardiac output. As oesophogeal temperature increases, there is a corresponding increase in heart rate and a reduction in stroke volume. Besides affecting cardiovascular haemodynamics, hyperthermia and dehydration influence oxygen and fuel delivery to active skeletal muscle and their utilization by active muscle.
The effects of dehydration were isolated in the study of Gonzalez-Alonso et al. (1). The environmental conditions were 35oC and 40% relative humidity. The power output of 210 W represented 60% O2 max. Two trials were compared:-
  1. Progressive dehydration until fatigue;
  2. Euhydration with the same exercise duration.
Cardiac output was maintained with euhydration, as was mean arterial blood pressure (Figure 2a), in contrast to the falls occurring with dehydration. The drop in cardiac output with dehydration affected the distribution of blood to different tissues (Figure 2b). Blood flow to the legs was reduced relative to euhydration, as were blood flow to other tissues and forearm blood flow.
The decreased leg blood flow does not impair the delivery of the required oxygen, glucose and FFA, or the removal of lactate. Leg O2 , glucose uptake and FFA uptake are not drastically altered. Skeletal muscle glycogen utilization, lactate production and PCr degradation are elevated with dehydration (see Figure 3).

Exhaustion
The exercise time to exhaustion seems to depend on the core temperature reached. Observations on 10 subjects displayed a range from 40-70 min for time to exhaustion. A feature of the data was that there was a common core temperature around 40.5oC at the termination of exercise.
Brain temperature and metabolism may be linked with the process of fatigue and eventual exhaustion (see Figure 4). Exercise hyperthermia causes brain temperature to rise. Corresponding increases in a/ß waves lead to decreases in arousal and voluntary activation (Figure 5). Perceived exertion is elevated and fatigue is promoted.
Brain oxygen extraction increases during high-intensity exercise to fatigue. The a-vO2
difference reaches a similar level in hyperthermia compared to normal conditions but fatigue occurs earlier (Figure 6). A similar pattern is evident in oxygen extraction across exercising legs.
After exercise, there is an increase in brain O2. Both a-vO2 difference and global brain O2 are elevated in heat stress compared to normal conditions (Figure 7). In contrast to the exercising legs, the brain possesses a large oxygen reserve at the point of exhaustion which appears to secure the brain against reductions in systemic delivery of oxygen (4).

Adjusting body temperature
Body temperature may be altered experimentally by pre-cooling or pre-heating. Immersion in water at 18oC was compared to responses to 37oC and 41oC. Air temperature was 40oC and exercise at 240 W corresponded to 60% O2 max (3).
Exhaustion occurred at the same oesophogeal temperature and the same muscle temperature in each condition. Mean skin temperature on termination of exercise did not differ between conditions. Performance was reduced in time by about 20 min with pre-heating and extended by about the same time with pre-cooling (Figure 8).
Is fatigue due to insufficient skeletal muscle ATP production? Data from Gonzalez-Alonso et al. (2) indicate that stores of PCr and ATP are still adequate when fatigue occurs with dehydration (see Figure 9).
Muscle, oesophogeal and femoral blood temperatures stabilize during sustained exercise or show a small increase when subjects are euhydrated. This trend contrasts with dehydration, where all these temperatures continue to increase. Hyperthermia, whether subjects are euhydrated or dehydrated, induces the highest oesophogeal and skin temperatures (5). Performance is extended when dehydrated if ambient temperature is normal, and prolonged further in euhydration-normal compared to exercising in heat (see Figure 10).
Heart rate is increased with hyperthermia, whether euhydrated or dehydrated. There is a corresponding reduction in oxygen uptake at maximal exercise. Heat stress clearly impairs O2 max and has consequences for performance. These findings support the view that fatigue during maximal exercise is largely associated with the failure of the heart to maintain cardiac output and the delivery of oxygen to the skeletal muscle.

References
  1. Gonzalez-Alonso, J., Calbet, J.A.L. and Nielsen, B. (1998). Muscle blood flow is reduced with dehydration during prolonged exercise in humans. Journal of Physiology, 513, 895-905.
  2. Gonzalez-Alonso, J., Calbet, J.A.L. and Nielsen, B. (1999a). Metabolic and thermodynamic responses to dehydration-induced reductions in muscle blood flow in exercising humans. Journal of Physiology, 520-577-589.
  3. Gonzalez-Alonso, J., Teller, C., Andersen, S.L., Jensen, F.B., Hyldig, T. and Nielsen, B. (1999b). Influence of body temperature on the development of fatigue during prolonged exercise in the heat. Journal of Applied Physiology, 86, 1032-1039.
  4. Nybo, L. and Nielsen, B. (2001). Middle cerebral artery velocity is reduced with hyperthermia during prolonged exercise in humans. Journal of Physiology, 534, Part 1, 279-286.
  5. Nybo, L., Jensen, T., Nielsen, B. and Gonzales-Alonso, J. (2001). Effects of marked hyperthermia with and without dehydration on O2 kinetics during intense exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 90, 1057-1064.


Table 1. Responses of skin and core temperature for different environments. Values are in o C



Figure 1. Rate of increase in body temperature for different air temperatures.


Figure 2. Cardiac output, mean arterial pressure (2a) and blood distribution (2b) during euhydration and dehydration.

Figure 3. Muscle glycogen utilization and lactate production due to dehydration.
Figure 4. Brain temperature at exhaustion.

Figure 5. Schematic model of fatigue during exercise in the heat.

Figure 6. Arterio-venous oxygen difference across the brain in dehydration.

Figure 7. Global brain oxygen uptake during dehydration.

Figure 8. Effects of pre-cooling and pre-heating on exercise performance.

Figure 9. Stores of PCr and ATP at the point of fatigue during dehydration.

Figure 10. Performance during exercise in the heat.






The Use of Altitude Training – Possible Reasons for
Benefit and Failures
Ulrich Hartmann
Technical University of Munich
Faculty of Sport Science
Department for Theory and Practice in Sport
Munich
Germany

Abstract
Training at moderate high altitude (HA; 1800 to 2400 m) is one of the few possibilities available to increase the performance more than by the normally given circumstances. To estimate the positive (or negative) effects of training at HA, personal experiences from the point of view of a direct monitoring of training play an important role. Besides the general difficulties of estimating the (positive/negative) effect of training at HA, only few objective data from training practice with top class athletes are available. The effect of training at HA with the goal to improve performance capacity in endurance sports is still under discussion in the sports sciences [2, 3].
In discussing positive or negative effects of high altitude, we have to separate out: 1. General effects of adaptation during or after exposure to high altitude, which give an unspecific benefit. 2. Positive (or negative) training effects which can be similar during training at high altitude or at sea level; additional to this outcome, the training at high altitude can be influenced in a positive (or negative) way. 3. Effects and benefits of training which can be caused only by a stay under high altitude conditions. In most of the studies no differentiation has been made between these aspects, which makes it difficult to interpret under isolated points of view the benefits and / or failures of a stay under HA conditions. Besides these facts, there is the problem of interpreting those effects of a continuous stay versus a regular intermittent hypoxic exposure (LH – TL: Live high, train low; LL – TH; live low, train high) or even more so the effects of several new altitude training strategies like a) normobaric hypoxia via nitrogen dilution (nitrogen apartment), b) supplemental oxygen, c) hypoxic sleeping devices, and d) short-term intermittent hypoxic exposure.
Under general aspects, it should be helpful to outline the benefits of a permanent stay at HA under the aspects of an individual positive-responding athlete. According to these results, an increase of the total blood volume (BV) and a higher capacity for the transport of oxygen can be anticipated [1, 4, 5, 6]. The consequences of this effect can be interpreted by means of an approximation equation. Besides that, the maturation of the reticulocytes (RET) and their increase show a great individual variability (between 10% and 250%); the intra-individual variation in a later study (40% compared to 150% in one athlete) has probably a great influence for the individual increase in BV. The increase in BV is the basis for a positive development of performance during and after a training period at HA.
Therefore a calculation can be provided, focusing on the resulting effect of a higher transportation capacity which is caused by an increase of red blood cells in combination with a higher BV. As long as those effects are generating a systematic benefit in athletes responding positively (e.g. in many members of an elite rowing team) this seems to be at least an indication of a positive aspect of a prolonged or permanent stay at HA. For an intermittent stay or for the other new altitude training strategies (see above), consistent evidence cannot be shown as regular effects in top athletes.
Another influencing and probably the most important factor with regard to the benefit of a stay under hypoxic conditions is the stress presented to the muscle cell, possibly yielding a misleading adaptation of the muscle cell by an (inadequate) load of the training content. Therefore it should be necessary to focus more on individual aspects of the average volume and intensity in the total amount of training of athletes in middle-distance sport events [2]. Referring to our own findings, the intensities during a HA-training camp were significantly different. In particular, a medium to high intensive training (“speed training”) often did not lead to the anticipated long-term training effect or decreased the power output over a given period of time. Although dominant and solely not a specific problem under HA conditions, it seems to be one of the general problems of muscular mal-adaptation which can be negatively fortified under HA conditions, theoretically independent of which altitude training strategies have been chosen. It includes consideration of the actual subjective perceptions and their biological influences on the sport practitioner and incorporation of the traditional points of view (e.g. for periodization).

References
[1]. Ekblom et al. (1972): J. Appl. Physiol. 33, 175-180
[2]. Hartmann & Mader (1999): In: Zeitschrift für Angewandte Trainingswissenschaft (ed), 6, 1, 72–105
[3]. Levine & Stray-Gunderson (1997): J. Appl. Physiol. 83, 102-112
[4]. Luft U. (1941): Ergebn. Physiol. 44, 256-312
[5]. Rost et al. (1975): Sportarzt und Sportmedizin 26, 137-144
[6]. Williams at al. (1973): Med. and Science in Sports 5, 181-186




The lifestyle of current elite athletes: coping with jet lag
Benjamin J Edwards
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences
Liverpool John Moores University
Henry Cotton Building
15-21 Webster St
Liverpool
L2 3ET
UK


Abstract
International travel is an essential part of the lives of elite athletes, both for purposes of competition and training. Long-haul flights entail crossing multiple time zones, and this causes jet lag, due to disruption of the normal circadian rhythm. Various pharmacological and behavioural approaches have been used to reduce some of the effects of jet lag in sports performers. This overview focuses on strategies used for the Sydney summer Olympics 2000 (10 time zones to the east from the UK), and looks forward to the Beijing 2008 Olympics (8 time zones to the east from the UK). Travel fatigue lasts for only a day or so, is associated with the conditions of the journey (such as the cramped nature of the seating), anxiety about travel, and disruption to the individual’s daily routine and can be separated from the jet lag phenomenon. For those who fly across multiple time zones the effects associated with jet lag are longer lasting, and can reduce motivation to train effectively and impact negatively on performance. The severity and duration of these problems depend on the direction of flight (eastwards or westwards), the number of time zones crossed, and the strategies used to alleviate them. Behavioural solutions for dealing with jet lag involve attention to lifestyle and activity. These methods are preferable to pharmacological means of treating the syndrome. There remains the issue of athlete compliance with any travel strategies, and a systematic educational programme can assist in securing acceptance of any recommendations.
Key words: Behaviour, pharmacology, promoting readjustment, time-zone transitions.

Introduction
Circadian rhythmicity in human physiology has been extensively reported. The internal timing mechanism that mediates this rhythm (the body clock) is located within the anterior of the hypothalamus in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The purpose of circadian rhythms is to prepare the body for waking in the light and for sleeping when it is naturally dark. Temporal isolation studies, wherein subjects are kept in caves or isolation chambers and in conditions of a constant environment, have shown that one of the inherent characteristics of the body clock is that it free-runs with a period of ~24.5 hours, so it tends to become phase delayed. This inexact timing mechanism is set to an exact 24-hour day by so-called zeitgebers (time givers); these include the light-dark cycle, the sleep-wake cycle, rhythms in socialisation, feeding and, possibly, based on some recent evidence, rhythms of activity and exercise.
Jet lag is caused by the sluggish readjustment of the circadian timing mechanism to the new environment. Table 1 illustrates this adjustment for a flight from the UK to Beijing, China (8 time zones eastwards). Other explanations for jet lag include 1) the hassle of the flight, 2) the new lifestyle, food and culture at the destination, 3) the excitement of attending important events, and 4) the length of the flight. However, jet lag can be induced in an isolation chamber (where no travel has been undertaken), is found after returning home back to a normal routine, and its severity is related to the number of time zones crossed, not the flight length. The symptoms of jet lag include the following: fatigue; sleep disturbance (either the inability to get to sleep or an earlier waking time); inappropriately timed hunger or loss of appetite; losses of concentration and drive; and headaches. The net result is a likely decrease in training effect and performance.
How long does it take to get over jet lag? Unlike travel fatigue, which an individual normally takes less than 24 hours to recover from, recovery from jet lag depends on the direction of travel and the number of time zones crossed. Generally, symptoms are more severe and readjustment takes longer the greater the number of time zones involved. Eastward travel is less well tolerated than westward, due to the inherent property of the body clock to run slightly slow. Further, after an eastward journey across 10 time zones, current guidelines suggest that, for the purposes of the use of light as a readjustment strategy, it should be treated as a transition of 14 hours to the west. This tendency for the body clock to adjust by a delay rather than an advance after crossing 10-12 time zones in an easterly direction (where destination time is advanced by 10-12 hours with regard to departure time) is termed an antidromic effect.
There is some evidence that older individuals, who are generally less fit, take longer to readjust than younger, fitter individuals (9). This superiority is not necessarily the case in well-motivated and experienced travellers (10).
The problems of jet lag can be reduced and managed by suitable planning before the flight, actions during it, and after arrival at the destination. Many Olympic squads are given formal advice, normally in the form of a booklet as a complement to personal counselling. In the case of the Great Britain Olympic team (Team GB), this advice was the culmination of two years research, in which a “dry run” was conducted the year before the 2000 Games, and each athlete who participated received a feedback report on his/her adjustment. This targeting and specific educational programme prior to the Games led to a good compliance of staff and athletes at the preparation camp in the Gold Coast (Australia), and identified those individuals who had severe symptoms and a slower than average rate of adjustment.

Before the flight
For complete adaptation, current advice suggests that athletes should schedule their arrival well in advance of competition, allowing one day for each time zone travelled to the west and 1.5 days for each time-zone travelled in an easterly direction (4). This allowance may be an overestimation and would be impractical, as it would require an athlete travelling from the UK to arrive 15 days prior to the 2000 Games. The athletes spend longer than this period at the “preparation camp”. It has prompted a more realistic suggestion of leaving one day for each time zone crossed in either westward or eastward journeys (9).

Travel times
Some of the factors that can be changed relatively easily are the time of flight departure, and hence time of arrival, and the decision whether or not to incorporate a stopover to break up the journey. Arriving as close to night-time in the new time zone as schedules allow promotes adjustment indirectly due to the accumulation of fatigue during the flight; this tactic aids sleep during the first night-time at the destination, and the sleep-wake cycle acts as a zeitgeber. If the journey (such as one from the UK to the East coast of Australia) is broken up, with a stopover in Singapore for a few days, this break aids adjustment at the final destination, as it gives the body clock a chance to adjust partially when exposed to the environment at the place of stopover. In practice, this break in the journey involves extra hassle for the athlete in terms of maintaining quality of training. Also, it could add complications such as heat and humidity in the stopover environment, and these present their own problems for the athlete.

Pre-adjustment strategy
Generally, adjustment of sleep-wake habits prior to the flight could in theory begin to alter the normal circadian rhythm in the desired direction prior to departure. This strategy involves sending the athlete to bed earlier and getting him/her up earlier for an eastward journey, and to retire and rise later for a westward journey. The strategy for a westward flight is tolerated more easily than that for a flight to the east as, when sent to bed earlier (eastward flight), athletes find it hard to get to sleep until the normal time (biological time) - and then are expected to wake earlier than usual. As a result, some sleep deprivation occurs. In order to avoid disrupting the circadian rhythm unduly and allow the athlete to continue to train normally, an adjustment of the sleep-wake cycle by no more than 1-2 hours and for no more than 1-2 days is recommended.

During the flight
Generally, when onboard the idea is to change as much as possible the behaviour of the athlete to that appropriate to destination time in terms of activity, sleep and wakefulness, and eating meals. These strategies should be conveyed to the cabin crew, to avoid confusion and inappropriate times of waking the athlete, for example for meals. Further, there is a need to replenish the fluid loss due to the dry environment on the plane. Diuretics such as those containing caffeine or alcohol should be avoided during the flight, as they are diuretics and would accentuate dehydration. Due to the increase in incidence of deep vein thrombosis associated with inactivity in a cramped environment, performing isometric exercises, and leaving the seat periodically to walk around the plane, are advised.

After arrival
There has recently been some interest in the use of massage and deep breathing. Neither of these strategies has been shown to aid adjustment at the destination, though the value of massage to stimulate blood flow after travel is not to be discouraged. The two general approaches to readjustment are pharmacological and behavioural. The use of chronobiotics such as melatonin, which directly shifts the body clock or indirectly aids adjustment due to the hypnotic properties that aid getting to sleep at the new night-time, has received some attention in research on jet lag. There has been some concern with appropriate timing of melatonin to aid in readjustment after an easterly transition across 10 time zones. Further, when strict control of light-avoidance and exposure is not adhered to, the effectiveness of melatonin is reduced (1). The current position statement of the British Olympic Association advises athletes against using melatonin. Furthermore, in the UK, pure melatonin is available only when prescribed by a physician (8).
The behavioural strategy involves the appropriate use of the zeitgebers (time-givers) that aid entrainment – the light-dark and the sleep-wakefulness cycles, diet and meal-times, and activity and exercise. There is little scientific evidence to support the value of diet in promoting clock adjustment, the suggestion being to consume protein in the morning and carbohydrate at night-time, in order to promote arousal and sleep, respectively. In implementing adjustment strategies aimed at shifting the human circadian rhythm, an indirect marker for the body clock is used. This reference point is the body temperature minimum. Rectal temperature shows its peak value at ~18:00 hours and a minimum at 06:00 hours, and this 24-hour profile can be described well by a cosine curve (see Figure 1). Light is the strongest zeitgeber, and the effect of light depends upon the time of exposure, as described by a phase-response curve (2, 3, 5). Exposure to light during the 6 hours before the temperature minimum results in a delay, and in the 6 hours after the temperature minimum a phase advance. Exposure to bright light at other times results in no phase shift, and this is referred to as a “dead-zone”. If a phase-delaying strategy is used, in the case of a 10 time-zone transition to the east (UK to the east coast of Australia), this would mean exposure to light between 10:00-16:00 hours (local time) on day 1 and avoiding light between 16:00-22:00 hours. On day 2, as the body temperature minimum would have delayed by about one hour to 17:00 h by local time), the next day’s light exposure would be between 11:00-17:00 hours and avoidance between 17:00-23:00 hours, and so on for subsequent days. If a phase-advance strategy were used for the same journey, then light would be avoided before 16:00 hours for the 2-3 days in the new time-zone. It is generally found that readjustment tends to follow an exponential function, with greater adjustment occurring in the first few days (12).

Figure 2 shows the working example of a possible advantage of adjustment by a phase delay (14 hours) rather than advance after a time-zone transition of 10 hours. Peak performance generally occurs in the evening and the temperature minimum, associated with greater sleepiness and lowest performance, is found towards the end of sleep. The cosine curve has been transposed onto the local time in the new time-zone, with complete adjustment shown. Immediately after arrival, peak temperature and performance will be at about 04:00 hours and the minimum temperature value and worst performance at 16:00 hours. If a phase delay occurs, peak performance is delayed through the day such that it occurs later each day and sleepiness prevails through the evening. This adaptation means that there is some time of the day when high-quality training can take place during the process of adjustment. By contrast, an advance of the body clock by 10 hours moves the peaks of temperature and performance through the night-time in the new time–zone, and the temperature minimum and maximum sleepiness occur in the morning and afternoon. This timing indicates a theoretical advantage with adjustment by a delay rather than an advance after an eastward journey across 10 time zones. It also is more convenient with regard to light exposure for individuals arriving in the early morning in the new time-zone. There are, however, difficulties in translating theory to practice. In the field study before the Sydney Olympics, referred to above, adjustment was consistent with a delay for 35/85 individuals, with that of an advance of the body clock for 23/85 and for 27/85 it was unclear as to whether adjustment was by an advance or delay (7, 11). Such a separation of adjustment would have made it difficult to manage daily preparations in Australia after arrival. Therefore, with the additional consideration of departure and arrival times and keeping the teams as a whole entity, a ‘phase-advance’ strategy was chosen for all, involving light-avoidance in the morning, no morning training for 3-4 days, and a lie-in in bed for the first three days. This strategy worked well prior to the 2000 Summer Olympics.

Issues relating to athletes and jet lag coping strategies
Those athletes who were the more compliant tended to adjust faster than those who were resistant; the “poor adjusters” tended to be led by coaches and managers who were resistant to the advice, but rather stuck to “what they always did”, irrespective of the multiple time-zone transition. Training at a lower intensity and duration than normal for the first couple of days after arrival was advocated, to help reduce possible problems with injury. Exercise can take place outdoors at times advocated for light exposure, and tactics might be discussed indoors when light should be avoided. One of the problems at the destination is “anchor sleep” which refers to a short sleep period at the time the individual would normally have been asleep if living on home time. Such sleep contrives to “anchor” circadian rhythms to home time and this opposes adaptation to the new local time. For this reason, napping is not advocated for the first few days after arrival at the destination. On restarting normal training practices, the coach should monitor the athletes whilst they are not fully adjusted, and everybody’s expectations of performance should reflect this lack of full adjustment. When educating the athlete as to what jet lag is and what strategies should be adopted to minimise it, the encouragement of perseverance, compliance and a positive attitude helps to promote adjustment to the new time zone.

Conclusions: Looking forward to the Beijing 2008 summer Games
Essential planning and preparation include a comprehensive programme that starts prior to travel and includes coping strategies that apply both onboard and after arrival. The first question regarding UK and European athletes travelling to Beijing is ‘should they attempt to advance the body clock by 8 hours or delay it by 16 hours?’ Unlike the Sydney Games, where a delay of 14 hours was at least feasible, an 8-hour advance (for the Beijing Games) would be easier to achieve than a 16-h delay; behaviour to promote such an advance should be advocated. The behavioural approach of light exposure and avoidance, coupled with outdoor exercise and indoor discussions when appropriate, will be paramount in achieving this aim. The strategy can be implemented by raising awareness of the issues involved, and by providing clear guidelines on the actions required and the behaviour patterns to be avoided. The use of drugs such as hypnotics or melatonin is not advocated – although those athletes that already do use these means will not be advised against continuing to do so, but they should be monitored by their sports physician. Further, it is good practice to send key athletic support staff to the destination before the athletes’ arrival, to ensure they are prepared for the athletes and not getting over jet lag themselves when they have to be fully alert for work.
Key points:
  1. Jet lag is the result of rapid transition across multiple time-zones.
  2. Preparation prior to, during, and after arrival at destination can help reduce the symptoms of jet lag.
  3. Behavioural strategies such as light avoidance and exposure should be preferentially adopted rather than pharmacology.
  4. An educational programme providing feedback to athletes by oral presentations and in written form works well and provides informed advice as what to expect.
  5. Once the decision of the appropriate strategy has been made, all athletes in the team should be informed with the expectation that all follow the resultant programme.
  6. Some individuals take longer to adjust and report heightened symptoms and should be monitored until complete adjustment has occurred.

References
  1. Edwards BJ, Atkinson G, Reilly T, Waterhouse J, Godfrey R, Budgett R. 2000. Use of melatonin on recovery from jet-lag following an easterly flight across 10 time-zones. Ergonomics 43:1501-1513.
  2. Czeisler C, Kronauer R, Allan J, Duffy J, Jewett M, Brown E, Ronda J. 1989. Bright light induction of strong (type 0) resetting of the human circadian pacemaker. Science 244:1328-1333.
  3. Honma K, Honma S. 1988. A human phase response curve for bright light pulses. Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol 42:167-168.
  4. Klein KE, Wegmann HM. 1974. The resynchronisation of human circadian
    rhythms after transmeridian flights as a result of flight direction and mode of activity. In: Scheving LE, Halberg F, Pauly JE, editors. Chronobiology. Tokyo: Igku Shoin. p. 564-570.
  5. Minors D, Waterhouse JM, Wirz-Justice A. 1991. A human phase-response curve to light. Neurosci Lett 133:36-40.
  6. Reilly T, Atkinson G, Waterhouse J. 1997. Biological Rhythms and Exercise. Oxford: Oxford University press.
  7. Reilly T, Edwards BJ, Waterhouse J. 2003. Lang-haul travel and jet-lag:
    Behavioural and pharmacological approaches. Medicina Sportiva 7:E115-E122.
  8. Reilly T, Maughan R, Budgett R. 1998. Melatonin: A position statement of the British Olympic Association. Br J Sports Med 32:99-100.
  9. Waterhouse J, Reilly T, Atkinson G. 1997. Jet lag. Lancet 350: 1611-1616.
  10. . Waterhouse J, Edwards B, Nevill A, Atkinson G, Reilly T, Davies P, Godfrey R. 2000. Do subjective symptoms predict our perception of jet-lag? Ergonomics 43: 1514-1527.
  11. Waterhouse J, Edwards B, Nevill A, Atkinson G, Buckley P, Reilly T, Godfrey R, Ramsey R. 2002. Identifying some determinants of “jet lag” and its symptoms: a study of athletes and other travelers. Br J Sports Med 36:54-60.
  12. Wegmann H, Klein K. Conrad B, Esser P. 1983. A model for prediction of resynchronization after time-zone flights. Aviat Space Environ Med 54:524- 527.


List of tables and figures
Table 1. Mismatch between local time and body clock time (hour) after a flight from the UK to Beijing (8 time-zones to the east).
Figure 1. The cosine curve for rectal temperature over a 24-hour period, with an example of the strategy for light exposure and avoidance after a easterly transition of 10 time-zones.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of advancing 10 hours or adjustment by a 14-hour delay of the circadian rhythm of rectal temperature after an easterly flight across 10 time-zones. Shading indicates nighttime.
Table 1. Mismatch between local time and body clock time (hour) after a flight from the UK to Beijing (8 time-zones to the east).




Olympic Sport and the Ecological Ideal of a
Sustainable Development
Sigmund Loland
The Norwegian University for Sport and Physical Education
Norway

Abstract
The question discussed here is whether Olympic sport can be said to meet the ecological ideal of a sustainable development. The question can be understood in several ways. Some analyses focus on ecological costs in terms of the use of non-renewable natural resources, and pollution. A less common perspective deals with the nature of Olympic competition itself and its requirements on human resources. This latter perspective will be pursued here. The approach is analytic and casuistic. Firstly, the ideal of a sustainable development is defined and operationalized. Secondly, representative cases from Olympic sport are examined as to whether the requirements on human resources support this ideal or not. The ideal of a sustainable development is defined as a development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. A narrow interpretation of the Olympic sport and its motto citius, altius, fortius points towards continuous, quantitative growth of performance. This interpretation is seen to contradict the ideal of a sustainable development. A wide interpretation of Olympic sport opens for human complexity and diversity and qualitative measures of performance. Such an interpretation is seen to be ecologically sound. Olympic sport and its ideals are ambiguous. A narrow interpretation expresses an ecologically unsound quest for unlimited growth in limited systems. A wide interpretation opens for an ecologically sound exploration of human complexity and diversity in open systems. In conclusion, some critical comments are given on the possible role and consequences of the wide interpretation in future Olympic sport.
Key terms: Coubertin, performance, records, sustainability.

Introduction
In the so-called fundamental principles of the Olympic Movement, one key reference is the development of human kind through a blend of sport, culture, and education. In the mid-1990s, and due to an increasing awareness of global ecological challenges, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) included the environment as an additional dimension. The IOC’s Sport and Environment Commission emphasizes the responsibility for promoting sustainable development in particular ( For more information see http://olympic.org/UK/organisation/commissions/environment/games-uk.asp).

The operational outcome of this engagement is a set of requirements to be met by Olympic organizers in terms of plans for the environment and for waste and energy management. Although such measures are of value, they do not really matter much if the basic Olympic message is non-ecological in kind. The eco-philosopher Arne Næss (5) pointed towards the significance of what he calls deep ecological thinking in which the basic principles and values guiding and justifying our practices are critically examined. My perspective here will be a deep ecological one. My focus will be on what can be seen as the core of Olympic events, Olympic sports. My question will be whether ecological ideals are compatible with the values of Olympic sports, or whether there value conflicts here which are difficult to overcome.

Ecological ideals
Ecological ideals can be of many kinds. A basic distinction can be drawn between anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric perspectives. From the non-anthropocentric perspective, all life forms, or even landscapes, can be given moral status independent of their value to human beings. Non-anthropological theories challenge in fundamental ways conventional ideas about our relationship to nature, and they have radical implications for sport (2). It will lead too far to pursue this line of reasoning here. Anthropocentric theories on the other hand, in which the value of nature depends upon its role in the contribution to human well-being, are more conventional, and these are the perspectives to which IOC subscribes.
A core anthropocentric ideal, endorsed by the UN World Commission on Environment and Development (7) and by the IOC, is the ideal of a sustainable development. A sustainable development is defined as a development that meets the requirements of the present without compromising the possibilities of future generations to meet their own needs. Further elaboration points towards the dangers of specialized mono-cultures and to the significance of biological and cultural diversity and complexity. The ideal has been discussed in fields such biology, economy, technology, politics and culture. The question here is whether Olympic sports can be said to conform to the ideal.

Sustainable Development and Olympic Sports
According to the Olympic Charter, Coubertin’s ideology of Olympism is still the defining ideology of the Movement (http://www.olympic.org.uk/utilities/reports/level2_uk.asp?HEAD2=26&HEAD1=10). Coubertin’s extensive writings are not always clear and sometimes even contradictory. However, inspired by colleagues and friends, Coubertin succeeded in formulated a striking ‘slogan’ that has become the official Olympic motto: citius, altius, fortius (faster, higher and stronger). According to Coubertin, the setting of records has the same function in Olympic ideology as the law of gravity in Newtonian mechanics – it is ‘the eternal axiom’. The motto emphasizes the highly competitive performance orientation of elite sports, and it reflects the cult of objective, quantitative progress that characterizes the Western culture of modernity in which the Olympic Movement has found its form (1,6). From an ecological perspective, the continuous quest for improved performances and records has some deeply problematic implications.
Elsewhere I have discussed in more detail problems linked to high degree of specialization in sport performances (4). Here comes a brief sketch of the argument. A specialized performance is a performance based primarily on one or two basic bio-motor abilities (such as speed, strength, and endurance), and in which sport-specific technical and tactical skills play minor roles. Most record sports provide paradigmatic cases in this respect. What is at stake here is objective and standardized performance measurements in which the crucial parameters are those of speed, strength, or endurance. Take as an example a typical record sport, the 100-metre sprint race. Biologically, human capabilities for speed are limited. Although new records can be set again and again, every new record represents a further step in the utilization of this limited capability. The continuous quest for improved performance stimulates the development of more or less extreme performance-enhancing means and methods. Some of these, such as doping, have significant moral costs. As soon as a new record is set, the challenge for other runners, or for the next generation of runners, becomes greater. “Record sports” build on the impossible quest for unlimited growth in highly specialized limited systems. In this sense, they seem to represent non-sustainable systems and appear as biological and moral risk zones.
Other sports are defined by less specialized and more complex and diverse performance requirements. In ball games, for example, performances are built on technical and tactical skills, they are measured in non-exact entities such as points and goals, and they are always relative to an opposition (Figure 1). Although discussions of who is the best player or what is the best game ever are interesting and entertaining, there are no precise and agreed criteria upon which they can be settled. Games offer no possibility for record setting in the strict sense of the term. Every new contest is a new opportunity, and one great performance does not represent a utilization of resources that are not available to other players or new generations of players. Obviously, sports with more complex performance ideals constitute sustainable systems to a larger extent, and they are less vulnerable to excessive and morally problematic performance-enhancing means and methods. From the ecological perspective, they are sounder.

Concluding Comments
I have sketched an answer to the question of whether Olympic sports can be said to conform to the ideal of a sustainable development. The answer is both in the positive and the negative. I have argued that the Olympic ideal of highly specialized record sports performances is a non-sustainable one, and that games offer a more sustainable sport paradigm. The argument calls for some concluding comments
If the points above are valid, one should expect that specialized record sports will degenerate and vanish. Indeed, the degeneration scenario is possible. However, it is not the only one. Without being able to go into details at this point, I have pointed out elsewhere how record sports can be restructured into more complex, diverse and sustainable performance systems (3) and I believe that these are constructive alternatives worth considering here.
Another possibility is that the problem of non-sustainability is met by emerging, alternative sport paradigms such as those found in the increasingly popular board sports (such as surfing, skate boarding, snow boarding, and kite boarding). These activities build on non-quantifiable, creative performances with emphasis on individual expression and artistic values. As with games, they are less vulnerable to bio-medical performance-enhancing excesses than traditional record sports, and they might constitute a more sustainable Olympic sport paradigm in the time to come.

References
  1. Korsgaard, O. (1990) ‘Sport as a practice of religion: The record as ritual’. In: Carter, J. M. and Krüger, A.(eds) : Ritual and Record. Sport Records and Quantification of Pre-modern Societies. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 115-122.
  2. Loland, S. (1995) ‘Outline of an ecosophy of sport’, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport XXIII: 70-90.
  3. Loland, S. (2001) ‘Record sports: An ecological critique and a reconstruction’. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport XXVIII: 127-139.
  4. Loland, S. (2004) ‘The vulnerability thesis and its consequences: A critique of specialization in Olympic sports’, in: Bale, J. and Krogh-Christensen, M. (eds): Post-Olympism. Questioning Sport in the Twenty-first Century. London: Berg, pp. 189-199.
  5. Nisbet, R. (1994) History of The Idea of Progress. London: Transaction.
  6. Næss, A. (1989) Ecology, Community and Life Style. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
  7. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP


Figure 1. The game of hurling engages technical and tactical skills, scoring is by goals (equal to 3 points) and points.
Characteristics:
  • all round and relative progress
  • non-specialization
  • technical and tactical complexity (games)
  • few limits to progress
  • sustainable




Contact:
Thomas Reilly
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences
Liverpool John Moores University
Henry Cotton Campus
15-21 Webster Street
Liverpool, L3 2ET
United Kingdom
T.P.Reilly@ljmu.ac.uk


The IAAF SCHOOL / YOUTH Programme
Abdelmalek El-Hebil

 
© Abdelmalek El-Hebil
Senior Manager / IAAF

Introduction
The IAAF has started this year to implement its ambitious youth athletics program intended for both school and clubs. The main objective of the IAAF is to make Athletics the number one sport in Schools. A new commission has been created for this purpose and a new structure has been established in the IAAF to assist this commission in the achievement of its objectives. These objectives should be achieved by 2012 and the project should be implemented through different stages.

Plan of Action 2003 - 2012
“Make Athletics the world-wide number one participatory sport in schools in 2012”
(MFs = Member Federations)
Diagram 1

1. Concept of the Educational Project:
The first stage is a stage of reflection. The main objective of this reflection concerns the concept of the IAAF Educational Project.
  • Youth Athletics regards the transitory period which spreads from the basic stage of discovery to the advanced grown-up’s training.
  • We are dealing with a Global Educational Project intended to kids and youth which needs the support of educational documents (Kids’ Athletics – System of competitions for the 13-15 years old)
This is a stage of decision as well, whether to implement a strategy and resources indispensable to the development of this plan.
The implementation of this Project mainly requires:
  • To arrange adequate coaching in the process: National Instructors’ Educational Project (two Pilot Courses for Instructors in 2006: the first one was organised in Mauritius for 21 countries and the second one was organised in Beijing for 10 countries)
  • To finalize the required documents (Kids’ Athletics Educational Programme for 7-12 year-old children; Scoring Tables for competitions for the 7-15 years old)
  • To break the isolation of school sports (World Athletics Day with Schools’ participation; Circular addressed to MFs and Area Associations)
  • To increase the number of exhibitions of Kids’ Athletics (KA)
1.2 Implementation of the Project
This stage corresponds to the realization of the project: it has to ensure the arrangement of a developing network within each Member Federation in order to make sure that the Educational Project actually infiltrates the various educational systems (Schools and Federations) of the concerned countries.
This stage requires a strict planning of the actions:
  • Education of Instructors
  • KA Programme and Competitions for the 13-15 years old
  • Reinforcement of World Athletics Day in Schools, a specific webpage, increase KA exhibitions
  • Strengthening the follow-up of the Youth Athletics by the Member Fe